Illegal immigrants: I deserve free health, give it to me NOW

[Monk-Eye]

" Implement Jus Sanguinin Subject To Clause And Secure Voting Only For Citizens "

* Right Meets The Left On Ignoring Immigration Policy Managed Laws Established By Citizens *

No. There is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegals or illegal underclass. We should be generating revenue from foreign nationals in the US.

The libertarian anarchist resigns that it is within its realm of allowable proclivities to import foreign labor and deport it at will for private free enterprise without interference by government .

Fools on the left ascribe those to be selfish reasons and resign that selfish reasons of its religion of secular humanism are legitimate to save others from themselves .

 

[danielpalos]

" Implement Jus Sanguinin Subject To Clause And Secure Voting Only For Citizens "

* Right Meets The Left On Ignoring Immigration Policy Managed Laws Established By Citizens *

No. There is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegals or illegal underclass. We should be generating revenue from foreign nationals in the US.

The libertarian anarchist resigns that it is within its realm of allowable proclivities to import foreign labor and deport it at will for private free enterprise without interference by government .

Fools on the left ascribe those to be selfish reasons and resign that selfish reasons of its religion of secular humanism are legitimate to save others from themselves .

This is the Law, right wingers:

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Obey the law. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass in our Republic.

Why does the Right Wing prefer to waste money on extra-Constitutional laws, and then refuse to pay for it by insisting on Tax Cut economics?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Support Supply And Demand For Income In Commodities Markets "

* Efficiency Of Conditional Improvements Through Technical Skills *

--https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/

A cost of living is based upon wages and purchasing power .

An issue with fiat currency is that the money supply is critical in controlling the value of currency .

Why would an increase in wages be necessary , if the value of currency and wages remained consistent with purchasing power ?

A focus should be whether the number of individuals in need of wages are also available for employment and also match the demands of the market .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Management Controls For Practical Application Of Advantages In Capitalism Systems "

* Political Science Pedagogy Absent *

This is the Law, right wingers:
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,"
Obey the law. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass in our Republic.

Your response is ridiculous .

My suggestion for you to conceptualize being a survivor in a lifeboat escaping from a sinking ship and deciding whether to allow more individuals onto the boat at capacity or to send them away to find another life boat .

* Feasible Side Of Which Coin *

Why does the Right Wing prefer to waste money on extra-Constitutional laws, and then refuse to pay for it by insisting on Tax Cut economics?

The left promotes social welfare programs with concepts that it will facilitate demand by the new supply of moneys it has provided that will ultimately pay for the deficits it created to pay for the policies .

The right promotes tax cuts with concepts that it will facilitate demand by the new supply of moneys it has provided that will ultimately pay for the deficits it created to pay for the policies .


* Global Competition And Free Enterprise *

American School (economics) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The American School, also known as the National System, represents three different yet related constructs in politics, policy and philosophy. It was the American policy from the 1790s to the 1970s, waxing and waning in actual degrees and details of implementation.

It is the macroeconomic philosophy that dominated United States national policies from the time of the American Civil War until the mid-20th century.[2][3][4][5][6][7] Closely related to mercantilism, it can be seen as contrary to classical economics. It consisted of these three core policies:

1. Protecting industry through selective high tariffs (especially 1861–1932) and through subsidies (especially 1932–1970).
2. Government investments in infrastructure creating targeted internal improvements (especially in transportation).
3. A national bank with policies that promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation.[8][9][10][11]

The American School's key elements were promoted by John Quincy Adams and his National Republican Party, Henry Clay and the Whig Party and Abraham Lincoln through the early Republican Party which embraced, implemented and maintained this economic system.[12]

During its American System period, the United States grew into the largest economy in the world with the highest standard of living, surpassing the British Empire by the 1880s.[13]


* Leveraging An Ethical Dilemma Of Optional Endeavor *

There is sometimes a whitehouse comment line and , when nasa was issuing moneys to several private companies to develop space transport , the line for obama was asked , " How are special endowments to private companies any less or more ethical than equal endowments of egalitarian distributions ? " and , garnered by eisegeis as a paraphrased from a response on television at a podium , it was related that the companies possessed advantages that made them deserving of the endowments .

There is a third tier of citizen compensation , a sort of profit sharing for the collective , that is based the dichotomy of ethical validity between special or selective endowment versus equal or egalitarian endowment - Public Private Trust .

 

[danielpalos]

" Support Supply And Demand For Income In Commodities Markets "

* Efficiency Of Conditional Improvements Through Technical Skills *

--https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/

A cost of living is based upon wages and purchasing power .

An issue with fiat currency is that the money supply is critical in controlling the value of currency .

Why would an increase in wages be necessary , if the value of currency and wages remained consistent with purchasing power ?

A focus should be whether the number of individuals in need of wages are also available for employment and also match the demands of the market .

lol. Because it did not stay consistent with purchasing power. Inflation happens, regardless.

 

[danielpalos]

" Management Controls For Practical Application Of Advantages In Capitalism Systems "

* Political Science Pedagogy Absent *

This is the Law, right wingers:
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,"
Obey the law. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass in our Republic.

Your response is ridiculous .

My suggestion for you to conceptualize being a survivor in a lifeboat escaping from a sinking ship and deciding whether to allow more individuals onto the boat at capacity or to send them away to find another life boat .

* Feasible Side Of Which Coin *

Why does the Right Wing prefer to waste money on extra-Constitutional laws, and then refuse to pay for it by insisting on Tax Cut economics?

The left promotes social welfare programs with concepts that it will facilitate demand by the new supply of moneys it has provided that will ultimately pay for the deficits it created to pay for the policies .

The right promotes tax cuts with concepts that it will facilitate demand by the new supply of moneys it has provided that will ultimately pay for the deficits it created to pay for the policies .


* Global Competition And Free Enterprise *

American School (economics) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The American School, also known as the National System, represents three different yet related constructs in politics, policy and philosophy. It was the American policy from the 1790s to the 1970s, waxing and waning in actual degrees and details of implementation.

It is the macroeconomic philosophy that dominated United States national policies from the time of the American Civil War until the mid-20th century.[2][3][4][5][6][7] Closely related to mercantilism, it can be seen as contrary to classical economics. It consisted of these three core policies:

1. Protecting industry through selective high tariffs (especially 1861–1932) and through subsidies (especially 1932–1970).
2. Government investments in infrastructure creating targeted internal improvements (especially in transportation).
3. A national bank with policies that promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation.[8][9][10][11]

The American School's key elements were promoted by John Quincy Adams and his National Republican Party, Henry Clay and the Whig Party and Abraham Lincoln through the early Republican Party which embraced, implemented and maintained this economic system.[12]

During its American System period, the United States grew into the largest economy in the world with the highest standard of living, surpassing the British Empire by the 1880s.[13]


* Leveraging An Ethical Dilemma Of Optional Endeavor *

There is sometimes a whitehouse comment line and , when nasa was issuing moneys to several private companies to develop space transport , the line for obama was asked , " How are special endowments to private companies any less or more ethical than equal endowments of egalitarian distributions ? " and , garnered by eisegeis as a paraphrased from a response on television at a podium , it was related that the companies possessed advantages that made them deserving of the endowments .

There is a third tier of citizen compensation , a sort of profit sharing for the collective , that is based the dichotomy of ethical validity between special or selective endowment versus equal or egalitarian endowment - Public Private Trust .

You are ridiculous. Obey the laws, right wingers. Don't practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) when it involves the less fortunate.

The Law is already majestic enough on its own.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Flatulence Of Flames "

* Delusions Of Grandeur And Voices *

You are ridiculous. Obey the laws, right wingers. Don't practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) when it involves the less fortunate.
The Law is already majestic enough on its own.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France

Oh dear , a schizophrenic .

How about picking a law to affirm your position rather than uttering something as completely idiotic as " obey the laws " ?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Consolidation Of Disparate Free Enterprise Industries "

* Proletariat Coveting Aristocracy Constraining Free Flow Of Currency *

;ol. Because it did not stay consistent with purchasing power. Inflation happens, regardless.

The second paragraph of your own reference supports only that your statement is false .

For most U.S. workers, real wages have barely budged in decades

Adjusted for inflation, today's average hourly wage has about as much purchasing power as it did in 1978. Most wage increases have gone to the highest earners.

www.pewresearch.org

But despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today’s real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago. And what wage gains there have been have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers.

 

[danielpalos]

" Flatulence Of Flames "

* Delusions Of Grandeur And Voices *

You are ridiculous. Obey the laws, right wingers. Don't practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) when it involves the less fortunate.
The Law is already majestic enough on its own.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France

Oh dear , a schizophrenic .

How about picking a law to affirm your position rather than uttering something as completely idiotic as " obey the laws " ?

too bad for you, i believe in equality.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[danielpalos]

" Consolidation Of Disparate Free Enterprise Industries "

* Proletariat Coveting Aristocracy Constraining Free Flow Of Currency *

;ol. Because it did not stay consistent with purchasing power. Inflation happens, regardless.

The second paragraph of your own reference supports only that your statement is false .

For most U.S. workers, real wages have barely budged in decades

Adjusted for inflation, today's average hourly wage has about as much purchasing power as it did in 1978. Most wage increases have gone to the highest earners.

www.pewresearch.org

But despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today’s real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago. And what wage gains there have been have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers.

lol. Only if you don't understand simple English.

But despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today’s real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago. And what wage gains there have been have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers.

Paychecks Lag as Profits Soar, and Prices Erode Wage Gains--https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/business/economy/wages-workers-profits.html

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Preying On Aristocratic Trust Four Focus On Individualism Over Collectivism "

* Tough Titty Technocracy Does Knot Beckon Yearn Over Drawn Kneed Four Lowest Servile Inn Futures Scope *

lol. Only if you don't understand simple English.
But despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today’s real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago. And what wage gains there have been have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers.
Paychecks Lag as Profits Soar, and Prices Erode Wage Gains--https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/business/economy/wages-workers-profits.html

The issue for the left and not necessarily for the right is how to improve the skill set of its citizenry to be competitive where wages are improving .

As the right is fed its gluttony of candidates for a competitive servile class , even as its ventures outsource technical skill sets to countries who track native talent for training to satisfy critical consulting roles and compete for market share , the left is more concerned with importing a servile class - first come , first served , non merit based immigration policy - to numerically acquire a bureaucratic collective and commandeer the affluence and wealth of those exceeding in privilege and able to further improve commodities and economic markets for a greater number .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Article Four Dispatched Red Herring Blocker "

* Protection Versus Endowment Not Equal Between Citizens Versus Non Citizens *

too bad for you, i believe in equality.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Made in God’s image. Yuk. Not me thanks.
Those promoting equality often confuse equal protection from government with equal endowment through government , as the two are not the same .

 

[danielpalos]

" Preying On Aristocratic Trust Four Focus On Individualism Over Collectivism "

* Tough Titty Technocracy Does Knot Beckon Yearn Over Drawn Kneed Four Lowest Servile Inn Futures Scope *

lol. Only if you don't understand simple English.
But despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today’s real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago. And what wage gains there have been have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers.
Paychecks Lag as Profits Soar, and Prices Erode Wage Gains--https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/business/economy/wages-workers-profits.html

The issue for the left and not necessarily for the right is how to improve the skill set of its citizenry to be competitive where wages are improving .

As the right is fed its gluttony of candidates for a competitive servile class , even as its ventures outsource technical skill sets to countries who track native talent for training to satisfy critical consulting roles and compete for market share , the left is more concerned with importing a servile class - first come , first served , non merit based immigration policy - to numerically acquire a bureaucratic collective and commandeer the affluence and wealth of those exceeding in privilege and able to further improve commodities and economic markets for a greater number .

That is why it is important to understand the language our supreme Law of the land is written in.

We have a Commerce clause; why does the right wing not know how make money only lose money yet allege to be for Capitalism?

 

[danielpalos]

" Article Four Dispatched Red Herring Blocker "

* Protection Versus Endowment Not Equal Between Citizens Versus Non Citizens *

too bad for you, i believe in equality.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Made in God’s image. Yuk. Not me thanks.
Those promoting equality often confuse equal protection from government with equal endowment through government , as the two are not the same .

You misunderstand the Purpose of our form of Government.

This is what Congress is supposed to be doing:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Breed Into Poverty And Relocate To Manifest The Same "

* Off Base Exemplification Of Ignorance *

You misunderstand the Purpose of our form of Government.
This is what Congress is supposed to be doing:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

A state is comprised of and acts on behalf of its citizens .

The statutes you are raising related with equal protections and endowments to citizens , which have nothing to do with foreign national freddy and freeda free loaders helping themselves to the endowments of us citizenship , indirectly through the illegitimate practice where us provides jus soli rather than jus sanginin to the children of illegal migrants .

 

[danielpalos]

" Breed Into Poverty And Relocate To Manifest The Same "

* Off Base Exemplification Of Ignorance *

You misunderstand the Purpose of our form of Government.
This is what Congress is supposed to be doing:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

A state is comprised of and acts on behalf of its citizens .

The statutes you are raising related with equal protections and endowments to citizens , which have nothing to do with foreign national freddy and freeda free loaders helping themselves to the endowments of us citizenship , indirectly through the illegitimate practice where us provides jus soli rather than jus sanginin to the children of illegal migrants .

This is still our supreme law of the land:
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,
All Laws enacted by Congress to be faithfully faithfully executed by the chief executive must be in close support.

We should have no illegal Problem or illegal underclass.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Planet Is Full Do Not Due Knot Breed Into Poverty Those Legitimately Say Not Mine Two Feed "

* Ethical Outrage About The Integrity Of Citizenship Bound With Tangible Real Dollars And Scents *

This is still our supreme law of the land:
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,
All Laws enacted by Congress to be faithfully faithfully executed by the chief executive must be in close support.
We should have no illegal Problem or illegal underclass.

There is as usual a conflagration of language through a poor application of terminology .

The term " illegal " is analogous with " not legal " , meaning that such sojourners are not legal registrants with us legal immigration system , meaning that the sojourner is not a subject by title of registration in us legal immigration system , meaning that the sojourner is not " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause as in accordance with us fourteenth amendment , which is a more rigorous and stern implication of the " undocumented " euphemism .

Hence , applying jus sanguinin to children of " non jurisdiction " migrants is consistent with fourteenth amendment of us constitution .

A means to transfer medical costs incurred to us private and public sectors for neonatal deliveries , for urgent care , should be billed back to the country from which the " non jurisdiction " migrant originates .

A non jurisdiction , non legal , migrant is not entitled to positive wrights of endowment , however social subsistence is received for the " anchor baby " based upon estimates of income from the " non jurisdiction " parents who are also deflating their net worth by engaging more in a less traceable cash society .

 

[danielpalos]

" Planet Is Full Do Not Due Knot Breed Into Poverty Those Legitimately Say Not Mine Two Feed "

* Ethical Outrage About The Integrity Of Citizenship Bound With Tangible Real Dollars And Scents *

This is still our supreme law of the land:
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,
All Laws enacted by Congress to be faithfully faithfully executed by the chief executive must be in close support.
We should have no illegal Problem or illegal underclass.

There is as usual a conflagration of language through a poor application of terminology .

The term " illegal " is analogous with " not legal " , meaning that such sojourners are not legal registrants with us legal immigration system , meaning that the sojourner is not a subject by title of registration in us legal immigration system , meaning that the sojourner is not " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause as in accordance with us fourteenth amendment , which is a more rigorous and stern implication of the phrase " undocumented " .

Hence , applying jus sanguinin to children of " non jurisdiction " migrants is consistent with fourteenth amendment of us constitution .

A means to transfer medical costs incurred to us private and public sectors for neonatal deliveries , or for urgent care , should be billed back to the country from which the " non jurisdiction " migrant originates .

A non legal migrant is not entitled to positive wrights of endowment , however social subsistence is received for the " anchor baby " based upon estimates of income from the " non jurisdiction " parents who are also deflating their net worthy by engaging more in a less traceable cash society .

Show us this right wing fantasy of any form of clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration.

We should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass with an uniform rule of naturalization. We should be "making money on foreign nationals in the US not losing money." What is wrong, right wingers. Prefer your Expensive socialism on a national basis to Commerce well regulated? Why only soo much right wing support for Capitalism, in Socialism threads?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" US Citizens Set Laws And Policy "

* Red Herring Focus On Legal Immigration System Providence *

Show us this right wing fantasy of any form of clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration.
We should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass with an uniform rule of naturalization. We should be "making money on foreign nationals in the US not losing money." What is wrong, right wingers. Prefer your Expensive socialism on a national basis to Commerce well regulated? Why only soo much right wing support for Capitalism, in Socialism threads?

Are you diverting from " Obey the law . " as it applies to jus sanguinin being applied to award citizenship to children of " non jurisdiction " migrants ?

The conjectures for " making money " are not just pie in the sky dreams and is subject to both debits and credits , both gains and losses , depending upon circumstances .

The us legal immigration system includes a caveat in the visa agreement that an individual is not traveling to the us with the intended purpose of delivering a child to become a us citizen .

Sew , why in hell should citizens expect to set aside that expectation of compliance for " non jurisdiction " migrants , when the process of legal and permanent immigration requires proof of self sufficiency ?

Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants

" Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants " * It Is Time To Require jus sanguinis * A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to a US island that has become popular for birth tourism A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Monk-Eye]

" A Fee To Get A Clue "

* Baffling Expectation From Vacuous Populism *

Why only soo much right wing support for Capitalism, in Socialism threads?

The means and extremes paradigm , or the golden means paradigm , or the golden ratio paradigm , idealistically expects that any two extremes may be modeled and analyzed according to the scheme of antonyms .

Consider a scheme where authoritarianism and libertarianism are logical antonyms , where authoritarianism is consistent with prescriptions of law asserting aggression by a state , which are laws written as positive wrights , and where libertarianism is consistent with proscriptions of law forbidding aggression by a state , which are laws written as negative wrights .

Consider ascribing the concept of individualism ( I ) with the extreme of libertarianism ( L ) which does not expect interference by aggression through governance of a state or from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

Consider ascribing the concept of communalism ( C ) with the extremes of authoritarianism ( A ) , which does expect interference by aggression through governance of a state and from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

Another analogy would relate statism ( S ) with the extremes of authoritarianism ( A ) which does expect interference by aggression through governance of a state and from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

The golden relation applied indicates that the natural aesthetic means of individualism ( *i , *l ) and communalism / statistism ( *c , *s , *a ) exist between the extremes ( L , I ) and ( A , C , S ) .

I__________*i_______*s__________S , I___________*i_______*c__________C

Thus those aspiring communism have optioned authoritarianism towards the natural mean of communalism ( *c ) , whereas those aspiring capitalism have optioned libertarianism towards the natural mean of individualism ( *i ) .

* Where Is Socialism *

There is a difference between communal social systems that are state managed and collective social system that are privately managed , though both are intermingled within the concept of state capitalism .


* Meets Where Linear Area Metes *

Golden ratio - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org