Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does anyone know of the total dollar amount taxpayers has lost, and will never see a single dime of a return investment, as a result of Obama's russian roulette choices for Green Energy corporations?
Does anyone know of the total dollar amount taxpayers has lost, and will never see a single dime of a return investment, as a result of Obama's russian roulette choices for Green Energy corporations?
I could only share that with you IF you tell the dollar amount taxpayers lost, and will never see a single dime of return investment, as a result of Bush's failed choice of war in Iraq.
However, I am willing to bet that the loss in much greater from failed Iraq than failed green energy companies. Wanna bet?
If you owned a business, say about 200 employees, with a lot of capital and stock and all that economic shit..........but you became ill, and needed someone to run the thing to keep it going so your kids and grandkids would benefit in the future from it, who would you hire to run that company: Barack Obama or Mitt Romney???
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.
Obama.
1. I'm looking out for the long term. I don't want Romney to fire everyone and sell the company off to some major national competitor like Staples. What will my lkids do? I want to keep the family business for generations. Not sell it off. What about the 200 well paid employees and their pensions? Romney would fuck them. Obama would not.
2. Obama is thoughtful and educated. Romney is smart but a bit of a doofis. I think he's got old money and he's not as sharp as you think. More of a delegator like Palin or Perry. He got hooked up with those scumbags at Bain Capital. He's just like Bush. A bit dumb.
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Does anyone know of the total dollar amount taxpayers has lost, and will never see a single dime of a return investment, as a result of Obama's russian roulette choices for Green Energy corporations?
I could only share that with you IF you tell the dollar amount taxpayers lost, and will never see a single dime of return investment, as a result of Bush's failed choice of war in Iraq.
However, I am willing to bet that the loss in much greater from failed Iraq than failed green energy companies. Wanna bet?
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Romney. Obama has never run a business in his life. He knows only working for government and/or pushing an agenda. That is what he did as a community organizer and that is what he's doing now.
He'd run a company into the ground in no time because he has no sense when it comes to spending money wisely. He can't even pick a good company to invest in. Look at Solyndra and Obama rushed that loan through. I still wonder where the money went and suspect that it changed hands and ended up in some Democrat campaigns.
Just navigated us out of the second Great Depression and got Bin Ladin.Saved GM, remember?
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Who would that be?
If you were a business person, you'd consider that profit is the bottom line. Nice try but I know a Democrat plant when I see one.Quote: Originally Posted by snjmom
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Who would that be?
If you were a business person, you'd consider that profit is the bottom line. Nice try but I know a Democrat plant when I see one.Quote: Originally Posted by snjmom
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
As a business person, I want to keep my expenses down, but I want to grow and continue to add new services. I must make a profit on my expenses, but I cannot cut expenses to the point that I can't provide the services that create my revenue. As an example, if I own a bank and a percentage of my potential customers believe I should only offer deposit services and car loans and this is the only purpose of banking, should I restrict the services I offer or should I offer additional services to capture a greater share of the banking services market thus increasing my revenue? Or should I reduce the fees for the wealthiest clients that use the majority of my expensive services while raising fees for the clients that use the least costly services?
If you believe that government should be run as a business then you can't possibly subscribe to the notion of smaller government. Grow or die.
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Who would that be?
If you were a business person, you'd consider that profit is the bottom line. Nice try but I know a Democrat plant when I see one.Quote: Originally Posted by snjmom
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
As a business person, I want to keep my expenses down, but I want to grow and continue to add new services. I must make a profit on my expenses, but I cannot cut expenses to the point that I can't provide the services that create my revenue. As an example, if I own a bank and a percentage of my potential customers believe I should only offer deposit services and car loans and this is the only purpose of banking, should I restrict the services I offer or should I offer additional services to capture a greater share of the banking services market thus increasing my revenue? Or should I reduce the fees for the wealthiest clients that use the majority of my expensive services while raising fees for the clients that use the least costly services?
If you believe that government should be run as a business then you can't possibly subscribe to the notion of smaller government. Grow or die.
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
Who would that be?
If you were a business person, you'd consider that profit is the bottom line. Nice try but I know a Democrat plant when I see one.Quote: Originally Posted by snjmom
As a business person, while I may like the sound of the guy that wants to cut expenses, I'd have to go with the guy that wants to increase revenues.
As a business person, I want to keep my expenses down, but I want to grow and continue to add new services. I must make a profit on my expenses, but I cannot cut expenses to the point that I can't provide the services that create my revenue. As an example, if I own a bank and a percentage of my potential customers believe I should only offer deposit services and car loans and this is the only purpose of banking, should I restrict the services I offer or should I offer additional services to capture a greater share of the banking services market thus increasing my revenue? Or should I reduce the fees for the wealthiest clients that use the majority of my expensive services while raising fees for the clients that use the least costly services?
If you believe that government should be run as a business then you can't possibly subscribe to the notion of smaller government. Grow or die.
Those who are interested can listen to persons who used to work for Romney here:
How Mitt Romney's Firm Tried
We all know you won't listen but you'll swear you've looked at all the facts.
Actually there is a lot to like about Bain if you're yoked like you say you are. But it would require effort and there is a possibility you're firmly held beliefs will be challenged so make sure you don't listen.
Besides, it's NPR so I'm sure you have no reason to listen.
NPR is just as neutral as Rush Limbaugh, why would anyone give either of those sources a hard time?
If you owned a business, say about 200 employees, with a lot of capital and stock and all that economic shit..........but you became ill, and needed someone to run the thing to keep it going so your kids and grandkids would benefit in the future from it, who would you hire to run that company: Barack Obama or Mitt Romney???
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.
Barack Obama. Without a question. It would be a company I could be proud of. The bottom line isn't the only thing to consider for most Americans. You're right, it was a simple question and it had an obvious answer.
"Corporations are people my friend"--Willard Romney.
yea like if Obama ran a Company he would not consider the "bottom line"....give me a break......
Increased revenue does not increase profit. So as a business owner, you take 150 jobs that you know will lose money, you have increased your revenue but eventually you have to pay the bills.
Those who are interested can listen to persons who used to work for Romney here:
How Mitt Romney's Firm Tried
We all know you won't listen but you'll swear you've looked at all the facts.
Actually there is a lot to like about Bain if you're yoked like you say you are. But it would require effort and there is a possibility you're firmly held beliefs will be challenged so make sure you don't listen.
Besides, it's NPR so I'm sure you have no reason to listen.
You amuse me, Candy. Did you actually read the NPR article? If you HAD you'd note that Romney wasn't even running Bain at the time discussed. So you want to hold up as an example of what a "bad businessman" Romney is...something that was done when he had taken a leave of absence to run for office? This is the kind of nonsense I expect from Deanie or TM. Seriously...you need to step back and think before you post drivel like this.
Increased revenue does not increase profit. So as a business owner, you take 150 jobs that you know will lose money, you have increased your revenue but eventually you have to pay the bills.
Increased revenue doesn't increase profit?
Increased revenue does not increase profit. So as a business owner, you take 150 jobs that you know will lose money, you have increased your revenue but eventually you have to pay the bills.
Increased revenue doesn't increase profit?
Increased revenue does not increase profit. So as a business owner, you take 150 jobs that you know will lose money, you have increased your revenue but eventually you have to pay the bills.
Increased revenue doesn't increase profit?
