Immigrants: A Net Good

Number Of Homeless Public School Students Hits Record High. Here's Who's Helping

If you want me to agree to immigration and refugees then the American citizens need to be taken care of first.

We have areas with a huge homeless problem. We have an under employment problem. These people need to be taken care of FIRST.

When wages for Americans increase, I can applaud immigration and refugees. American citizens come first.
 
there are THOUSANDS of ways illegals cost the US taxpayer

you wont find them in your studies because the douchebags that created the study started with the conclusion they wanted and worked backward

that's why you're a joke
 
Number Of Homeless Public School Students Hits Record High. Here's Who's Helping

If you want me to agree to immigration and refugees then the American citizens need to be taken care of first.

We have areas with a huge homeless problem. We have an under employment problem. These people need to be taken care of FIRST.

When wages for Americans increase, I can applaud immigration and refugees. American citizens come first.
You clearly did not read the first two posts of this topic.

Immigration increases the wages of native workers.
 
Why Uninsured Drivers Cost Us Over $2.6 Billion a Year ...
www.thefiscaltimes.com/.../Why-Uninsured-Drivers-Cos...
The Fiscal Times
Loading...
Feb 20, 2015 - But the IRC found that “no pay” laws had only a modest effect on ... Others don't have it because they are undocumented immigrants ... Most of the uninsured, however, don't purchase car insurance because they can't afford it.
We could fix that but you won't like. No insurance, meaning no valid card with a valid code, and the car she no go...
 
there are THOUSANDS of ways illegals cost the US taxpayer

you wont find them in your studies because the douchebags that created the study started with the conclusion they wanted and worked backward

A completely made up pile of bullshit, a.k.a. Straw Man Fallacy.

You haven't even looked at them. That much is obvious.

Show where the methodology used in the study by the four economists is flawed, dipshit.

Should be a piece of cake for an Einstein like yourself, no? BWA-HA-HA-HA!
 
there are THOUSANDS of ways illegals cost the US taxpayer

you wont find them in your studies because the douchebags that created the study started with the conclusion they wanted and worked backward

A completely made up pile of bullshit, a.k.a. Straw Man Fallacy.

You haven't even looked at them. That much is obvious.


the idea that a study has to be objective because it is a study is absurd; you're an idiot for even implying that
 
Link:

Numerous studies have found that immigrants bolster growth by increasing the labor force and consumer demand. Rather than being a drain, immigrants generally pay more in taxes than they claim in government benefits. Even a large influx of immigrants does not mean fewer jobs for the existing population, since economies do not have a finite number of jobs. Immigrants often bring skills with them, and some start new businesses, creating jobs for others. The less skilled often take jobs that are hard to fill, like in child care, for example, which allows more parents to work.

A working paper published last year by four economists found that immigration benefited local populations in 19 of the 20 industrialized countries they studied.

Another study found that an influx of refugees into Denmark in the 1990s led native workers to switch to more skilled jobs and away from jobs that were mostly manual labor. As a result, some local workers earned higher wages.

Immigrants can be particularly important for countries like Germany that have low birthrates and aging populations.



How about those leeches we hear so much whining about?

Some officials in Europe, particularly in Britain, have raised another objection to immigration: “benefits tourism,” the idea that immigrants will move simply to take advantage of generous government benefits. But there is little evidence to support this claim.


In Britain, for example, immigrants from the rest of Europe pay more in taxes than they receive in government benefits, according to an analysis by two economists.Another study found that reducing immigration to Britain by 50 percent, along the lines of what Prime Minister David Cameron has advocated, would actually reduce the country’s gross domestic product and force the government to raise tax rates to keep its budget balanced.

Discuss.

It's a mixed bag. Legal immigrants are more likely to be a benefit where illegals are more likely to be a drag on the system. Illegals pay less in taxes and most likely consume more in benefits. Even with that though, illegals create a demand for more goods and services, which does lead to a need for more jobs.
 
Someone clearly has an obsession with Mexicans and does not want to actually read the links I provided, or examine the studies for flaws.

Clearly a retard. I apologize for his clutter. It's just what retards do when their belief system is built on soft bullshit.
 
Someone clearly has an obsession with Mexicans and does not want to actually read the links I provided, or examine the studies for flaws.

Clearly a retard. I apologize for his clutter. It's just what retards do when their belief system is built on soft bullshit.


once again

nobody mentioned Mexicans but you specifically loser

now you've resorted to race-baiting because you're losing
 
Link:

Numerous studies have found that immigrants bolster growth by increasing the labor force and consumer demand. Rather than being a drain, immigrants generally pay more in taxes than they claim in government benefits. Even a large influx of immigrants does not mean fewer jobs for the existing population, since economies do not have a finite number of jobs. Immigrants often bring skills with them, and some start new businesses, creating jobs for others. The less skilled often take jobs that are hard to fill, like in child care, for example, which allows more parents to work.

A working paper published last year by four economists found that immigration benefited local populations in 19 of the 20 industrialized countries they studied.

Another study found that an influx of refugees into Denmark in the 1990s led native workers to switch to more skilled jobs and away from jobs that were mostly manual labor. As a result, some local workers earned higher wages.

Immigrants can be particularly important for countries like Germany that have low birthrates and aging populations.



How about those leeches we hear so much whining about?

Some officials in Europe, particularly in Britain, have raised another objection to immigration: “benefits tourism,” the idea that immigrants will move simply to take advantage of generous government benefits. But there is little evidence to support this claim.


In Britain, for example, immigrants from the rest of Europe pay more in taxes than they receive in government benefits, according to an analysis by two economists.Another study found that reducing immigration to Britain by 50 percent, along the lines of what Prime Minister David Cameron has advocated, would actually reduce the country’s gross domestic product and force the government to raise tax rates to keep its budget balanced.

Discuss.

It's a mixed bag. Legal immigrants are more likely to be a benefit where illegals are more likely to be a drag on the system. Illegals pay less in taxes and most likely consume more in benefits. Even with that though, illegals create a demand for more goods and services, which does lead to a need for more jobs.
If we offer a path to citizenship or legal status to illegals, then they can start providing the same net benefits other immigrants do.

They can start up businesses, pay taxes, and contribute to increasing wages for native workers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top