flacaltenn
Diamond Member
I've seen better intel in a fortune cookie...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From the article linked by the OP.
On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
Yes there is very detailed and specific information there I'm sure any and all of us could have looked at that and deduced that on September 11th 2001 Al-Qaeda terrorist were going to high jack commrecial airplanes and use them as kamikazes against civilian targets. The partisanship of this thread is surpassed only by it's idiocy.
Obama's incompetence is a tragedy. Of course, I figured that out before he had six months in office.*sigh*
How many libs have rushed into Libya threads chastising Conservatives for "politicizing" the "tragedy"?
Again Clinton told the CIA not to kill Bin Laden twice your so lost lady I will pray for your brain to work again tonight
Look under your pinky finger.
That's called a "shift" key.
Use it.
Under your R ring finger is the period and comma.
Use them.
Or don't.
But, if you don't, your words make no sense. If you DO use those keys ... Oh never mind. You don't make any sense anyway.
I despise what Bush did to this country, to all the hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed, to our economy that will take generations to repair but, IF what we were told was true at that time, he could not have known enough details to make a difference.
OTOH, he really loved being a war president and so did that vile excrement, Cheney.
From the article linked by the OP.
On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
Yes there is very detailed and specific information there I'm sure any and all of us could have looked at that and deduced that on September 11th 2001 Al-Qaeda terrorist were going to high jack commrecial airplanes and use them as kamikazes against civilian targets. The partisanship of this thread is surpassed only by it's idiocy.
Read my post.
I despise what Bush did to this country, to all the hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed, to our economy that will take generations to repair but, IF what we were told was true at that time, he could not have known enough details to make a difference.
OTOH, he really loved being a war president and so did that vile excrement, Cheney.
From the article linked by the OP.
On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
Yes there is very detailed and specific information there I'm sure any and all of us could have looked at that and deduced that on September 11th 2001 Al-Qaeda terrorist were going to high jack commrecial airplanes and use them as kamikazes against civilian targets. The partisanship of this thread is surpassed only by it's idiocy.
Read my post.
I despise what Bush did to this country, to all the hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed, to our economy that will take generations to repair but, IF what we were told was true at that time, he could not have known enough details to make a difference.
OTOH, he really loved being a war president and so did that vile excrement, Cheney.
you're right luddley, Bush caused it all.....he started to agitate palestinians in 1947, he caused all the terrorism....and when we get two of our buildings blown up and thousands dead, we should do nothing.....yeah good call!
What makes you think they need another ten years for that.Read my post.
I despise what Bush did to this country, to all the hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed, to our economy that will take generations to repair but, IF what we were told was true at that time, he could not have known enough details to make a difference.
OTOH, he really loved being a war president and so did that vile excrement, Cheney.
you're right luddley, Bush caused it all.....he started to agitate palestinians in 1947, he caused all the terrorism....and when we get two of our buildings blown up and thousands dead, we should do nothing.....yeah good call!
I heard he stole the Lindbergh baby Give libs another 10 years and they'll have Bush on the grassy knoll.
If Obama was the kind of president we need and wanted him to be, and whom he managed to deceptively convince us he would be, he would have appointed an Attorney General who would have prosecuted Bush for criminal negligence and war crimes.This thread makes me want to vote for Obama.
What makes you think they need another ten years for that.you're right luddley, Bush caused it all.....he started to agitate palestinians in 1947, he caused all the terrorism....and when we get two of our buildings blown up and thousands dead, we should do nothing.....yeah good call!
I heard he stole the Lindbergh baby Give libs another 10 years and they'll have Bush on the grassy knoll.
What makes you think they need another ten years for that.I heard he stole the Lindbergh baby Give libs another 10 years and they'll have Bush on the grassy knoll.
True. The way they are rolling we'll probably see threads on this by tomorrow.
If Obama was the kind of president we need and wanted him to be, and whom he managed to deceptively convince us he would be, he would have appointed an Attorney General who would have prosecuted Bush for criminal negligence and war crimes.This thread makes me want to vote for Obama.
Seems a bit judgemental to me. I mean, Clinton had bin Laden in custody but had him set free. So maybe it's all Clinton's fault because after all, he let the devil out of the box.
If Obama was the kind of president we need and wanted him to be, and whom he managed to deceptively convince us he would be, he would have appointed an Attorney General who would have prosecuted Bush for criminal negligence and war crimes.This thread makes me want to vote for Obama.
*sigh*
How many libs have rushed into Libya threads chastising Conservatives for "politicizing" the "tragedy"? But every day on this board all you get is "Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh".
Bush caused 9/11 and Bush caused Katrina and Bush is a poopy head. Good grief.