BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,836
- 16,700
- 2,180
The military must step in to save the nation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The military must step in to save the nation
You sound like you are working from a very limited script.
You sound like you are working from a very limited script.
Getting to the point is wise
it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
As I said. We are not the Soviet Union.No. It won’t.It may be imperfect but it is far better than any other system.No more guilty going free and the innocent being locked up because of unwise voters and unwise
Jurors
But this system is changing fast and waiting too long will simply destroy the nation
We have no desire to be like the USSR.
A democracy of the wise is coming
Not a democracy of the unwise
The military and the men agreed with trump
The deep state is in a panic
Who determines who is wise?Andrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To
Big charges and guilty verdicts must now come to the high treason deep state if not the nation is destroyed in soma you ways
So Barr. You must charge high treason and you must take it to a jury that will convict
If not
Trump must step in and declare a broken govt with too many criminals running the govt and then stop the elections until a high logic test is set up for voters and for juries
The unwise voting and on Juries wil
Destroy the nation
Trump has the men and military agreeing with him that the deep state is the enemy of America
If mcade walks the wise will rise up and stop this crooked system
Not happening and if Trump attempts to overthrow our elected government then Pence and our Military will remove him...
But but but its the military that agrees with trump
That is what must be understood
Here is what to understand and the Military leaders will overthrow Trump if Pence order it.
Do not kid yourself to think Trump will become America version of Marcos and declare himself ruler...
States will revolt and Soldiers will not fire on their own...
Trump will
Not be a dictator
He will simply do the will of wise Americans
Putin sure is not getting his money worth with this sock puppet eh?As I said. We are not the Soviet Union.No. It won’t.It may be imperfect but it is far better than any other system.No more guilty going free and the innocent being locked up because of unwise voters and unwise
Jurors
But this system is changing fast and waiting too long will simply destroy the nation
We have no desire to be like the USSR.
A democracy of the wise is coming
Not a democracy of the unwise
The military and the men agreed with trump
The deep state is in a panic
Andrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To
Big charges and guilty verdicts must now come to the high treason deep state if not the nation is destroyed in soma you ways
So Barr. You must charge high treason and you must take it to a jury that will convict
If not
Trump must step in and declare a broken govt with too many criminals running the govt and then stop the elections until a high logic test is set up for voters and for juries
The unwise voting and on Juries wil
Destroy the nation
Trump has the men and military agreeing with him that the deep state is the enemy of America
If mcade walks the wise will rise up and stop this crooked system
If you don’t look you will run over by the trump train that’s gaining steamAndrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To
Big charges and guilty verdicts must now come to the high treason deep state if not the nation is destroyed in soma you ways
So Barr. You must charge high treason and you must take it to a jury that will convict
If not
Trump must step in and declare a broken govt with too many criminals running the govt and then stop the elections until a high logic test is set up for voters and for juries
The unwise voting and on Juries wil
Destroy the nation
Trump has the men and military agreeing with him that the deep state is the enemy of America
If mcade walks the wise will rise up and stop this crooked system
Hey baby huey change your diapers and then link to the active duty military me that agree with trump the orange turd. Who the hell is mcade? Then go back to bed and quit your goddamn crying about deep state.
Who determines who is wise?Andrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To
Big charges and guilty verdicts must now come to the high treason deep state if not the nation is destroyed in soma you ways
So Barr. You must charge high treason and you must take it to a jury that will convict
If not
Trump must step in and declare a broken govt with too many criminals running the govt and then stop the elections until a high logic test is set up for voters and for juries
The unwise voting and on Juries wil
Destroy the nation
Trump has the men and military agreeing with him that the deep state is the enemy of America
If mcade walks the wise will rise up and stop this crooked system
Not happening and if Trump attempts to overthrow our elected government then Pence and our Military will remove him...
But but but its the military that agrees with trump
That is what must be understood
Here is what to understand and the Military leaders will overthrow Trump if Pence order it.
Do not kid yourself to think Trump will become America version of Marcos and declare himself ruler...
States will revolt and Soldiers will not fire on their own...
Trump will
Not be a dictator
He will simply do the will of wise Americans
As I said. We are not the Soviet Union.No. It won’t.It may be imperfect but it is far better than any other system.No more guilty going free and the innocent being locked up because of unwise voters and unwise
Jurors
But this system is changing fast and waiting too long will simply destroy the nation
We have no desire to be like the USSR.
A democracy of the wise is coming
Not a democracy of the unwise
The military and the men agreed with trump
The deep state is in a panic
it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
I would hate to be a citizen in your country, if this is how your government operates.it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
If prosecution decides there is few juries that will convict
Then they are saying system is crooked and broken
And trump must set up another govt that will convict criminals
If not the nation is toast
Who determines who is wise?Not happening and if Trump attempts to overthrow our elected government then Pence and our Military will remove him...
But but but its the military that agrees with trump
That is what must be understood
Here is what to understand and the Military leaders will overthrow Trump if Pence order it.
Do not kid yourself to think Trump will become America version of Marcos and declare himself ruler...
States will revolt and Soldiers will not fire on their own...
Trump will
Not be a dictator
He will simply do the will of wise Americans
Yes indeed who determines who are wise and unwise
The sat math test at the highest level is a good start
The ones that passes determines who has the high logical ability to predict the future correctly
With the top level a lot more women than men will be stopped from voting or making decisions
This is universal law
I would hate to be a citizen in your country, if this is how your government operates.it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
If prosecution decides there is few juries that will convict
Then they are saying system is crooked and broken
And trump must set up another govt that will convict criminals
If not the nation is toast
Why would you and your fellow citizens put up with that kind of crap? You need to rethink, the kind of things you support.... and start a rebellion against them....
Russia just doesn't have the history of democracy that we have...and now they have Putin (paying this guy)I would hate to be a citizen in your country, if this is how your government operates.it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
If prosecution decides there is few juries that will convict
Then they are saying system is crooked and broken
And trump must set up another govt that will convict criminals
If not the nation is toast
Why would you and your fellow citizens put up with that kind of crap? You need to rethink, the kind of things you support.... and start a rebellion against them....
Russia just doesn't have the history of democracy that we have...and now they have Putin (paying this guy)I would hate to be a citizen in your country, if this is how your government operates.it's not some jury.... that won't convict....Bottem Line
If a govt will not prosecute criminals because of some juries will not convict then they themselves are declaring a broken govt
Comey and McCade are counting on many crooked states and cities
New York and Dc totally crooked with brainwashed jurors
The military must step in to save the nation and charge the dc juries and New York State juries with treason charges
it's a grand jury, that is asked. The prosecutors presents all the evidence that he has to a grand jury for an indictment of a person they believe broke the law.
the grand jury examines that evidence and testimony they may hear and decides whether the prosecutor has a solid case that the person broke the law.
99.9% of the time, a grand jury agrees with prosecutors once they have presented their evidence of the criminal act committed to them, and the grand jury issues an indictment.... the person is charged with a crime.
If a grand jury is presented with a case by prosecutors that does not show a person committed a crime, then the grand jury does NOT agree with the prosecution and will not issue an indictment....
it is very very rare, for a grand jury to not indict a person the prosecution recommends, because usually, the prosecution has enough criminal evidence to indict.
If this grand jury was presented with evidence ffrom the prosecution to indict Andrew Mc Cabe, and chose NOT to, then the prosecution did not prove to the grand jury, that Mc Cabe committed any crime
Q. If the Prosecution does not prove there is sufficient evidence to indict, does the Grand Jury have a duty to notify the Defendant?
Q. If there is no indictment, can the AG / DOJ convene a new Grand Jury and bring the Defendant back again?
If prosecution decides there is few juries that will convict
Then they are saying system is crooked and broken
And trump must set up another govt that will convict criminals
If not the nation is toast
Why would you and your fellow citizens put up with that kind of crap? You need to rethink, the kind of things you support.... and start a rebellion against them....