Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“Help End Establishment Politics, Vote No on Hillary,”
At the front of the parade was a flag with the Democratic donkey flying upside down. Further animating the protest was the release by WikiLeaks ofhacked emails from the Democratic National Committee showing party efforts to undermine Mr. Sanders’s candidacy, reinforcing a widespread view among marchers that party leaders had stacked the deck against him.
“It’s not just young people who are furious. There are people who have been Democrats for decades and are completely angry,” said Kimberly Cooper, 59, of Florida. “Now with the WikiLeaks thing, I am finished supporting her.”
how so? what did she do?google "conspiracy".
The Chairman had her "finger on the scale" for hiLIARy
how so? what did she do?google "conspiracy".
The Chairman had her "finger on the scale" for hiLIARy
Dot I'm so glad to have witnessed this primary cycle. I'd practically given up hope that the backs of the parties could be broken. Trump did it and Bernie out of nowhere came bloody close. If it wasn't for Hillary's lead with the super delegates before the race even began, I think Sanders could have pulled it off.
We all have known for many a year that the fix was in for candidates and their coronations but it was this election cycle that PROVED we were right.
I am thrilled to death that Trump's hammering away at the D rigged system. And I hope he keeps it up.
I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
hiLIARy is not a good candidate. Someone had to tell you sooner or later.iamwhatiseem said:I am still shocked....if your a leftist...Bernie represented everything you supposedly believe in...up and down the line. Hillary does not. She is a corporatist insider, highly polished wind shifter that doesn't even come close to representing the left - especially progressives - and yet - they voted for her.
Mind boggling.
No, right wing propaganda. A few "liberals" fell for it, but only a few.
Clinton is the most liberal candidate the Democrats have ever run. Her positions are nearly identical to Sanders. She is more liberal than him in some ways, less liberal in others.
Clinton's political history is not pro-corporate. Her current platform is very anti-corporate. Those calling Clinton a "corporatist" are making up stories, doing the GOP's dirty work for them.
Bernie Sanders wasn't stupid enough to fall for that kind of right-wing propaganda. If a Bernie voter is falling for it, they've betrayed the spirit of Bernie. And if they're voting third party and letting Trump win because "but my feelings are hurt!", then they're part of the problem, an opponent of what liberals have worked for, and what many have died for.
You won't find any minorities pulling such moral purity crap, as they understand more clearly what's at stake. Real people will suffer and die if Trump is elected. And the morally pure crowd doesn't care, because they don't think they'll be affected themselves. Mighty big of them. A million dead Iraqis would criticize them as well, if they weren't dead, indirectly killed by the moral purity of some Nader voters.
And "fixed"? Get a grip, and lose the sour grapes. Someone wrote an email of a tactic that wasn't used, so the kooks are going into conspiracy meltdown mode. If someone is that devoid of rationality and common sense, I can see why the Democrats might not be the party for them.
I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
Please explain how the content of those emails were used in any way and how the use of those tactics assured a win for Clinton.
You are making a lot of pronouncements without anything backing it up.
I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
Please explain how the content of those emails were used in any way and how the use of those tactics assured a win for Clinton.
You are making a lot of pronouncements without anything backing it up.
Ethically and Morally it is a bad move , the DNC is not suppose to support one side and let Americans decide. This whole year we have seen tampering to rig the system on both sides..this is just proof that it was going on..
.
proof of tampering? no.I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
Please explain how the content of those emails were used in any way and how the use of those tactics assured a win for Clinton.
You are making a lot of pronouncements without anything backing it up.
Ethically and Morally it is a bad move , the DNC is not suppose to support one side and let Americans decide. This whole year we have seen tampering to rig the system on both sides..this is just proof that it was going on..
.
proof of tampering? no.I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
Please explain how the content of those emails were used in any way and how the use of those tactics assured a win for Clinton.
You are making a lot of pronouncements without anything backing it up.
Ethically and Morally it is a bad move , the DNC is not suppose to support one side and let Americans decide. This whole year we have seen tampering to rig the system on both sides..this is just proof that it was going on..
.
proof some people had an opinion, sure
so without proof of anything you say it was proof of tampering?proof of tampering? no.I think the entire DNC was involved in those emails. Two parties are corrupt to the coreWasserman already spoke yesterday introducing Clinton and then Clinton introduced the VP..
She should be fired, or anyone who were involved in those emails. Same thing for the republicans if it happens...
Please explain how the content of those emails were used in any way and how the use of those tactics assured a win for Clinton.
You are making a lot of pronouncements without anything backing it up.
Ethically and Morally it is a bad move , the DNC is not suppose to support one side and let Americans decide. This whole year we have seen tampering to rig the system on both sides..this is just proof that it was going on..
.
proof some people had an opinion, sure
We don't know that yet, there is more to come...
You seem to be the one obsessed w/ the topic judging by your flailing about posting "Yabut!!!" responses.hiLIARy is not a good candidate. Someone had to tell you sooner or later.iamwhatiseem said:I am still shocked....if your a leftist...Bernie represented everything you supposedly believe in...up and down the line. Hillary does not. She is a corporatist insider, highly polished wind shifter that doesn't even come close to representing the left - especially progressives - and yet - they voted for her.
Mind boggling.
No, right wing propaganda. A few "liberals" fell for it, but only a few.
Clinton is the most liberal candidate the Democrats have ever run. Her positions are nearly identical to Sanders. She is more liberal than him in some ways, less liberal in others.
Clinton's political history is not pro-corporate. Her current platform is very anti-corporate. Those calling Clinton a "corporatist" are making up stories, doing the GOP's dirty work for them.
Bernie Sanders wasn't stupid enough to fall for that kind of right-wing propaganda. If a Bernie voter is falling for it, they've betrayed the spirit of Bernie. And if they're voting third party and letting Trump win because "but my feelings are hurt!", then they're part of the problem, an opponent of what liberals have worked for, and what many have died for.
You won't find any minorities pulling such moral purity crap, as they understand more clearly what's at stake. Real people will suffer and die if Trump is elected. And the morally pure crowd doesn't care, because they don't think they'll be affected themselves. Mighty big of them. A million dead Iraqis would criticize them as well, if they weren't dead, indirectly killed by the moral purity of some Nader voters.
And "fixed"? Get a grip, and lose the sour grapes. Someone wrote an email of a tactic that wasn't used, so the kooks are going into conspiracy meltdown mode. If someone is that devoid of rationality and common sense, I can see why the Democrats might not be the party for them.
She is the nominee. Get over it.
by doing what? how did they have their finger on the scale?they had their finger on the scale in the home office.
i am unaware of any actions that were actually taken that would have hurt sanders.you playing dumb or are you actually this thick?by doing what? how did they have their finger on the scale?they had their finger on the scale in the home office.
You seem to be the one obsessed w/ the topic judging by your flailing about posting "Yabut!!!" responses.hiLIARy is not a good candidate. Someone had to tell you sooner or later.iamwhatiseem said:I am still shocked....if your a leftist...Bernie represented everything you supposedly believe in...up and down the line. Hillary does not. She is a corporatist insider, highly polished wind shifter that doesn't even come close to representing the left - especially progressives - and yet - they voted for her.
Mind boggling.
No, right wing propaganda. A few "liberals" fell for it, but only a few.
Clinton is the most liberal candidate the Democrats have ever run. Her positions are nearly identical to Sanders. She is more liberal than him in some ways, less liberal in others.
Clinton's political history is not pro-corporate. Her current platform is very anti-corporate. Those calling Clinton a "corporatist" are making up stories, doing the GOP's dirty work for them.
Bernie Sanders wasn't stupid enough to fall for that kind of right-wing propaganda. If a Bernie voter is falling for it, they've betrayed the spirit of Bernie. And if they're voting third party and letting Trump win because "but my feelings are hurt!", then they're part of the problem, an opponent of what liberals have worked for, and what many have died for.
You won't find any minorities pulling such moral purity crap, as they understand more clearly what's at stake. Real people will suffer and die if Trump is elected. And the morally pure crowd doesn't care, because they don't think they'll be affected themselves. Mighty big of them. A million dead Iraqis would criticize them as well, if they weren't dead, indirectly killed by the moral purity of some Nader voters.
And "fixed"? Get a grip, and lose the sour grapes. Someone wrote an email of a tactic that wasn't used, so the kooks are going into conspiracy meltdown mode. If someone is that devoid of rationality and common sense, I can see why the Democrats might not be the party for them.
She is the nominee. Get over it.
Doesn't matter if she won by 2 votes or 20 million votes, they had their finger on the scale in the home office.
you playing dumb or are you actually this thick?by doing what? how did they have their finger on the scale?they had their finger on the scale in the home office.
here's what it comes down to - the emails expressing support for clinton or opposition to sanders didn't actually do anything. they were wrong, but they didn't matter.you playing dumb or are you actually this thick?by doing what? how did they have their finger on the scale?they had their finger on the scale in the home office.
Don't have a good answer do you?
