If Negros Had Been Left To Their Own Devices...

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Yeah and that's exactly what we are talking about is how whites have determined race and identity.

But white centric deniers do is exactly what we see in the quote.

white centrics do the same thing that black centrics do. ----
from the standpoint of BIOLOGY------both are worthless.
A person of any group, or creed or nation or "race" can learn
biology

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

No youre talking about the mixed so called Arabs. These are the same arabs that enslaved whites in europe for sexual pleasure. The first Arabs were Black people.

Haha, so which invasions turned the first Black Arabs into the present Arabs?
There was no such invasion.
You'rre really desperate, and dumb, and hardly Human.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Aren't those Nubians?

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

Nubia conquered Egypt as well. Thats like saying me and my brother got into a fight and one of us won.

When the smart Jewish slaves left with Moses, they had to bring inferiors from the south.

Thats just a story. There is no proof the Black Hebrews were enslaved in Egypt. There is no proof anyone wandered the desert for 40 years either.

But, I thought you said these biblical stories were proof of Blacks in North Africa, and the Near-East?

 

[irosie91]

Yeah and that's exactly what we are talking about is how whites have determined race and identity.

But white centric deniers do is exactly what we see in the quote.

white centrics do the same thing that black centrics do. ----
from the standpoint of BIOLOGY------both are worthless.
A person of any group, or creed or nation or "race" can learn
biology

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

 

[Ventura77]

white centrics do the same thing that black centrics do. ----
from the standpoint of BIOLOGY------both are worthless.
A person of any group, or creed or nation or "race" can learn
biology

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

stupid is as stupid does...

 

[Asclepias]

white centrics do the same thing that black centrics do. ----
from the standpoint of BIOLOGY------both are worthless.
A person of any group, or creed or nation or "race" can learn
biology

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

No youre talking about the mixed so called Arabs. These are the same arabs that enslaved whites in europe for sexual pleasure. The first Arabs were Black people.

Haha, so which invasions turned the first Black Arabs into the present Arabs?
There was no such invasion.
You'rre really desperate, and dumb, and hardly Human.

Read Gert Mullers research. He is a white German dude. I posted the link for everyone.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

white centrics do the same thing that black centrics do. ----
from the standpoint of BIOLOGY------both are worthless.
A person of any group, or creed or nation or "race" can learn
biology

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

 

[Asclepias]

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

Nubia conquered Egypt as well. Thats like saying me and my brother got into a fight and one of us won.

When the smart Jewish slaves left with Moses, they had to bring inferiors from the south.

Thats just a story. There is no proof the Black Hebrews were enslaved in Egypt. There is no proof anyone wandered the desert for 40 years either.

But, I thought you said these biblical stories were proof of Blacks in North Africa, and the Near-East?

The stories are proof. You can write a science fiction book like say Harry Potter and describe the people as you see in everyday life. Why would all their stories describe Black people if they were white? Dont you think that would be kind of weird?

 

[Asclepias]

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

 

[irosie91]

I know all about biology irosie. You are just stupidly assigning the same motivations to separate people with separate reasons for doing what they are doing.

Racial differences do exist

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

jews made a huge contribution to Poland-----the art of distilling
wine goes all the way back to the Talmud times-----in Babylon-----the technique is discussed in the Babylonian Talmud-------I know that you are grateful

 

[Asclepias]

Racial differences do exist
Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

jews made a huge contribution to Poland-----the art of distilling
wine goes all the way back to the Talmud times-----in Babylon-----the technique is discussed in the Babylonian Talmud-------I know that you are grateful

Rosie. Who founded Babylon? According to the Talmud?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Racial differences do exist
Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

 

[Ventura77]

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Could be since they ruled Egypt as well.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

This is actually dead wrong..
No pre-contact sub-Saharan African society ever created even a written language, or weaved cloth, or forged steel, or invented the wheel, or plow, or devised a calendar, or code of laws, or any social organization, or system of measurement, or math, or built a multi-story structure, or sewer, or infrastructure of any kind.

They never drilled a well or irrigated or created any agriculture, or built a road, or sea-worthy vessel. They never domesticated animals, or exploited underground natural resources, or produced anything that could be considered a mechanical device. Blacks were still living in the Stone Age when Whites discovered them just 400 years ago. Blacks are the oldest race, so they should be the most advanced — but they never advanced at all. Blacks lived alone in Africa, a vast continent with temperate climates and abundant resources for 60,000 years; so they cannot blame racism, colonialism, culture, environment, or anything else for their failures. 19 of the 20 poorest countries are sub-Saharan African (Haiti). There has never been a successful Black nation. The only successful African nations were White-governed (Rhodesia, South Africa). No modern creations or civilization exists in sub-Saharan Africa that was not brought there by Whites. There are no White Third-World nations, but all Black ones are. Put Whites on an island and you get England; put Asians on an island and you get Japan; put Blacks on an island and you get Haiti. Nowhere Blacks live are they considered achievers. Blacks are universally viewed as unproductive and disruptive to society. Simply, life is an IQ test. All Black civilization is in fact transplanted White civilization. No Black society has ever independently developed and maintained its own technological way of life..

Who told you it was wrong? Multiple sources point to the fact that Blacks created civilizations long before whites became self aware and stopped living in caves. How do you think the Nile got diverted? How about the Great Pyramids of Egypt and the Pyramids in Nubia?

..and naturally you just neglected to post any proof of your assertions...right? According to your unproven theory Blacks regressed from this elevated pre-white position of cultural dominance and declined to the point where the languish today...right Spanky? Blacks have the lowest average IQ and the most violent propensity---hardly a winning combo however it does explain why Africa has been in tribal turmoil for its entire history in spite of the wealth of natural resources and minerals...

 

[Ventura77]

Egypt conquered Nubia.

Nubia conquered Egypt as well. Thats like saying me and my brother got into a fight and one of us won.

When the smart Jewish slaves left with Moses, they had to bring inferiors from the south.

Thats just a story. There is no proof the Black Hebrews were enslaved in Egypt. There is no proof anyone wandered the desert for 40 years either.

But, I thought you said these biblical stories were proof of Blacks in North Africa, and the Near-East?

The stories are proof. You can write a science fiction book like say Harry Potter and describe the people as you see in everyday life. Why would all their stories describe Black people if they were white? Dont you think that would be kind of weird?

LMAO!!!! 'the stories are proof'???? You haven't the faintest idea of the raw pulp you spout...good grief if you are interested in this subject enough to indulge your febrile ignorance don't you owe yourself a brief stab at education amigo?

 

[Asclepias]

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

Where did you get E1b1b? Thats not correct.

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

 

[Ventura77]

Racial differences do exist
Actually the Semitic Arabs had formulated many concepts of race before Whites had.

the semitic arabs are racially WHITE-----mostly------"arabs" ---being the early slave traders-----who harvested most of the slaves they traded from among subsaharans-----are extensively "mixed" with "blacks. In general---your sentence makes no sense. Semitic ARABS did not have an alphabet until about 300 AD and did not leave records----thus WHAT DA HELL are you mumbling about?

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

No shit Sherlock...

 

[Asclepias]

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

Egypt conquered Nubia.

not exactly-----Egyptians and Nubians were "interacting"
for millennia--------where there is "interaction" between
human beans-------there results HYBRID human beans

Drop the colorblind racism. You can't understand it is whites who created the concept of race. What we are doing is defending the reality that blacks existed in places like Egypt and that blacks actually did have advanced civilizations or at least civilizations equal to any white one.

This is actually dead wrong..
No pre-contact sub-Saharan African society ever created even a written language, or weaved cloth, or forged steel, or invented the wheel, or plow, or devised a calendar, or code of laws, or any social organization, or system of measurement, or math, or built a multi-story structure, or sewer, or infrastructure of any kind.

They never drilled a well or irrigated or created any agriculture, or built a road, or sea-worthy vessel. They never domesticated animals, or exploited underground natural resources, or produced anything that could be considered a mechanical device. Blacks were still living in the Stone Age when Whites discovered them just 400 years ago. Blacks are the oldest race, so they should be the most advanced — but they never advanced at all. Blacks lived alone in Africa, a vast continent with temperate climates and abundant resources for 60,000 years; so they cannot blame racism, colonialism, culture, environment, or anything else for their failures. 19 of the 20 poorest countries are sub-Saharan African (Haiti). There has never been a successful Black nation. The only successful African nations were White-governed (Rhodesia, South Africa). No modern creations or civilization exists in sub-Saharan Africa that was not brought there by Whites. There are no White Third-World nations, but all Black ones are. Put Whites on an island and you get England; put Asians on an island and you get Japan; put Blacks on an island and you get Haiti. Nowhere Blacks live are they considered achievers. Blacks are universally viewed as unproductive and disruptive to society. Simply, life is an IQ test. All Black civilization is in fact transplanted White civilization. No Black society has ever independently developed and maintained its own technological way of life..

Who told you it was wrong? Multiple sources point to the fact that Blacks created civilizations long before whites became self aware and stopped living in caves. How do you think the Nile got diverted? How about the Great Pyramids of Egypt and the Pyramids in Nubia?

..and naturally you just neglected to post any proof of your assertions...right? According to your unproven theory Blacks regressed from this elevated pre-white position of cultural dominance and declined to the point where the languish today...right Spanky? Blacks have the lowest average IQ and the most violent propensity---hardly a winning combo however it does explain why Africa has been in tribal turmoil for its entire history in spite of the wealth of natural resources and minerals...

I already posted my "proof" not that I need to prove anything to you. If youre still riding the IQ thing I already explained its been proven whites lack the intelligence to come up with a test that accurately measures intelligence.

 

[Ventura77]

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

Where did you E1b1b? Thats not correct.

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

lite advice: if you are pre-disposed to tell some they are wrong, please offer more than your ego...LOL

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Arabs aren't White people, but unfortunately are Caucasoid.

What difference would it make that Arabs came up with a alphabet in 300 AD, or not?

The concept of race was largely formulated much later, considering much of Sub-Saharan Africa was unexplored at 300 AD.

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

Where did you E1b1b? Thats not correct.

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

You article admits that Ashkenazi Jews are basically when Semitic men met Italian women, there might be some German,Polish, or Russian DNA in Ashkenazi Jews, but it's just minimal.

 

[Asclepias]

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

Where did you E1b1b? Thats not correct.

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

lite advice: if you are pre-disposed to tell some they are wrong, please offer more than your ego...LOL

You cant give me any advice. That would be like me taking advice from a retarded chimp.

 

[Asclepias]

check your bottle for contamination with methanol----you are babbling again

You Jews aren't unlike Negroes, both are obnoxious big mouths.

You can tell by how many Jews have curly hair, that you have the blood of Negroes flowing through you.

Jews are not the original Hebrews. They are european converts. Ashkenazis.

Ashkeanzi Jews are largely E1b1b haplogroup like North, and East Africans, and J haplogroup like Arabs.
The maternal DNA is mostly Italian.

All putrid Mediterranean's, a mistake upon Humanity.

Where did you E1b1b? Thats not correct.

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

You article admits that Ashkenazi Jews are basically when Semitic men met Italian women, there might be some German,Polish, or Russian DNA in Ashkenazi Jews, but it's just minimal.

Where does it say its minimal?

"
The team found that four founders were responsible for 40 percent of Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA, and that all of these founders originated in Europe. The majority of the remaining people could be traced to other European lineages.

All told, more than 80 percent of the maternal lineages of Ashkenazi Jews could be traced to Europe, with only a few lineages originating in the Near East."