If the Justice Dept and our institutions weren’t corrupted and hijacked by the Democrats

[JoeB131]

They didn’t lie and their statements didn’t break any laws.

Hiding negative info from the voters before the election isn't a crime?

They didn't have information. They had an opinion.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They didn't have information. They had an opinion.

Hiding the negative info on the laptop from the voters.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hiding the negative info on the laptop from the voters.

A bizarre thing to say, given the emails they talked about had already been made.public.

I think maybe you're running out of talking points.

 

[JoeB131]

Hiding the negative info on the laptop from the voters.

Except they did no such thing. Everyone heard about the laptop.

They expressed an opinion that it was fake. They are entitled to their opinion.

now, if they had knowledge that it was real, and took money to say otherwise, then you MIGHT have a case of election interference.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Except they did no such thing. Everyone heard about the laptop.

They expressed an opinion that it was fake. They are entitled to their opinion.

now, if they had knowledge that it was real, and took money to say otherwise, then you MIGHT have a case of election interference.

And they heard from those "experts" that it was probably fake.

They expressed an opinion that it was fake. They are entitled to their opinion.

And if their opinion helped hide damaging info before an election, that's a crime, right?

 

[AntonToo]

And they heard from those "experts" that it was probably fake.

They expressed an opinion that it was fake. They are entitled to their opinion.

And if their opinion helped hide damaging info before an election, that's a crime, right?

No, not right.

There is no crime in stating your opinion.

 

[JoeB131]

And they heard from those "experts" that it was probably fake.

They expressed an opinion that it was fake. They are entitled to their opinion.

And if their opinion helped hide damaging info before an election, that's a crime, right?

Nope,

I'd tell you to keep trying, but you are just embarrassing yourself now.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, not right.

There is no crime in stating your opinion.

One minute leftists say it's a crime, the next they say it's perfectly fine.

 

[AntonToo]

One minute leftists say it's a crime, the next they say it's perfectly fine.

Todd you can't tell your face from your ass, so when we talk about faces and asses you keep on thinking we are talking about the same thing.

Thing one is commiting crimiminal acts to help your campaign, which is ILLICIT ELECTIONEERING.
Thing two is stating your opinion publicly, which is at worst LEGAL ELECTIONEERING.

One is not the other.

 

[Marener]

Hiding negative info from the voters before the election isn't a crime?

There was no “hiding” anything. It’s just some citizens giving their opinion on a news story.

 

[Roudy]

I didn't say it was Russian propaganda, idiot.

I said that neither the shop owner or anyone else has the right to copy data from the laptop.

Learn to read, dipshit!

It’s validity is not even up for debate any longer. Hunter already admitted to most of what was in the laptop in his book, dipstick.

 

[Roudy]

The Jordan-Turner letter connects this to social media companies blocking or limiting the sharing of the story, saying of the Oct. 19 statement, “Social media companies simultaneously restricted access to the [New York] Post story.”

But the letter appears to have omitted key context, including whether Blinken actually pushed for such a statement.

On Friday afternoon, House Democrats released an excerpt from Morell’s interview in which Morell actually addressed that. Asked whether Blinken had directed, suggested or insinuated that he should write such a statement, Morell said, “My memory is that he did not.”

“Mr. Morell testified that Mr. Blinken did not hint that the Biden campaign ‘could use some help on this’ or suggest that Mr. Morell should ‘cook up something’ that the campaign should use,” the House Judiciary Democrats said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/21/hunter-biden-laptop-jim-jordan/

Bullshit:

Republicans Release Report on How Senior Intelligence Community Officials and the Biden Campaign Worked to Mislead American Voters

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Chairmen Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Michael Turner (R-OH) released a joint interim staff

judiciary.house.gov

 

[Roudy]

Shitforbrains thinks Hunters laptop is a Russian plant.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[Marener]

It’s validity is not even up for debate any longer. Hunter already admitted to most of what was in the laptop in his book, dipstick.

Back when the story broke, the information was unverified and highly suspicious.

Any sane person would be cautious before believing it. That’s all they said.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was no “hiding” anything. It’s just some citizens giving their opinion on a news story.

Facebook and Twitter were hiding it.

 

[Marener]

Facebook and Twitter were hiding it.

That’s their right as private media organizations and is not the subject of the thread.

The subject is the letter from former intelligence officials, and they merely gave their opinion.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That’s their right as private media organizations and is not the subject of the thread.

The subject is the letter from former intelligence officials, and they merely gave their opinion.

I know, they have a right to interfere in an election by hiding damaging info from voters.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I know, they have a right to interfere in an election by hiding damaging info from voters.

They have a right not to broadcast something.

You're getting all caught up.

 

[Marener]

I know, they have a right to interfere in an election by hiding damaging info from voters.

Media organizations have no legal requirement to publicize any story.

That’s not interference. It’s a free press.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Media organizations have no legal requirement to publicize any story.

That’s not interference. It’s a free press.

The free press is allowed to interfere in elections?