If Obama didn't rescue Americans dying inBenghazi,how can we trust to rescue Syrians?

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,410
Obama is now tellng us that the use of chemical weapons in Syria crosses a "red line" (one he didn't draw, he emphasizes). The Syrian people obviously need outside help.

But, the last time someone needed outside military help, was Sept. 11, 2012. The place was Benghazi, Libya. And the people being killed, were American citizens. One was even our Ambassador to Libya. The attacks lasted 8 hours, and we had reinforcements only an hour away by air. Those troops were actually walking toward the aircraft to go to the rescue of our consulate personnel, when the order came from high up, to get out of the aircraft and go back to the barracks.

Benghazi Terror Attack: CIA Operatives Told Twice to Stand Down During Fight, Plot Thickens

Strangely, it's never been established who gave that order, to cease efforts to rescue Americans under attack in Libya. In fact, the entire chain of events for the Commander in Chief, and his top foreign-relations official, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, remains shrouded in mystery. Even more strangely, the thirty people who were in or near the consulate when the attacks were going on, have not said a word about what happened.

Now Obama wants us to go to the rescue of people under attack with chemical weapons, in another country in that part of the world.

Considering his apparently complete lack of leadership or even presence during the last set of attacks, and his (or someone's) refusal to send troops to rescue Americans who were being killed by terrorists... how on Earth can we trust him to go to the aid of the Syrian people?
 
I wouldn't depend on Obama to rescue anyone. I fear for my life and the lives of my family under this clueless tyrant.
 
obama only intends to rescue terrorists.

Like Bin Laden. Oh wait, it was Republicans who let Bin Laden go.

No matter how many times right wingers try to paint Obama as something he isn't, it was Republican George Bush who let Bin Laden go. It was Republicans who stopped looking for him and it was this Democratic President that took him out. Even though it was in Pakistan where Republicans said we shouldn't go. If it were up to Republicans, Bin Laden would sill be living in that villa.
 
Today Obama is preaching about CREDIBILITY.

Well Mr. President, THIS is the credibility that matters.

Had you not bullshitted the American people about THIS Youtube video for political purposes, you might have more credibility with the American people today.

This was your ironclad intelligence you tried to sell us LAST September 11.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LcBZf6sp1g"]President Obama Blames Benghazi on a Video - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Liz Trotta gave a compelling commentary this morning on the same argument...can't find the video anywhere yet.
 
obama only intends to rescue terrorists.

Like Bin Laden. Oh wait, it was Republicans who let Bin Laden go.

No matter how many times right wingers try to paint Obama as something he isn't, it was Republican George Bush who let Bin Laden go. It was Republicans who stopped looking for him and it was this Democratic President that took him out. Even though it was in Pakistan where Republicans said we shouldn't go. If it were up to Republicans, Bin Laden would sill be living in that villa.

Bin Laden!

You mean that old guy who was on the last legs anyway, holed up in a Pakistani safe house?

It was the procedures that George Bush set up that caught Bin Laden. Whether it was up to Republicans or not, Bin Laden would be dead today.

It's not like getting Chris Stevens killed.
 
If Obama didn't rescue Americans dying inBenghazi,how can we trust to rescue Syrians?

Because it’s a lie Obama ‘didn’t rescue Americans.’

Just as it’s a lie to say Obama wants to start a war in Syria, or send in American troops, or is seeking an ‘open ended’ commitment.

You and others on the right don’t trust Obama for purely partisan reasons, having nothing to do with the merits of a limited military strike.

Consequently your ‘reasoning’ is flawed, being predicated on a false assumption.
 
To the OP. He isn't there to rescue Syrians. He's there to turn it into a Sunni ran death trap with Saudi and Quatar running the show. He's there for Iran.
 
If Obama didn't rescue Americans dying inBenghazi,how can we trust to rescue Syrians?

Because it’s a lie Obama ‘didn’t rescue Americans.’

Just as it’s a lie to say Obama wants to start a war in Syria, or send in American troops, or is seeking an ‘open ended’ commitment.

You and others on the right don’t trust Obama for purely partisan reasons, having nothing to do with the merits of a limited military strike.

Consequently your ‘reasoning’ is flawed, being predicated on a false assumption.

One of the points of the OP is that this is not his first rodeo...people have other examples to determine whether or not he is "trustworthy".
 
If Obama didn't rescue Americans dying inBenghazi,how can we trust to rescue Syrians?

Because it’s a lie Obama ‘didn’t rescue Americans.’
Typical liberal-sycophant response: When cornered by a fact you can't refute, simply deny, deny, deny.

If Obama wasn't the one giving the orders on whether rescue troops should cease efforts to reinforce the Americans under attack, then the situation is even worse than we have been told. Not that we've been told all that much about what he was doing while all this was going on.
 
If Obama didn't rescue Americans dying inBenghazi,how can we trust to rescue Syrians?

Because it’s a lie Obama ‘didn’t rescue Americans.’

Just as it’s a lie to say Obama wants to start a war in Syria, or send in American troops, or is seeking an ‘open ended’ commitment.

You and others on the right don’t trust Obama for purely partisan reasons, having nothing to do with the merits of a limited military strike.

Consequently your ‘reasoning’ is flawed, being predicated on a false assumption.

You left out the one about Obama supporting al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood and being behind the murder of Christians.
 
Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya Gregory Hicks was on ABC's This Week this morning...

He said there was NO mention of a Youtube video or protests to or from Washington.

That the Youtube video was a "non-event" in Libya.

He also stated that he believes that at least two of the Americans could have been saved if the State Department and Administration in Washington had chosen to act.

Watch the video here...Gregory Hicks: Hearing of Death of Christopher Stevens ?Saddest Moment? in My Career - ABC News

It's a roughly 10 minute interview.
 
Today Obama is preaching about CREDIBILITY.

Well Mr. President, THIS is the credibility that matters.

Had you not bullshitted the American people about THIS Youtube video for political purposes, you might have more credibility with the American people today.

This was your ironclad intelligence you tried to sell us LAST September 11.

9/16/12 Obama Administration Blaming YouTube Video for 9/11/12 Embassy Attacks - YouTube

President Obama Blames Benghazi on a Video - YouTube

You are exactly right. He's a liar. Liars gonna lie.
 
Obama was not responsible for the failed Benghazi rescue. He is only at fault for lying about the reason for the attacks in his campaign to win the election. Lying is what politicians do during election season "silly season".

Romney-cartoon-double-speak.gif
 
Obama was not responsible for the failed Benghazi rescue. He is only at fault for lying about the reason for the attacks in his campaign to win the election. Lying is what politicians do during election season "silly season".

Romney-cartoon-double-speak.gif

What failed Benghazi rescue mission? There wasn't one attempted that I know of. Obama is responsible for their not being a rescue mission.

Obama can order two hundred cruise missiles to kill more Syrians, but couldn't be bothered to send a single aircraft to rescue the murdered Benghazi Ambassador and crew.
 
and why didn't anyone ever send "Special Forces" to take out the murders in South Chicago over the last two years?
 

Forum List

Back
Top