If James Madison were alive today ... What he be labeled?

[G.T.]

just "a man."

 

[Avorysuds]

Political philosopher, distruster of large government but willing to use the powers when necessary, would have nothing to do with libertarianism or the far right's reactionary madness.

I find it odd that you hate Republicans while loving the most liberal politician alive next (by actual passed policy) to Obama (Mitt), yet you claim to be anything but liberal.

Mitt is a liberal? Madison did not support the Louisiana Purchase, the 1st national bank and signed the bill for chartering the 2nd national bank?

You help us to see just how much far right reactionary thinking is scrambled.

Back to your patriots coloring book.

Mitt even said his policies are "very progressive." You're stupid and arrogant Jake, that's why every single conservative no matter neocon to libertarian on these boards makes fun of you while almost every single liberal to progressives embraces you.

You got McCain, you got Mitt and you lost both times despite claims that it would grow the party and anyone else would lose the election for Republicans. You have 2 shots and failed, maybe suck it up like a man and take some accountability... like most progressives you just can't do that, you feel obligated to keep pushing for the wrong things no matter how many times you fail.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I find it odd that you hate Republicans while loving the most liberal politician alive next (by actual passed policy) to Obama (Mitt), yet you claim to be anything but liberal.

Mitt is a liberal? Madison did not support the Louisiana Purchase, the 1st national bank and signed the bill for chartering the 2nd national bank?

You help us to see just how much far right reactionary thinking is scrambled.

Back to your patriots coloring book.

Mitt even said his policies are "very progressive." You're stupid and arrogant Jake, that's why every single conservative no matter neocon to libertarian on these boards makes fun of you while almost every single liberal to progressives embraces you.

You got McCain, you got Mitt and you lost both times despite claims that it would grow the party and anyone else would lose the election for Republicans. You have 2 shots and failed, maybe suck it up like a man and take some accountability... like most progressives you just can't do that, you feel obligated to keep pushing for the wrong things no matter how many times you fail.

Not every single one, silly boy, and in fact not most of them. Only the foolishly stupid reactionaries like you act stupidly like that.

We ran the best candidates we had. Any of the reactionary or libertarian candidates would have been slaughtered.

Your time in the party has come and gone. No reactionary or libertarian in 2016.

 

[Sallow]

1) Constitutional Expert

2) right-wing-nut

3) left-wing-nut

Madison was extremely fearful of the corrupting influence of wealth.

He probably would have been out there with the OWS crowd.

 

[deltex1]

After 5 years of Obabble, Madison would have to be viwed as a cockeyed optimist.

 

[Sallow]

He's almost a fucking commie!!!

The great object [of political parties] should be to combat the evil: 1. By establishing a political equality among all. 2. By withholding unnecessary opportunities from a few, to increase the inequality of property, by an immoderate, and especially an unmerited, accumulation of riches. 3. By the silent operation of laws, which, without violating the rights of property, reduce extreme wealth towards a state of mediocrity, and raise extreme indigence towards a state of comfort.

What? Equality? Extreme Wealth REDUCED?

Oh man..

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Not every single one, silly boy, and in fact not most of them. Only the foolishly stupid reactionaries like you act stupidly like that.

We ran the best candidates we had. Any of the reactionary or libertarian candidates would have been slaughtered.

Your time in the party has come and gone. No reactionary or libertarian in 2016.

Doesn't matter if we can or can not win elections, we're the ones with firearms, and the majority of the US Military is not pleased with the way things are proceedings. The Second Amendment allows us to act in self-defense of our property when you moochers attempt to confiscate it. Tyranny of the Majority.

However, it shall never erupt into armed conflict, because America will go the way of Detroit soon enough. Eventually you parasites suck out all the blood of your host, and we both die.

 

[regent]

1) Constitutional Expert

2) right-wing-nut

3) left-wing-nut

So, what was the reason given as to why the gun rights should not be infringed?

 

[g5000]

1) Constitutional Expert

2) right-wing-nut

3) left-wing-nut

Ironic.

Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.

 

[Gardener]

hopefully "he be labeled" nothing because he respects English grammar.

or he would be called a Constitutional know-it-all.

 

[Gardener]

Doesn't matter if we can or can not win elections, we're the ones with firearms, and the majority of the US Military is not pleased with the way things are proceedings. The Second Amendment allows us to act in self-defense of our property when you moochers attempt to confiscate it.

and then you will go to prison for murder.

 

[Plasmaball]

just "a man."

with a plan

 

[Pogo]

just "a man."

with a plan

And a canal?

 

[G.T.]

just "a man."

with a plan

Well, if we're going to get specific I'd guess he probably had some wood or fake hair on his body somewheres too.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Not every single one, silly boy, and in fact not most of them. Only the foolishly stupid reactionaries like you act stupidly like that.

We ran the best candidates we had. Any of the reactionary or libertarian candidates would have been slaughtered.

Your time in the party has come and gone. No reactionary or libertarian in 2016.

Doesn't matter if we can or can not win elections, we're the ones with firearms, and the majority of the US Military is not pleased with the way things are proceedings..

What a stupid ass comment. The overwhelming majority of the armed forces, federal and state, will support the government. You rise up, you get six feet and lime and no gravestone: just forgotten forever.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Doesn't matter if we can or can not win elections, we're the ones with firearms, and the majority of the US Military is not pleased with the way things are proceedings. The Second Amendment allows us to act in self-defense of our property when you moochers attempt to confiscate it.

and then you will go to prison for murder.

An d who is going to imprison us, the disarmed Libtards?

 

[numan]

Doesn't matter if we can or can not win elections, we're the ones with firearms, and the majority of the US Military is not pleased with the way things are proceedings. The Second Amendment allows us to act in self-defense of our property when you moochers attempt to confiscate it.

and then you will go to prison for murder.

Naah · · · the drones will just drop some napalm on his house.

Or, in the not too distant future, an orbiting laser will just vaporize his property.

.

 

[rightwinger]

Madison was one of our worst Presidents

Almost lost the country

 

[numan]

'
Every President was our worst President.

Each and every one took an oath supporting the Constitution -- and each must have known what a vile plan of government it is.

.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

1) Constitutional Expert

2) right-wing-nut

3) left-wing-nut

Political philosopher, distruster of large government but willing to use the powers when necessary, would have nothing to do with libertarianism or the far right's reactionary madness.

Says the whack that Madison would have accurately identified as a Torrie and enabler of King George.

"Madison is a Reactionary!!" -- Jake Starkey