IG Report Thread

[Marion Morrison]

The house just passed a resolution to hold the DOJ and Rosenstine in contempt... This is about to get real interesting..

You know that didn't actually happen, right?

Sometimes it's hard to say whether you're delsuional, or just a liar.

Then tell me what the Wilson-Johnson resolution meant? The implication was very clear, obstruction of congress... The next step is impeachment.

You'll understand that I'm not going to just take your word for it - you don't exactly have the best track record here.

Don't forget, a month ago you claimed to have already seen the IG report, and that it would recommend charges against Rosenstein, Comey, and Brennan, as well as confirm all the bullshit conspiracy theories you've been pushing for the last year.

I've spent the better part of a day reading and rereading the report and his recommendations are stunning.

The OIG lays out perjury by 4 FBI administrative staff, 5 DOJ administrative Staff and alleges intentional misleading of the FISA court and perjury to obtain a warrant on Carter Page by deception. This included 4 attempts to continue the warrant which were granted and each knowing of the omissions and deceptions. The OIG states that all were aware of the deceptions and chose to lie to the court for political gain. Rosenstine is among those who are alleged to have lied to the FISA court. (McCabe, Comey, Brennan). Charges range from manufacturing false evidence, falsifying official reports, divulging classified information, and destruction of evidence, are but a few of the very concerning allegations.

If everything is true in the IG report, the whole Mueller witch hunt is illegitimate and baseless. The ongoing attempts to remove Trump are nothing short of an organized coup and treason against the US. Some 35 individuals are named for referral to felony criminal proceedings.

Former F.B.I. Deputy Director Is Faulted in Scathing Inspector General Report

https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

Did you think I had forgotten?

This was included in that post..what is it?

https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

That's the section of the report that was released a month or so ago, detailing Andrew McCabe's supposed leaking.

Did you read it?

Yessir! By "read", I mean "skim". It appears pretty damning to him.

 

[The Original Tree]

Hillary Clinton sold Hypersonic Technology to Vladimir Putin

 

[Care4all]

'Foreign actors' accessed Clinton’s emails, including at least one classified 'secret,' committee finds
“Foreign actors” obtained access to some of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails -- including at least one email classified as “secret” -- according to a new memo from two GOP-led House committees and an internal FBI email.

Fox News obtained the memo prepared by the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, which lays out key interim findings ahead of next week’s hearing with Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. The IG, separately, is expected to release his highly anticipated report on the Clinton email case later Thursday.

The House committees, which conducted a joint probe into decisions made by the DOJ in 2016 and 2017, addressed a range of issues in their memo including Clinton's email security.

“Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails -- including at least one email classified 'Secret,'" the memo says, adding that foreign actors also accessed the private accounts of some Clinton staffers

What documents show this.....? The twoo congress critters saying such, should show us the documents they claim show this....

Does today's IG report say anything on this which supports the critters contentions?

 

[WillowTree]

Comey cannot be found! Was insubordinate! Broke protocol.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Offer ‘em what’s behind Door #2.

Snouter , hell dude throw in Carol Merrill and Jay...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, the report's out:

2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

 

[DJT for Life]

Well...Mueller better have some collusion evidence,
because Obstruction of Justice has just flown out the window.

Unless Mueller goes after Trump for not prosecuting Comey

 

[WillowTree]

Well, the report's out:

2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

I think your mind is made up and your bias against conservatives is evident. Typical libtard!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, the report's out:

2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

I think your mind is made up and your bias against conservatives is evident. Typical libtard!

Feel free to demonstrate that I'm wrong.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

You wait for the Sen.Corker TPM for the day...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

You wait for the Sen.Corker TPM for the day...

What is "the Sen.Corker TPM"?

I'm reading the actual report. I suggest you try that.

 

[nat4900]

I sense trebidation on your part.

Besides your 2nd grade grammar......WHO ever stated that you had ANY sense??..........lol

 

[kwc57]

Well, the report's out:

2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

No need, Maddow and Colbert will tell you its nothing and you'll swallow it.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, the report's out:

2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government

Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?

No need, Maddow and Colbert will tell you its nothing and you'll swallow it.

I'm reading the report right now. It's in plain english, it's not that challenging.

I suggest you try it.

 

[Ridgerunner]

I'm reading the actual report. I suggest you try that.

Doc, when you finish your read take two aspirin and take the rest of the day off...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Thread title changed to limit duplicate threads.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I'm reading the actual report. I suggest you try that.

Doc, when you finish your read take two aspirin and take the rest of the day off...

Do you have anything of relevance to say about the report?

 

[Billy_Bob]

In undertaking our analysis, our task was made significantly more difficult because of text and instant messages exchanged on FBI devices and systems by five FBI employees involved in the Mid year investigation. These messages reflected political opinions in support of former Secretary Clinton and against her then political opponent, Donald Trump.Some of these text messages and instant messages mixed political commentary with discussions about the Mid year investigation, and raised concerns that political bias may have impacted investigative decisions.In particular, we were concerned about text messages exchanged by FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. As we describe in Chapter Twelve of our report, most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, the suggestion in certain Russia-related text messages in August 2016 that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact presidential candidate Trump’s electoral prospects caused us to question the earlier Midyear investigative decisions in which Strzok was involved, and whether he took specificactions in the Midyear investigation based on his political views. As we describe Chapter Five of our report, we found that Strzok was not the sole decision maker for any of the specific Midyear investigative decisions we examined in that chapter.We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation."

Political Bias drove not only the Hillary exoneration but the Trump aggressiveness in investigation.... Damn....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

In undertaking our analysis, our task was made significantly more difficult because of text and instant messages exchanged on FBI devices and systems by five FBI employees involved in the Mid year investigation. These messages reflected political opinions in support of former Secretary Clinton and against her then political opponent, Donald Trump.Some of these text messages and instant messages mixed political commentary with discussions about the Mid year investigation, and raised concerns that political bias may have impacted investigative decisions.In particular, we were concerned about text messages exchanged by FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. As we describe in Chapter Twelve of our report, most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, the suggestion in certain Russia-related text messages in August 2016 that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact presidential candidate Trump’s electoral prospects caused us to question the earlier Midyear investigative decisions in which Strzok was involved, and whether he took specificactions in the Midyear investigation based on his political views. As we describe Chapter Five of our report, we found that Strzok was not the sole decision maker for any of the specific Midyear investigative decisions we examined in that chapter.We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation."

Political Bias drove not only the Hillary exoneration but the Trump aggressiveness in investigation.... Damn....

Nice try.

The report states the opposite of the conclusion you've drawn - in plain English.

So when are you going to admit that you're a liar?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

In undertaking our analysis, our task was made significantly more difficult because of text and instant messages exchanged on FBI devices and systems by five FBI employees involved in the Mid year investigation. These messages reflected political opinions in support of former Secretary Clinton and against her then political opponent, Donald Trump.Some of these text messages and instant messages mixed political commentary with discussions about the Mid year investigation, and raised concerns that political bias may have impacted investigative decisions.In particular, we were concerned about text messages exchanged by FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. As we describe in Chapter Twelve of our report, most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, the suggestion in certain Russia-related text messages in August 2016 that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact presidential candidate Trump’s electoral prospects caused us to question the earlier Midyear investigative decisions in which Strzok was involved, and whether he took specificactions in the Midyear investigation based on his political views. As we describe Chapter Five of our report, we found that Strzok was not the sole decision maker for any of the specific Midyear investigative decisions we examined in that chapter.We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation."

Political Bias drove not only the Hillary exoneration but the Trump aggressiveness in investigation.... Damn....

We analyzed the Department’s declination decision according to the same analytical standard that we applied to other decisions made during the investigation. We did not substitute the OIG’s judgment for the judgments made by the Department, but rather sought to determine whether the decision was based on improper considerations, including political bias. We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice.