paddymurphy
Gold Member
- Jun 9, 2015
- 4,020
- 632
You asked for a link. Have you read is since then? The prevalence of fatherlessness would be reduced by children adopted by two men. If one father is good, two would be great. It is so apparent from your posts that your wife had the good sense to take your kids as far away from you as possible. Right?I'm fully aware of the decision. It made no point about the prevalence of fatherlessness and how homo marriage could only exacerbate that problem. You need to educate yourself, lazy.Typically lazy right winger. Engages in a debate about a topic without ever bothering to educate himself on it. You will need to read more than the ruling; you will need to read the transcripts of the more than dozen trials where there was actual evidence presented. In none of those cases could your side present credible evidence that having gay parents had any detrimental effect on kids. Frankly, the only harm is that they run the risk of being exposed to hateful pricks like you who would take their hatred of gay people out of their children.Give me a link, I'll read it and shoot it down.The children argument has been the one most substantial argument against legal homo marriage. It is exactly why the homonazi agenda avoided it and focused on religion instead. Now it's time for the children argument to be made.
Read the Obergefell ruling. It addresses children head on.
You've already lost this argument too.