If Kari Doesn't Get Her Stolen Election Back, Americans Won't Have a Country Anymore.

[Indeependent]

Quick kick on first down?

It’s not my problem that you are mentally I’ll and boring.

 

[Skylar]

The courts refused to look at the evidence and you know that quite well.

Nonsense. The courts reviewed load of 'evidence' and found it utterly lacked credibility.

Trump's claim that his people weren't being allowed to observe the vote count? Nonsense, as found by U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond when he confirmed that republican observers were indeed allowed and in the room where the votes were being counted.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them.

Republicans insisted that there were improprieties in the vote count in Michigan....yet could never provide evidence to prove it.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

A republican observer insisted that they were passed a sticky note by 'a poll worker' about late arrivals. Yet they couldn't identify the poll worker, provide any evidence the sticky note was from any poll worker, or provide any evidence

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel claimed that poll workers were told to backdate ballots. Yet she could name nor identify any such poll worker, no pollworkers backed her story, nor did she have any evidence that any ballot had been 'back dated'. Every instance of a 'back dated' ballot had been received on or before the election day.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

Even the 'smoking guns' were a bust. Star witness testimony like Melissa Calrone who claimed to witness elaborate, flagrant and utterly obvious voter fraud (despite numerous republican observers in the room who witnessed no such thing)...her affidavit was reviewed by the courts found to lack credible

"No formal challenges were filed. However, sinister, fraudulent motives were ascribed to the process and the City of Detroit. Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

This was the star witness of fraud, the smoking gun. And she changed her story on camera...adding ludicrous layers of elaboration, invented on the spot and never mentioned in her affidavit.

And of course Trump had the chance to call witnesses, submit all the evidence he had to prove his case....all under oath and under threat of perjury. But also subject to cross examination.

What do you think Trump did? Take a wild guess?

That's right: Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before it was to begin. Tucking his tail between his legs when faced with cross examination, and quietly slinking away.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

All of which the MAGA faithful knows. But ignores in their attempt to cling to their silly 'Big Lie'.....and cast themselves as victims.

MAGA failure worship hasn't born much fruit for your ilk. Plenty of fundraising from rubes, though.

 

[JoeB131]

We elect Presidents by Electoral College votes. There have been other Presidents elected who didn't win the total vote. Bush wasn't the first. Besides that, Gore would have been President if he had won his home state. Grow the fuck up.

BUsh wasn't the first, but the other ones who did were fucking disasters, too.

Rutherford B. Hayes - we can thank that guy for 100 years of Jim Crow.
Benjamin Harrison wrecked the economy.
Bush lied us into a war, wrecked the economy, lost a major city
Trump wrecked the economy, let a plague in that killed a million people, and let the cities burn.

Maybe we need to stop letting this anachronism overrule the will of the people.

 

[BS Filter]

BUsh wasn't the first, but the other ones who did were fucking disasters, too.

Rutherford B. Hayes - we can thank that guy for 100 years of Jim Crow.
Benjamin Harrison wrecked the economy.
Bush lied us into a war, wrecked the economy, lost a major city
Trump wrecked the economy, let a plague in that killed a million people, and let the cities burn.

Maybe we need to stop letting this anachronism overrule the will of the people.

How come you didn't mention John Quincy Adams?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Sort of is correct…
They use “Business Speak”.

Example…
Do you know why HSBC is collapsing?

No...nor do I know why we are moving sideways.

 

[Indeependent]

No...nor do I know why we are moving sideways.

We’re moving in Reality Lane.
If I told why HSBC is going down the shitter you would deny it.

 

[Skylar]

We’re moving in Reality Lane.
If I told why HSBC is going down the shitter you would deny it.

And by 'reality', you mean more conspiracies you can't possibly back up with credible evidence?

We've seen how well your 'election lawsuits' do in court.

Not well.

 

[The5thHorseman]

We’re moving in Reality Lane.
If I told why HSBC is going down the shitter you would deny it.

I would have no reason to take your word for it.

 

[The5thHorseman]

And by 'reality', you mean more conspiracies you can't possibly back up with credible evidence?

We've seen how well your 'election lawsuits' do in court.

Not well.

It's always some Savant's Narrative.

 

[Indeependent]

I would have no reason to take your word for it.

You wouldn’t accept the reason anyway because HSBC went Woke with hiring people based on color and gender.
Bye, bye, HSBC, until Biden bails them out with a few billion dollars of non-Woke taxpayer money.

 

[Redfish]

if the elections are accurate why did every delayed election call go to the democrat?

They didn't.

If you have a case, why must you make up the "facts" supporting it?

which delayed call did not go to the democrat?

 

[Redfish]

Nonsense. The courts reviewed load of 'evidence' and found it utterly lacked credibility.

Trump's claim that his people weren't being allowed to observe the vote count? Nonsense, as found by U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond when he confirmed that republican observers were indeed allowed and in the room where the votes were being counted.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them.

Republicans insisted that there were improprieties in the vote count in Michigan....yet could never provide evidence to prove it.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

A republican observer insisted that they were passed a sticky note by 'a poll worker' about late arrivals. Yet they couldn't identify the poll worker, provide any evidence the sticky note was from any poll worker, or provide any evidence

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel claimed that poll workers were told to backdate ballots. Yet she could name nor identify any such poll worker, no pollworkers backed her story, nor did she have any evidence that any ballot had been 'back dated'. Every instance of a 'back dated' ballot had been received on or before the election day.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

Even the 'smoking guns' were a bust. Star witness testimony like Melissa Calrone who claimed to witness elaborate, flagrant and utterly obvious voter fraud (despite numerous republican observers in the room who witnessed no such thing)...her affidavit was reviewed by the courts found to lack credible

"No formal challenges were filed. However, sinister, fraudulent motives were ascribed to the process and the City of Detroit. Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

This was the star witness of fraud, the smoking gun. And she changed her story on camera...adding ludicrous layers of elaboration, invented on the spot and never mentioned in her affidavit.

And of course Trump had the chance to call witnesses, submit all the evidence he had to prove his case....all under oath and under threat of perjury. But also subject to cross examination.

What do you think Trump did? Take a wild guess?

That's right: Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before it was to begin. Tucking his tail between his legs when faced with cross examination, and quietly slinking away.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

All of which the MAGA faithful knows. But ignores in their attempt to cling to their silly 'Big Lie'.....and cast themselves as victims.

MAGA failure worship hasn't born much fruit for your ilk. Plenty of fundraising from rubes, though.

not one court actually heard the evidence of vote fraud in the 2020 election, lots of excuses to dismiss the cases unheard, but not one case was allowed to present the evidence. We are living in north korea and you libs are too dumb to realize it.

 

[Redfish]

PROVE IT!

its been proven many times already

 

[The5thHorseman]

which delayed call did not go to the democrat?

Lauren Boebert
Ron Johnson


Off the top of my head..

 

[The5thHorseman]

its been proven many times already

You'll have to do better than assertions.

 

[Redfish]

Lauren Boebert
Ron Johnson


Off the top of my head..

Johnson was ahead all along, the delayed call was a confirmation

Boebert is the only exception and that one is still up in the air I think.

 

[Redfish]

You'll have to do better than assertions.

no I don't. the proof of vote fraud is available and valid. the fact that you cannot understand it is your problem, not mine.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Nonsense. The courts reviewed load of 'evidence' and found it utterly lacked credibility.

Trump's claim that his people weren't being allowed to observe the vote count? Nonsense, as found by U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond when he confirmed that republican observers were indeed allowed and in the room where the votes were being counted.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them.

Republicans insisted that there were improprieties in the vote count in Michigan....yet could never provide evidence to prove it.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

A republican observer insisted that they were passed a sticky note by 'a poll worker' about late arrivals. Yet they couldn't identify the poll worker, provide any evidence the sticky note was from any poll worker, or provide any evidence

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel claimed that poll workers were told to backdate ballots. Yet she could name nor identify any such poll worker, no pollworkers backed her story, nor did she have any evidence that any ballot had been 'back dated'. Every instance of a 'back dated' ballot had been received on or before the election day.

Unsurprisingly, the courts voted against them too.

Even the 'smoking guns' were a bust. Star witness testimony like Melissa Calrone who claimed to witness elaborate, flagrant and utterly obvious voter fraud (despite numerous republican observers in the room who witnessed no such thing)...her affidavit was reviewed by the courts found to lack credible

"No formal challenges were filed. However, sinister, fraudulent motives were ascribed to the process and the City of Detroit. Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

This was the star witness of fraud, the smoking gun. And she changed her story on camera...adding ludicrous layers of elaboration, invented on the spot and never mentioned in her affidavit.

And of course Trump had the chance to call witnesses, submit all the evidence he had to prove his case....all under oath and under threat of perjury. But also subject to cross examination.

What do you think Trump did? Take a wild guess?

That's right: Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before it was to begin. Tucking his tail between his legs when faced with cross examination, and quietly slinking away.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

All of which the MAGA faithful knows. But ignores in their attempt to cling to their silly 'Big Lie'.....and cast themselves as victims.

MAGA failure worship hasn't born much fruit for your ilk. Plenty of fundraising from rubes, though.

TMD,WPTAME


(Too much detail, would prefer to avert my eyes)

 

[The5thHorseman]

no I don't. the proof of vote fraud is available and valid. the fact that you cannot understand it is your problem, not mine.

No, that's bullshit.

It's not about "understanding it", it's about being stupid enough to believe it.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Johnson was ahead all along, the delayed call was a confirmation

Boebert is the only exception and that one is still up in the air I think.

How about a "Thank you, Horseman, I stand corrected"?