If You Want Change, Win An Election

[candycorn]

The hilarious thing is that for all the bitter hatred and anger from the right we've seen this week (directed at their own party), 90+% of them will be re-elected due to the gerrymandering.

Whats with you people? You really believe the shit they spill you. Now I've just been having the most fabulous day hunting down Norwegian graveyards and found an awesome one.

But your fuck ups trying to desperately trying to nuke conservatives is just hysterical.

Stop trying.

Wanna bet that McConnell will keep his Senate Seat. If he wins, you leave the board. If he loses, I leave the board.

Your move.

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Whats with you people? You really believe the shit they spill you. Now I've just been having the most fabulous day hunting down Norwegian graveyards and found an awesome one.

But your fuck ups trying to desperately trying to nuke conservatives is just hysterical.

Stop trying.

Wanna bet that McConnell will keep his Senate Seat. If he wins, you leave the board. If he loses, I leave the board.

Your move.

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

 

[candycorn]

Wanna bet that McConnell will keep his Senate Seat. If he wins, you leave the board. If he loses, I leave the board.

Your move.

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

 

[EriktheRed]

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

Not from here you don't. I still see Sandy Fluke (not that I mind).

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

That POS Sandra Flooook.

 

[Oldstyle]

It's that skanky chick that wants free birth control pills before she jets off for another vacation...you know the one...

 

[Oldstyle]

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

Not from here you don't. I still see Sandy Fluke (not that I mind).

Ewww...really? Come on, Dude...time to have some standards!

 

[candycorn]

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

Not from here you don't. I still see Sandy Fluke (not that I mind).

Nah, I mean I don't see avatars or signature lines.

 

[candycorn]

It would be nice to see you gone. Every time I see your avatar I want to lose my lunch.

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

That POS Sandra Flooook.

Who?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I actually have avatars turned off...what is my avatar?

That POS Sandra Flooook.

Who?

Oh please.

 

[candycorn]

That POS Sandra Flooook.

Who?

Oh please.

All too easy...

 

[rightwinger]

I think you forgot to wear your oxygen mask a few too many times when working in those sewer systems.

.Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

figures you would use Wikipedia as you source, LAME!

If you question their sources, you are welcome to challenge

I'll wait

 

[rightwinger]

I think you forgot to wear your oxygen mask a few too many times when working in those sewer systems.

.Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Another presidential poll was conducted by The Wall Street Journal in 2005, with James Lindgren of Northwestern University Law School for the Federalist Society.[12] As in the 2000 survey, the editors sought to balance the opinions of liberals and conservatives, adjusting the results "to give Democratic- and Republican-leaning scholars equal weight." Franklin D. Roosevelt still ranked in the top-three, but editor James Taranto noted that Democratic-leaning scholars rated George W. Bush the sixth-worst president of all time, while Republican scholars rated him the sixth-best, giving him a split-decision rating of "average"."

If it was "universal", Winger...then why did Bush rank sixth best amongst Republican scholars and sixth worst amongst Democratic leaning scholars? As usual your claims are full of Grade A cow manure.

But hey, at least you didn't look as stupid with this claim as you have with your previous ones!

2005?

When did the economic collapse begin? Two years later

Nice spin there

 

[candycorn]

Whats with you people? You really believe the shit they spill you. Now I've just been having the most fabulous day hunting down Norwegian graveyards and found an awesome one.

But your fuck ups trying to desperately trying to nuke conservatives is just hysterical.

Stop trying.

Wanna bet that McConnell will keep his Senate Seat. If he wins, you leave the board. If he loses, I leave the board.

Your move.

Chirp Chirp Chirp? Do we have a deal?

I noticed [MENTION=25451]tinydancer[/MENTION] has abandoned the thread...hmmm

 

[Oldstyle]

.Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Another presidential poll was conducted by The Wall Street Journal in 2005, with James Lindgren of Northwestern University Law School for the Federalist Society.[12] As in the 2000 survey, the editors sought to balance the opinions of liberals and conservatives, adjusting the results "to give Democratic- and Republican-leaning scholars equal weight." Franklin D. Roosevelt still ranked in the top-three, but editor James Taranto noted that Democratic-leaning scholars rated George W. Bush the sixth-worst president of all time, while Republican scholars rated him the sixth-best, giving him a split-decision rating of "average"."

If it was "universal", Winger...then why did Bush rank sixth best amongst Republican scholars and sixth worst amongst Democratic leaning scholars? As usual your claims are full of Grade A cow manure.

But hey, at least you didn't look as stupid with this claim as you have with your previous ones!

2005?

When did the economic collapse begin? Two years later

Nice spin there

So it's your contention that Republican scholars blamed W. for the economic collapse and dropped him all the way from the sixth best to the worst? Really, Winger? That's as absurd a claim as your claim that Bush is "universally" seen as a bad President by historians. Here's a clue for you, Sparky...historians universally agree on very few things.

 

[Contumacious]

2005? When did the economic collapse begin? Two years later

The Crisis in 10 Points

The 2007–2008 financial crisis had its genesis in the United States housing markets, but it rapidly spread to other economies, first to the United Kingdom, but then almost everywhere else, including such unlikely spots as Iceland whose banking system collapsed."

.

 

[nodoginnafight]

So it's your contention that Republican scholars

Oxymoron

 

[Oldstyle]

So it's your contention that Republican scholars

Oxymoron

Oh...PLEASE! This continuing nonsense from liberals that conservatives are all illiterate hillbillies with 8th grade educations is about as moronic as the average Deanie or Sallow post! I hate to break this to you, "Dog" but there are many conservative scholars. Are there as many conservatives as there are liberals? No, I'd say there aren't but since academia has become a "refuge" for those who prefer to deal with theory rather than reality...is that really remarkable? Larry Summers and Christina Romer tucked tail and ran back to their tenured professorships at Harvard and Berkeley when their economic policies failed miserably in the real world. If THAT is any example of the superiority of liberal thinking then you're not doing so well...are you?

 

[Rinata]

[Oduma is the worst President in our proud nations history, he and his fellow democratic congressman have run up a tab that my grandchildren will be paying. EVEN WORSE THAN GW!!!! Heres the proof!!

ATTACH]28019[/ATTACH]
Chart 4.12: Government Debt as Percent of GDP

April 5, 2008

History News Network’s poll of 109 historians found that 61 percent of them rank Bush as “worst ever” among U.S. presidents. Bush’s key competition comes from Buchanan, apparently, and a further 2 percent of the sample puts Bush right behind Buchanan as runner-up for “worst ever.” 96 percent of the respondents place the Bush presidency in the bottom tier of American presidencies. And was his presidency (it’s a bit wishful to speak of his presidency in the past tense–after all there are several more months left to go) a success or failure? On that score the numbers are still more resounding: 98 percent label it a “failure.”

Here are some of the comments that the historians furnished:

“It would be difficult to identify a President who, facing major international and domestic crises, has failed in both as clearly as President Bush,” concluded one respondent. “His domestic policies,” another noted, “have had the cumulative effect of shoring up a semi-permanent aristocracy of capital that dwarfs the aristocracy of land against which the founding fathers rebelled; of encouraging a mindless retreat from science and rationalism; and of crippling the nation’s economic base.”

“No individual president can compare to the second Bush,” wrote one. “Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich, trampled on the Bill of Rights, appointed foxes in every henhouse, compounded the terrorist threat, turned a blind eye to torture and corruption and a looming ecological disaster, and squandered the rest of the world’s goodwill. In short, no other president’s faults have had so deleterious an effect on not only the country but the world at large.”

“With his unprovoked and disastrous war of aggression in Iraq and his monstrous deficits, Bush has set this country on a course that will take decades to correct,” said another historian. “When future historians look back to identify the moment at which the United States began to lose its position of world leadership, they will point—rightly—to the Bush presidency. Thanks to his policies, it is now easy to see America losing out to its competitors in any number of areas: China is rapidly becoming the manufacturing powerhouse of the next century, India the high tech and services leader, and Europe the region with the best quality of life.”

Worst. President. Ever. | Harper's Magazine
isn
I sincerely doubt that Barack Obama will ever be considered to be in the same class as George W. Bush. Dream about it because it will never happen.

Gee, liberal historians hate W...what a shocker!!! Here's a hint for you, Rinata...how historians view Presidents evolves over time. At the end of Bush's second term he was seen as a terrible President by quite a few people, many of which declared here that he was the worst of all time. I made the statement then...and I'll repeat it now...that Bush in many ways will be judged by the success or failure of the President who comes after him. If Barack Obama is successful then Bush will be viewed as a goat...If Obama falls on his face then Bush will be viewed in a much more favorable light.

As of right now, Barack Obama is the best thing that could have EVER happened to George W. Bush and quite frankly I don't see Obama making any changes in his last three years to alter that perception. Obama makes Bush look good because Obama isn't a good President.

Oh, please. Nice try.

 

[Oldstyle]

Did you want to critique some specific part of my contention...or does "nice try" suffice as argument for you?