Iceland’s Volcanic Pollution Dwarfs All Of Europe’s Human Emissions

[elektra]

old rock

Liberal sidestep.

Even your status would not survive as such without hydrocarbons.

You are truly a study in stupid.

Bullshit, Old Crock is not a study in stupid, Old Crock is Stupidity. I can link to Old Crock's posts to prove it!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Every Scientific Society in the world, every National Academy of Science, and every major University, has policy statements that say that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. At least 96% of scientists accept the evidence for climate change created by global warming. It is fools like you that have unfounded belief that all these scientists are wrong. Unfounded because you cannot present the least bit of scientific evidence for your position.

Your failed models and GCM's which have failed to predict ANYTHING say differently. The earth and normal variation kick the alarmist asses every time... By the way, those policy statements are done by bureaucrats not scientists..

 

[Old Rocks]

Every Scientific Society in the world, every National Academy of Science, and every major University, has policy statements that say that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. At least 96% of scientists accept the evidence for climate change created by global warming. It is fools like you that have unfounded belief that all these scientists are wrong. Unfounded because you cannot present the least bit of scientific evidence for your position.

Your failed models and GCM's which have failed to predict ANYTHING say differently. The earth and normal variation kick the alarmist asses every time... By the way, those policy statements are done by bureaucrats not scientists..

Well now, little dumb fuck, why don't you provide us with a link demonstrating that to be the case? Because you cannot. The statements are done by real scientists, not the obese junkies on the radio your type of idiot prefers.

 

[skookerasbil]

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/Man-sleeping.jpg.html][/URL]

The science on volcanic activity as it relates to the climate has long been a source of humongous thorns in the sides of the AGW crowd. They come off the rails when it is brought up........devastates the established narrative. Been watching this for over 20 years......always highly amusing.

 

[skookerasbil]

High levels of fraud continue to plague the climate change movement as it relates to man-made causes >>>

http://www.omsj.org/issues/global-warming/ccfraud

Meanwhile, the computer models on man-made effects on the climate or volcanic effects on the climate continue to be inaccurate >>>

How Volcanoes Affect Climate -- and Rainfall Discovery News

Bottom line? We still don't know shit about shit about this stuff.......we wont know for decades at best. In the meantime, predictions on the effects are nothing more than conjecture.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Every Scientific Society in the world, every National Academy of Science, and every major University, has policy statements that say that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. At least 96% of scientists accept the evidence for climate change created by global warming. It is fools like you that have unfounded belief that all these scientists are wrong. Unfounded because you cannot present the least bit of scientific evidence for your position.

Your failed models and GCM's which have failed to predict ANYTHING say differently. The earth and normal variation kick the alarmist asses every time... By the way, those policy statements are done by bureaucrats not scientists..

Well now, little dumb fuck, why don't you provide us with a link demonstrating that to be the case? Because you cannot. The statements are done by real scientists, not the obese junkies on the radio your type of idiot prefers.

Let me get this straight... A "Dumb Fuck" using failed models is calling me names because i pointed out his models are all broken?

Every one of the IPCC PROJECTIONS FAIL...

And then we have the 126 models in the US that the EPA uses to do their mountains of bull shit. And it comes as no surprise, that after running those models 102 times and averaging the output, they have no basis in reality.

Now who is really the "Dumb Fuck"?

 

[mamooth]

You are, for using those fudged graphs.

As usual, no source from you. It's that plagiarism thing you're so well known for. It's sad that I have to tell everyone what your sources are.

Top graph ... Dr. Dale Evans, the Electrical Engineer and famous Australian denier who claims to be a rocket scientist, but has never actually worked on a rocket. And the husband of JoNova, Australian #1 kook denier blogger.

Dr David Evans The Skeptic 8217 s Case JoNova

Bottom graph, it's Cristy's fudge from an article he wrote for the WSJ.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303945704579391611041331266

Now, a skeptical person would have asked things like ...

Exactly where did Evans get the data?

Why did he creatively adjust the data by using a baseline that was way the hell off? An error of that magnitude indicates either deliberate dishonesty, or total ineptness with statistics.

Why, in the top graph, did he compare surface temps to satellite temps? Apples and oranges.

Why did he use the wrong emission scenario? Actually emission were closer to "C", and with the baseline fix, Hansen's ancient model is pretty damn close to the real world.

Who checked his work? Why wasn't he willing to submit it to peer-review, and instead only published on a denier propaganda website?

Why did Christy also creatively adjust the baseline?

Why didn't Christy compare apples to apples and use a surface temp set?

The fact that you didn't ask any such questions shows how you're clearly not a skeptic. Deniers are the precise opposite of skeptics. If they see something that confirms their faith, they toss critical thought out the window and instantly believe.