If you are HONEST, you are AGNOSTIC

[Frannie]

Can you demonstrate ponds and sun writing the hundreds of thousands of lines of code needed for a one celled life form?

Yawn, kid this argument is hundreds of years old at least and God is being proved by science every day

There are not lines of code.

DNA is a base 4 code

Base Pair

There are no written lines of code.

DNA is a molecular code, its writing with molecules or the language of life. Way over your tadpole head

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

 

[ding]

There are not lines of code.

DNA is a base 4 code

Base Pair

There are no written lines of code.

DNA is a molecular code, its writing with molecules or the language of life. Way over your tadpole head

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

 

[Frannie]

DNA is a base 4 code

Base Pair

There are no written lines of code.

DNA is a molecular code, its writing with molecules or the language of life. Way over your tadpole head

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

 

[BreezeWood]

.

the above is the typewriter for dna ... and everything in the universe. your dilemma is not dna but the elements. the consequence of the sun's influence on the pond.


There also might be millions ...

not anywhere near by what difference would that make.

Can you demonstrate ponds and sun writing the hundreds of thousands of lines of code needed for a one celled life form?

Yawn, kid this argument is hundreds of years old at least and God is being proved by science every day

.

Can you demonstrate ponds and sun writing the hundreds of thousands of lines of code needed for a one celled life form?

that was answered previously ...

the above is the typewriter for dna ... and everything in the universe.

are you claiming dna is comprised of something other than the elements of the periodic table ... your misunderstanding for their purpose.

God is being proved by science every day

are you endorsing the christian book of forgeries or the other two primary desert religions ... all that have abandoned the religion of antiquity. there are many metaphysical gods, one Almighty.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

It's not possible

.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

win 10 is manufactured using the same process as well you are comparing apples with oranges the mainframes are not relative. they both come from the same source.

not providing your programmer mutes the discussion, the metaphysical is not only capable of constructing dna but did so. as I said your dilemma is the periodic table not dna.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

 

[Frannie]

Can you demonstrate ponds and sun writing the hundreds of thousands of lines of code needed for a one celled life form?

Yawn, kid this argument is hundreds of years old at least and God is being proved by science every day

.

Can you demonstrate ponds and sun writing the hundreds of thousands of lines of code needed for a one celled life form?

that was answered previously ...

the above is the typewriter for dna ... and everything in the universe.

are you claiming dna is comprised of something other than the elements of the periodic table ... your misunderstanding for their purpose.

God is being proved by science every day

are you endorsing the christian book of forgeries or the other two primary desert religions ... all that have abandoned the religion of antiquity. there are many metaphysical gods, one Almighty.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

It's not possible

.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

win 10 is manufactured using the same process as well you are comparing apples with oranges the mainframes are not relative. they both come from the same source.

not providing your programmer mutes the discussion, the metaphysical is not only capable of constructing dna but did so. as I said your dilemma is the periodic table not dna.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

 

[ding]

There are no written lines of code.

DNA is a molecular code, its writing with molecules or the language of life. Way over your tadpole head

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
that was answered previously ...

are you claiming dna is comprised of something other than the elements of the periodic table ... your misunderstanding for their purpose.


are you endorsing the christian book of forgeries or the other two primary desert religions ... all that have abandoned the religion of antiquity. there are many metaphysical gods, one Almighty.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

It's not possible

.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

win 10 is manufactured using the same process as well you are comparing apples with oranges the mainframes are not relative. they both come from the same source.

not providing your programmer mutes the discussion, the metaphysical is not only capable of constructing dna but did so. as I said your dilemma is the periodic table not dna.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

 

[Frannie]

DNA is a molecular code, its writing with molecules or the language of life. Way over your tadpole head

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

 

[Frannie]

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

It's not possible

.

Actually the statistical probability that DNA formed in a pond is statistically equal to win 10 forming in the same pond.

win 10 is manufactured using the same process as well you are comparing apples with oranges the mainframes are not relative. they both come from the same source.

not providing your programmer mutes the discussion, the metaphysical is not only capable of constructing dna but did so. as I said your dilemma is the periodic table not dna.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

Try hard, Vaseline helps

 

[BreezeWood]

.
win 10 is manufactured using the same process as well you are comparing apples with oranges the mainframes are not relative. they both come from the same source.

not providing your programmer mutes the discussion, the metaphysical is not only capable of constructing dna but did so. as I said your dilemma is the periodic table not dna.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

Try hard, Vaseline helps

.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

you definitely are missing something - water did not produce the code,

* the code was written by the periodic table ... keyboard.


how about blurry vision, are you having trouble focusing it would seem so by your lack of comprehension.

 

[Frannie]

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null. Your claim is that the pond wrote win 10...... by creating humans first

Possibility null

.

Actually the statistical probability is equal or null.

non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

Try hard, Vaseline helps

.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

you definitely are missing something - water did not produce the code,

* the code was written by the periodic table ... keyboard.


how about blurry vision, are you having trouble focusing it would seem so by your lack of comprehension.

Water is on the periodic table as H and O.

Next moronic assertion

You are putting the same weight on molecular bonds that atoms form as you are on complicated code that directs the building of pumps that push fluids against the force of gravity and create Carbon semiconductors that create chemical reactions to power the electrical brain.

The above comment could continue for billions of lines of which none happen randomely

 

[ding]

I’m sure you believe it is.

What’s your background in science again?

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

 

[Frannie]

Seriously kid, everyone but you knows that DNA is a genetic code

Genetic code

Genetic code
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.

Specifically, the code defines a mapping between tri-nucleotide sequences called codons and amino acids; every triplet of nucleotides in a nucleic acid sequence specifies a single amino acid.

Because the vast majority of genes are encoded with exactly the same code, this particular code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic code, or simply the genetic code, though in fact there are many variant codes; thus, the canonical genetic code is not universal.

For example, in humans, protein synthesis in mitochondria relies on a genetic code that varies from the canonical code.

The genome of an organism is inscribed in DNA, or in some viruses RNA.

The portion of the genome that codes for a protein or an RNA is referred to as a gene.

Those genes that code for proteins are composed of tri-nucleotide units called codons, each coding for a single amino acid.

Each nucleotide sub-unit consists of a phosphate, deoxyribose sugar and one of the 4 nitrogenous nucleotide bases.

The purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G) are larger and consist of two aromatic rings.

The pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T) are smaller and consist of only one aromatic ring.

In the double-helix configuration, two strands of DNA are joined to each other by hydrogen bonds in an arrangement known as base pairing.

These bonds almost always form between an adenine base on one strand and a thymine on the other strand and between a cytosine base on one strand and a guanine base on the other.

This means that the number of A and T residues will be the same in a given double helix as will the number of G and C residues.

In RNA, thymine (T) is replaced by uracil (U), and the deoxyribose is substituted by ribose.

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

 

[ding]

So you have zero background in science. That’s what I thought.

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

You just admitted you don’t know.

I win again.

 

[Frannie]

Dude every high school kid knows that DNA is the genetic code. You are clearly being schizophrenic again

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

You just admitted you don’t know.

I win again.

Actually you do not know how DNA formed either, your belief that you do makes you mentally incompetent.

What I have said is that code can not write itself you are so ignorant as to claim that the genetic code is not a code.

So tell us what is it professor

We need to know

PS what did u win

 

[ding]

Which is all the education you have on science.

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

You just admitted you don’t know.

I win again.

Actually you do not know how DNA formed either, your belief that you do makes you mentally incompetent.

What I have said is that code can not write itself you are so ignorant as to claim that the genetic code is not a code.

So tell us what is it professor

We need to know

PS what did u win

I won your pride.

I keep telling you that no code was written. DNA is effectively a set of instructions that exists as a part of life itself. The laws of nature are also a set of instructions. Neither set of instructions are written instructions.

You accept that intelligence is required for DNA to exist but reject that intelligence is required for the laws of nature to exist. That’s an indefensible position.

 

[Taz]

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

You just admitted you don’t know.

I win again.

Actually you do not know how DNA formed either, your belief that you do makes you mentally incompetent.

What I have said is that code can not write itself you are so ignorant as to claim that the genetic code is not a code.

So tell us what is it professor

We need to know

PS what did u win

I won your pride.

I keep telling you that no code was written. DNA is effectively a set of instructions that exists as a part of life itself. The laws of nature are also a set of instructions. Neither set of instructions are written instructions.

You accept that intelligence is required for DNA to exist but reject that intelligence is required for the laws of nature to exist. That’s an indefensible position.

 

[Frannie]

Actually I knew that DNA was a code in the sixth grade, everyone does except you.

Tell us now, does a person need be a scientist or programmer to know that win 10 is a code?

Or can a 5 year old know this?

You are mentally less than 5 years old

Did God use a computer to write this code?

Tell me how God wrote this code?

What material did he start with? How did he put the code into it?

Good questions actually, which are being studied.

Funny how schizophrenics demand to know everything about everything but know nothing

No take your pills

For the record it is not known how DNA came to be, but it is known that only intelligence creates codes

You just admitted you don’t know.

I win again.

Actually you do not know how DNA formed either, your belief that you do makes you mentally incompetent.

What I have said is that code can not write itself you are so ignorant as to claim that the genetic code is not a code.

So tell us what is it professor

We need to know

PS what did u win

I won your pride.

I keep telling you that no code was written. DNA is effectively a set of instructions that exists as a part of life itself. The laws of nature are also a set of instructions. Neither set of instructions are written instructions.

You accept that intelligence is required for DNA to exist but reject that intelligence is required for the laws of nature to exist. That’s an indefensible position.

Again in nature electrical charges are the bonds between molecules, DNA is completely different. Why cant you show the codes that nature creates?

You seem to believe that whatever you say is real, its not

 

[BreezeWood]

.
non sequitur - your line does not even make sense - "probability is equal or null" - the magical table is made for just such an undertaking.

View attachment 272038

the same for the artists painting - or as you stated, tangentially w-10.

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

Try hard, Vaseline helps

.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

you definitely are missing something - water did not produce the code,

* the code was written by the periodic table ... keyboard.


how about blurry vision, are you having trouble focusing it would seem so by your lack of comprehension.

Water is on the periodic table as H and O.

Next moronic assertion

You are putting the same weight on molecular bonds that atoms form as you are on complicated code that directs the building of pumps that push fluids against the force of gravity and create Carbon semiconductors that create chemical reactions to power the electrical brain.

The above comment could continue for billions of lines of which none happen randomely

.

Water is on the periodic table as H and O.

you are being obtuse -

water is not on the periodic table the same as dna they both are products it has produced. fact.

Question of the Week: Oldest Computer Program

It’s widely accepted that the first computer program was written by Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, in 1842, although a device for which it was intended wasn’t built in her lifetime.

your w-10 argument although not applicable to dna origin none the less refutes your argument by the fact its development began a century earlier in the most rudimentary terms as the same for the beginning of dna. over time - not as you imply at a single instance.

 

[Frannie]

The probability is equal, the possibility of either being null...………..

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

.

Simpletons who believe that the Worlds most complicated and powerful code wrote itself in a pond will disagree

I'm not sure that line makes any sense either ... * there may be something missing in your code, have you been seeing double lately.


when the pond became a cell and after the first bit of information was made the possibilities became exponential in whatever direction for development was chosen by the new organism. the metaphysical physiology.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

Try hard, Vaseline helps

.

Can you point to another instance of water or any unintelligent object producing code...……………….

you definitely are missing something - water did not produce the code,

* the code was written by the periodic table ... keyboard.


how about blurry vision, are you having trouble focusing it would seem so by your lack of comprehension.

Water is on the periodic table as H and O.

Next moronic assertion

You are putting the same weight on molecular bonds that atoms form as you are on complicated code that directs the building of pumps that push fluids against the force of gravity and create Carbon semiconductors that create chemical reactions to power the electrical brain.

The above comment could continue for billions of lines of which none happen randomely

.

Water is on the periodic table as H and O.

you are being obtuse -

water is not on the periodic table the same as dna they both are products it has produced. fact.

Question of the Week: Oldest Computer Program

It’s widely accepted that the first computer program was written by Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, in 1842, although a device for which it was intended wasn’t built in her lifetime.

your w-10 argument although not applicable to dna origin none the less refutes your argument by the fact its development began a century earlier in the most rudimentary terms as the same for the beginning of dna. over time - not as you imply at a single instance.

The first computer program was written many billions of years ago. How many billions is unknown