If you are HONEST, you are AGNOSTIC

[Frannie]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

In that absence of evidence, any belief is as good as another. Therefore, the best thing to do is go with whatever feels right to you.

This guy believes that his God is going to kill the entire world

 

[WheelieAddict]

I'm honest and Deist

 

[diver52]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

In that absence of evidence, any belief is as good as another. Therefore, the best thing to do is go with whatever feels right to you.

This guy believes that his God is going to kill the entire world

So? As long as he doesn't expect me to believe it I have no issues with that.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Do you believe that billions of lines of code could create themselves? or would an intelligence be needed

The same intelligence created everything.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Do you believe that billions of lines of code could create themselves? or would an intelligence be needed

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Nope, I know God created anything

That is called "faith", not fact.

Faith usually is based on facts.

Faith is having complete trust in something or someone. I don’t put complete trust in anything without good reason. Included in that reasoning are facts. So I completely agree with you.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

In that absence of evidence, any belief is as good as another. Therefore, the best thing to do is go with whatever feels right to you.

Lots of very bad things can feel right to some people. I don’t think that doing whatever feels right to you is a good philosophy. A better philosophy is to do the right thing the right way for the right reasons.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Do you believe that billions of lines of code could create themselves? or would an intelligence be needed

It’s not impossible. But even if it was it still occurred according to the laws of nature which existed before space and time. So God is still the source or matrix.

 

[ding]

Do you believe that billions of lines of code could create themselves?

Sure, why not?

How do they assemble themselves from nothing? Do you think that windows 10 could assemble itself in a pond without programmers?

LOL grow up

Chance.

The programming occurred when the potential for life and intelligence was programmed into the laws of nature before space and time existed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How do they assemble themselves from nothing?

"From nothing"... What? What a silly question.

It is assembled by very gradual changes over trillions of trillions of chemical reactions over billions of years.

Youre not asking a "stumper!", my man. We already know the answer to this.

 

[ding]

And you have evidence of God programming DNA?

Yes because programming is the result of intelligence. DNA has the same ability to write itself as a computer operating system

So is creating the material world.

Nope because the world is not programming.

Are you a DARPA project

Neither is DNA.

DNA is most certainly the program for life. This is not disputable, the only question is where did the program come from

The creator of existence who programmed life into the laws of nature.

 

[ding]

How do they assemble themselves from nothing?

"From nothing"... What? What a silly question.

It is assembled by very gradual changes over trillions of trillions of chemical reactions over billions of years.

Youre not asking a "stumper!", my man. We already know the answer to this.

I doubt there was anything gradual about the folding of the long chains.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Do you believe that billions of lines of code could create themselves? or would an intelligence be needed

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Nope, I know God created anything

That is called "faith", not fact.

Faith usually is based on facts.

Faith is believing without needing facts. I have no problem with someone having faith. But let's not pretend it is based on facts. You believe God created everything because your religious beliefs tell you that.

Wrong. Faith is having complete trust in something or someone. No where in that definition does it say no facts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How do they assemble themselves from nothing?

"From nothing"... What? What a silly question.

It is assembled by very gradual changes over trillions of trillions of chemical reactions over billions of years.

Youre not asking a "stumper!", my man. We already know the answer to this.

I doubt there was anything gradual about the folding of the long chains.

What was gradual was the operation of selection on the myriad forms, causing the more successful models to persist.

Now, come on ding, you could have puzzled that out for yourself.

 

[ding]

Prove DNA was programmed by God.

I already did

No you didn’t. Your argument consisted of how else did it happen.

Blind luck is the other alternative. Chance.

You are free to believe that billions of lines of DNA that can only be in one specific order to work arranged itself without intelligence

I choose otherwise and you cant change or alter shit, though you can continue flinging your shit like a monkey in the zoo

First of all it’s not billions of lines of DNA in a single cell organism. Secondly there are no lines of code. That’s not how it works.

And lastly to believe God programmed DNA but did not create existence is incompatible and has more holes than your drawers.

DNA is a base 4 code as binary code used here is base 2

In DNA, there are four different bases: adenine (A) and guanine (G) are the larger purines. Cytosine (C) and thymine (T)

In binary code there are two bases, 0 and 1, or positive and negative or open and closed

Try again kid

And none of that addresses your incongruity of believing that God programmed DNA but did not create existence. You have a hole in your model the size of a Big Bang because you do not reconcile the creation of the universe with the creation of life.

 

[ding]

How do they assemble themselves from nothing?

"From nothing"... What? What a silly question.

It is assembled by very gradual changes over trillions of trillions of chemical reactions over billions of years.

Youre not asking a "stumper!", my man. We already know the answer to this.

I doubt there was anything gradual about the folding of the long chains.

What was gradual was the operation of selection on the myriad forms, causing the more successful models to persist.

Now, come on ding, you could have puzzled that out for yourself.

Stop acting like a putz.

What you are describing is cosmic, stellar and chemical evolution. Yes, it occurred over billions of years. The leap from chemical to biological didn’t.

You have an intense desire to see yourself as superior to others. That’s not a good thing and it will result in unpredictable surprises.

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Nope, I know God created anything

How’s that?

By examining the material world.

 

[Frannie]

I already did

No you didn’t. Your argument consisted of how else did it happen.

Blind luck is the other alternative. Chance.

You are free to believe that billions of lines of DNA that can only be in one specific order to work arranged itself without intelligence

I choose otherwise and you cant change or alter shit, though you can continue flinging your shit like a monkey in the zoo

First of all it’s not billions of lines of DNA in a single cell organism. Secondly there are no lines of code. That’s not how it works.

And lastly to believe God programmed DNA but did not create existence is incompatible and has more holes than your drawers.

DNA is a base 4 code as binary code used here is base 2

In DNA, there are four different bases: adenine (A) and guanine (G) are the larger purines. Cytosine (C) and thymine (T)

In binary code there are two bases, 0 and 1, or positive and negative or open and closed

Try again kid

And none of that addresses your incongruity of believing that God programmed DNA but did not create existence. You have a hole in your model the size of a Big Bang because you do not reconcile the creation of the universe with the creation of life.

DNA is a complex code that directs the building of matter. Nothing at all supports your belief that God created the universe 13 billion years ago out of nothing...

Lol, how did Adam get the word about this, was Adam there 13 billion years ago

Take your pills kiddy

 

[ding]

AGNOSTICISM is about your HONEST perceptions and interpretations of your own experiences. If you cannot see beyond the horizon, you don’t pretend you do.

Of course, you can gather information from credible sources who have seen something beyond YOUR horizon, but that is tentative information that could be a basis for your belief(s).

No one credible to me has ANY information about Earth’s origins. We can only theorize based on patterns of evidence from various credible sources. Beyond that ...

If you are not agnostic, you are playing a make believe game. If so, you have faith in fantasy instead of reality, in my opinion.

Can you explain who created Universe?
Surely not?
Therefore I believe in God as its creator

So because you don’t know, it defaults to an invisible being?

Nope, I know God created anything

How’s that?

Its another word salad, be happy it makes no sense to you

Examining the material world is a word salad?

 

[Frannie]

How do they assemble themselves from nothing?

"From nothing"... What? What a silly question.

It is assembled by very gradual changes over trillions of trillions of chemical reactions over billions of years.

Youre not asking a "stumper!", my man. We already know the answer to this.

I doubt there was anything gradual about the folding of the long chains.

What was gradual was the operation of selection on the myriad forms, causing the more successful models to persist.

Now, come on ding, you could have puzzled that out for yourself.

Stop acting like a putz.

What you are describing is cosmic, stellar and chemical evolution. Yes, it occurred over billions of years. The leap from chemical to biological didn’t.

You have an intense desire to see yourself as superior to others. That’s not a good thing and it will result in unpredictable surprises.

You dont act like a putz because u r a putz

 

[ding]

No you didn’t. Your argument consisted of how else did it happen.

Blind luck is the other alternative. Chance.

You are free to believe that billions of lines of DNA that can only be in one specific order to work arranged itself without intelligence

I choose otherwise and you cant change or alter shit, though you can continue flinging your shit like a monkey in the zoo

First of all it’s not billions of lines of DNA in a single cell organism. Secondly there are no lines of code. That’s not how it works.

And lastly to believe God programmed DNA but did not create existence is incompatible and has more holes than your drawers.

DNA is a base 4 code as binary code used here is base 2

In DNA, there are four different bases: adenine (A) and guanine (G) are the larger purines. Cytosine (C) and thymine (T)

In binary code there are two bases, 0 and 1, or positive and negative or open and closed

Try again kid

And none of that addresses your incongruity of believing that God programmed DNA but did not create existence. You have a hole in your model the size of a Big Bang because you do not reconcile the creation of the universe with the creation of life.

DNA is a complex code that directs the building of matter. Nothing at all supports your belief that God created the universe 13 billion years ago out of nothing...

Lol, how did Adam get the word about this, was Adam there 13 billion years ago

Take your pills kiddy

I don’t think that it’s you couldn’t understand my point as much as it is you have no good response to my point. So you post something which has absolutely nothing to do with the hole in your beliefs.