Immigration LAW 1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324

[danielpalos]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

Why won’t you discuss US Code and Immigration Law?

Why are you deflecting and ignoring the topic of discussion?

Our supreme law of the land is more supreme than any implied right wing fantasy.

There is no fantasy. It's all in your head.

Please define this Right Wing Fantasy where you say that The US has no right to manage Immigration and Define Citizenship.

Otherwise, you are just trolling.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance of the law.

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

Why such lack of Faith, right wingers.

I did. It is null and void from Inception when found to be implied by right wing fantasy instead of express through the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

 

[The Original Tree]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

Why won’t you discuss US Code and Immigration Law?

Why are you deflecting and ignoring the topic of discussion?

There is no fantasy. It's all in your head.

Please define this Right Wing Fantasy where you say that The US has no right to manage Immigration and Define Citizenship.

Otherwise, you are just trolling.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance of the law.

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

Why such lack of Faith, right wingers.

I did. It is null and void from Inception when found to be implied by right wing fantasy instead of express through the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

Again, Broken record, and Empty Head.

There is no fantasy. This is a discussion board. A discussion over facts, and Immigration Law that you claim does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that The United States Congress does not have the right to create The Immigration Law they Legislated, and passed in to law.

I and others have posted actual existent immigration law on the books and enforceable by The Federal Government.

You claim that Immigration Law does not exist, and that The United States as a Sovereign Nation has no right to create Immigration Legislation.

You claim that The United States Congress has no power to Legislate over Immigration and Naturalization and Citizenship.

 

[Rigby5]

I am not the one appealing to ignorance of express, Constitutional law.

Jurisdiction is our remedy.

The Constitution Expressly tells us that Congress has the Power TO Legislate, and it is From Congress that we get Immigration Law. Furthermore The Constitution Article 1 Section 8 gives The United States Government, and the Legislature the power to Regulate Immigration and Define Citizenship and other Legal Statuses.

The 14th Amendment also addresses the question of Citizenship and US Jurisdiction over the Legal Status of persons in The US, and who we have Jurisdiction over, and whom we can deport because another Nation has the Jurisdiction over them as their country of origin.

You are just plain wrong in saying that we do not have The Constitutional and Legal Authority to manage immigration and enforce Immigration Law.

You are just trolling at this point.

You are simply appealing to ignorance of our express establishment clause for naturalization, every time the right wing has nothing but bigotry instead of valid and rational arguments.

This is nothing but word salad and means nothing.

You are just trolling and you have no argument.

Immigration Law Exists.

Pretending it does not exist does not help you with your unintelligible and nonsensical argument and advocacy for open borders and decriminalization of Illegal immigration.

The Law exists.

Have Congress Change it since they wrote it if you don't like it.

Our supreme law of the land is more supreme than any implied right wing fantasy.

There is no fantasy. It's all in your head.

Please define this Right Wing Fantasy where you say that The US has no right to manage Immigration and Define Citizenship.

Otherwise, you are just trolling.

The 9th and 10th amendments say the opposite, that there has to be explicit authorization granted in the Constitution, or then by default there is no federal jurisdiction possible at all.

However, citizenship is different. That is granted to the federal government in the Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

Why won’t you discuss US Code and Immigration Law?

Why are you deflecting and ignoring the topic of discussion?

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance of the law.

Why such lack of Faith, right wingers.

I did. It is null and void from Inception when found to be implied by right wing fantasy instead of express through the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

Again, Broken record, and Empty Head.

There is no fantasy. This is a discussion board. A discussion over facts, and Immigration Law that you claim does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that The United States Congress does not have the right to create The Immigration Law they Legislated, and passed in to law.

I and others have posted actual existent immigration law on the books and enforceable by The Federal Government.

You claim that Immigration Law does not exist, and that The United States as a Sovereign Nation has no right to create Immigration Legislation.

You claim that The United States Congress has no power to Legislate over Immigration and Naturalization and Citizenship.

I am not the one appealing to ignorance of our Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Constitution Expressly tells us that Congress has the Power TO Legislate, and it is From Congress that we get Immigration Law. Furthermore The Constitution Article 1 Section 8 gives The United States Government, and the Legislature the power to Regulate Immigration and Define Citizenship and other Legal Statuses.

The 14th Amendment also addresses the question of Citizenship and US Jurisdiction over the Legal Status of persons in The US, and who we have Jurisdiction over, and whom we can deport because another Nation has the Jurisdiction over them as their country of origin.

You are just plain wrong in saying that we do not have The Constitutional and Legal Authority to manage immigration and enforce Immigration Law.

You are just trolling at this point.

You are simply appealing to ignorance of our express establishment clause for naturalization, every time the right wing has nothing but bigotry instead of valid and rational arguments.

This is nothing but word salad and means nothing.

You are just trolling and you have no argument.

Immigration Law Exists.

Pretending it does not exist does not help you with your unintelligible and nonsensical argument and advocacy for open borders and decriminalization of Illegal immigration.

The Law exists.

Have Congress Change it since they wrote it if you don't like it.

Our supreme law of the land is more supreme than any implied right wing fantasy.

There is no fantasy. It's all in your head.

Please define this Right Wing Fantasy where you say that The US has no right to manage Immigration and Define Citizenship.

Otherwise, you are just trolling.

The 9th and 10th amendments say the opposite, that there has to be explicit authorization granted in the Constitution, or then by default there is no federal jurisdiction possible at all.

Those are just words, feelings and opinion.

You are unable to prove your assertion that Congress does not have the right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

Please Prove that Immigration Law does not exist, and that Congress does not have a right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

 

[The Original Tree]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

Why won’t you discuss US Code and Immigration Law?

Why are you deflecting and ignoring the topic of discussion?

I did. It is null and void from Inception when found to be implied by right wing fantasy instead of express through the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

Again, Broken record, and Empty Head.

There is no fantasy. This is a discussion board. A discussion over facts, and Immigration Law that you claim does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that The United States Congress does not have the right to create The Immigration Law they Legislated, and passed in to law.

I and others have posted actual existent immigration law on the books and enforceable by The Federal Government.

You claim that Immigration Law does not exist, and that The United States as a Sovereign Nation has no right to create Immigration Legislation.

You claim that The United States Congress has no power to Legislate over Immigration and Naturalization and Citizenship.

I am not the one appealing to ignorance of our Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Those are just words, feelings and opinion.

You are unable to prove your assertion that Congress does not have the right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

Please Prove that Immigration Law does not exist, and that Congress does not have a right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

 

[The Original Tree]

New and Better Asylum Rules Coming which Democrats will fight Tooth and Nail.

Senate meeting erupts as Graham clashes with Dems over asylum bill: 'You're not going to take my job!'

The bill itself calls for asylum claims from the Northern Triangle of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador to be made at refugee centers to be set up in Central America and Mexico

The bill also calls for 500 new immigration judges so that cases are handled more swiftly, reducing the current backlog of cases.

“I don’t want to separate families, I want to adjudicate families,” Graham said Thursday.

The bill would also allow unaccompanied children from Central America to be sent back to their home country after screening, as is the case with children who enter from Canada and Mexico.

 

[Rigby5]

One of Dr. Strangelove's projects? There is no express immigration clause in our supreme law of the land.

The Constitution does talk about Citizenship of persons that The US has jurisdiction over due to their legal status in the country.
This is where we derive the power to manage immigration and create and enforce Immigration law.

That can only happen in one of Dr. Strangelove's, right wing fantasies. There is no express immigration clause in our supreme law of the land, by intelligent design.

There is an express establishment clause for naturalization every time the right wing has nothing but implied right wing fantasy.

Are you Insane?

The United States by Law has the right to manage Immigration, determine guidelines for applying for legal status and achieving Citizenship. This Authority comes from Article 1 Section 8 of The Constitution, and from there, we have Immigration Law, Naturalization Acts, etc. etc, spelling out The Rules, Procedures and Laws governing Immigration and defining Citizenship.

SCOTUS has agreed that The United States has this Authority.

It's The Law of The Land.

Just because you are for Open Borders does not mean you have to lie about our Laws and our Constitution.

The states have the sovereign right to each manage what resources they want and need, like immigrants.
The federal government can control who gets to be citizens, but not who gets to immigrate on a temporary or permanent basis.
We have no legal basis for federal immigration law in the Constitution.

The SCOTUS is wrong on many things.
Alcohol prohibition was wrong but by amendment.
Slavery and Dred Scott was wrong.
The war on drugs was wrong.

That's wrong. People do not apply for immigration to a State. They have to apply to immigrate to The United States and those applications are managed by The Federal Government, not The States.

You like the other Russian Bot are insane and wrong.

And it's amazing that you even try this crap when Immigration Law is clearly posted here, and there are many links to Federal Statutes, Naturalization Acts, and all information necessary to research Immigration Law, even drilling down to The Constitutional Right of The Legislature to Create Immigration Law, and The Right of the Federal Government to Enforce it.

It's all there for you to read.

You don't want to discuss the law, so you discuss your feelings and opinions and ignore The Law.

Who applies for green cards?
It is the employer.
The state can be the employer for the purposes of paperwork.

Federal immigration statutes are not law.
Law is a hierarchy with inherent rights being the source, then the Constitution, which then is supposed to authorize legislation.
But federal immigration statutes are an invention from around 1920, that has no basis in law.

 

[Rigby5]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

I did. It is null and void from Inception when found to be implied by right wing fantasy instead of express through the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

Again, Broken record, and Empty Head.

There is no fantasy. This is a discussion board. A discussion over facts, and Immigration Law that you claim does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that The United States Congress does not have the right to create The Immigration Law they Legislated, and passed in to law.

I and others have posted actual existent immigration law on the books and enforceable by The Federal Government.

You claim that Immigration Law does not exist, and that The United States as a Sovereign Nation has no right to create Immigration Legislation.

You claim that The United States Congress has no power to Legislate over Immigration and Naturalization and Citizenship.

I am not the one appealing to ignorance of our Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Those are just words, feelings and opinion.

You are unable to prove your assertion that Congress does not have the right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

Please Prove that Immigration Law does not exist, and that Congress does not have a right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

{...
Amendment 9
- Other Rights Kept by the People

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10
- Undelegated Powers Kept by the States and the People

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
...}

The whole point of the Bill of Rights was to constrain the federal government.
The states did not want the federal government assuming any additional powers, so they insisted the Bill of Rights say that the feds only had what authority it was explicitly delegated in the Constitution.
But no where in the Constitution is there any authority over immigration delegated to the federal government.

 

[Rigby5]

New and Better Asylum Rules Coming which Democrats will fight Tooth and Nail.

Senate meeting erupts as Graham clashes with Dems over asylum bill: 'You're not going to take my job!'

The bill itself calls for asylum claims from the Northern Triangle of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador to be made at refugee centers to be set up in Central America and Mexico

The bill also calls for 500 new immigration judges so that cases are handled more swiftly, reducing the current backlog of cases.

“I don’t want to separate families, I want to adjudicate families,” Graham said Thursday.

The bill would also allow unaccompanied children from Central America to be sent back to their home country after screening, as is the case with children who enter from Canada and Mexico.

Sounds ok to me?

 

[busybee01]

Upholding The Law is virtuous.

Breaking the Law is Whoredom.

You and your party are Whores.

Do you spread your legs for everyone that wants a piece of Ass?

America is the most generous
Nation on the planet, but selling America like a cheap whore Is immoral, like you are.

Why are you pimping out Lady Liberty like a Prostitute?

If you think I am going to participate in your phony poll, you are crazy. You are the one who hates America. We are all immigrants. Compassion is a American value and your hatred is un-American.

hh

You are the one who is prostituting yourself to Trump. America is the most generous and moral country on this planet and that is why they oppose Trump's policies. You are the whore who has his tongues so far up Trump's ass that you have no brain.

The trouble is that no laws were broken. You and your party are the whores and Trump is the pimp.

I understand that you did not bother to read Immigration Laws posted in this thread. Like any LibTard DemNazi, they think if they Ignore Reading, Seeing and Hearing about The Law, that it does not exist.

Yes, he broke the Law, intentionally. That is why he went down there, to find an occasion to Break the Law and then make a video about it.

He did not break the law. Requesting asylum is legal. You seem to want to ignore the asylum laws in tis country.

 

[busybee01]

Lol Polls.

Nobody pays attention to those and it has zero to do with Immigration Law already on the books which we are required to enforce.

Sucks to be an Anti-American Loser.

Trump will have a Super Majority in 2020 thanks to you losers and your Anti-American policies

Yes, we get it. American Citizens and their president are Rats and they only people who have virtue are those that hate America and break its laws.

We understand you perfectly.

It is cause for her to be looked at by a doctor. You can argue whether she should be here or not but she needed immediate medical attention. You as usual make wild accusations and generally show what a hateful person you are. You have no proof anyone is getting the wrong representation.

Why didn't The Senator, fly to Baltimore to help Baltimore Citizens fight Rats?

More lies by Trump. The biggest rat is in the White House while smaller rats like you are running around this country. These are the rats we need to get rid of.

A majority of Americans oppose Trump's immigration policies.

FOX News poll 7/24
Border security
Approve 44%
Disapprove 52%

Immigration
Approve 41%
Disapprove 54%

Fox News Poll, 7/24

This is Trump News aka Fox News giving you the bad news. You want to ignore it because your Fuerher is losing. The polls were so off in 2018 weren't they?

 

[busybee01]

New and Better Asylum Rules Coming which Democrats will fight Tooth and Nail.

Senate meeting erupts as Graham clashes with Dems over asylum bill: 'You're not going to take my job!'

The bill itself calls for asylum claims from the Northern Triangle of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador to be made at refugee centers to be set up in Central America and Mexico

The bill also calls for 500 new immigration judges so that cases are handled more swiftly, reducing the current backlog of cases.

“I don’t want to separate families, I want to adjudicate families,” Graham said Thursday.

The bill would also allow unaccompanied children from Central America to be sent back to their home country after screening, as is the case with children who enter from Canada and Mexico.

Graham is a fascist pig. Republicans need to lose the Senate. They cannot be trusted with power.

 

[The Original Tree]

How about you Prove Immigration Law does not exist and that Congress has no right to create Immigration Legislation nor the Federal Gov enforce it?

Your feelings and opinion don’t count.

I am not the one implying right wing fantasy over our express supreme law of the land.

Again, Broken record, and Empty Head.

There is no fantasy. This is a discussion board. A discussion over facts, and Immigration Law that you claim does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that The United States Congress does not have the right to create The Immigration Law they Legislated, and passed in to law.

I and others have posted actual existent immigration law on the books and enforceable by The Federal Government.

You claim that Immigration Law does not exist, and that The United States as a Sovereign Nation has no right to create Immigration Legislation.

You claim that The United States Congress has no power to Legislate over Immigration and Naturalization and Citizenship.

I am not the one appealing to ignorance of our Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Those are just words, feelings and opinion.

You are unable to prove your assertion that Congress does not have the right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

Please Prove that Immigration Law does not exist, and that Congress does not have a right to Legislate on Matters of Immigration, Naturalization, Citizenship and Border Security.

{...
Amendment 9
- Other Rights Kept by the People

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10
- Undelegated Powers Kept by the States and the People

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
...}

The whole point of the Bill of Rights was to constrain the federal government.
The states did not want the federal government assuming any additional powers, so they insisted the Bill of Rights say that the feds only had what authority it was explicitly delegated in the Constitution.
But no where in the Constitution is there any authority over immigration delegated to the federal government.

I hate to tell you this, but it is The Constitution which gives Jurisdiction of the US Federal Government and Congress to Legislate Immigration Law, and to allow The Federal Government to enforce it.

Not sure what Law School you went to, maybe in The Virgin Islands, but you should send your degree back.

You completely don't understand The Constitution which is called "The Framework" of our Nation's Rights, Privileges, and Law, as a basic set of principles, and then Congress Legislates based on those principle and expounds upon them.

Immigration Law on the Books currently is Constitutional and have passed the test.

US Code is created by Legislative Actions, which is a Constitutional Process by which Bills are Introduced and become Law.

You also ignored other parts of The Constitution addressing Citizenship & Naturalization. Particluarly the 14th amendment which confirms already existent jurisdiction over non citizens of legal status in THE US. That was passed in 1870 by through Republican Efforts to address Democrat Plantation Owners still holding slaves, and The Democrat South's Denial of Civil Rights to Freed Slaves. It gave all the offspring of Freed Slaves (they had legal status in The US) Citizenship.

Do you bother reading at all? Did you ignore the Title of The Thread?


Immigration LAW 1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324


This is just one law out of many that regulate immigration.

In 2010 Congress tried to pass Obama's Dream Act. It failed to pass. Never became Law. The Dems have tried to pass it several times. Obama then signed DACA to delay enforcement of current immigration law. DACA is not law, and the only reason it has not expired is because of battles in court, but ultimately those all will be lost, because it's just an EO.

Here are a few of our Immigration Laws, passed by Congress over the years:

1790 Naturalization Act of 1790 Established the rules for naturalized citizenship, as per Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, but placed no restrictions on immigration. Citizenship was limited to white persons, with no other restriction on non-whites. Note: this is a restriction on naturalization (voting and office-holding), not on immigration.

1795 Naturalization Act of 1795 Lengthened required residency to become citizen. Again, this is a restriction on naturalization, not on immigration.

1798 Naturalization Act(officially An Act to Establish a Uniform Rule of Naturalization; ch. 54, 1 Stat. 566)

Alien Friends Act(officially An Act Concerning Aliens; ch. 58, 1 Stat. 570)

Alien Enemies Act(officially An Act Respecting Alien Enemies; ch. 66, 1 Stat. 577)

• 
  
  
  • Extended the duration of residence required for immigrants to become citizens to 14 years. Enacted June 18, 1798, with no expiration date, it was repealed in 1802.
  • Authorized the president to deport any resident immigrant considered "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States." It was activated June 25, 1798, with a two-year expiration date.
  • Authorized the president to apprehend and deport resident aliens if their home countries were at war with the United States of America. Enacted July 6, 1798, and providing no sunset provision, the act remains intact today as 50 U.S.C. § 21

1802 Naturalization Law of 1802

• 
  
  
  • Repealed the 14-year residency requirement of Naturalization Act of 1798.

1870 Naturalization Act of 1870

• 
  
  
  • Extended the naturalization process to "aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent."
  • Other non-whites were not included in this act and remained excluded from naturalization, per the Naturalization Act of 1790

1875 Page Act of 1875 (Sect. 141, 18 Stat. 477, 1873-March 1875)

• 
  
  
  • The first federal immigration law and prohibited the entry of immigrants considered as "undesirable"
  • The law classified as "undesirable" any individual from Asia who was coming to America to be a contract laborer
  • Strengthen the ban against "coolie" laborers, by imposing a fine of up to $2,000 and maximum jail sentence of one year upon anyone who tried to bring a person from China, Japan, or any oriental country to the United States "without their free and voluntary consent, for the purpose of holding them to a term of service"

1882 Chinese Exclusion Act

• 
  
  
  • Restricted immigration of Chinese laborers for 10 years.
  • Prohibited Chinese naturalization.
  • Provided deportation procedures for illegal Chinese.
  • Marked the birth of illegal immigration (in America).[1]
  • The Act was "a response to racism [in America] and to anxiety about threats from cheap labor [from China]." [2]

1882 Immigration Act of 1882

• 
  
  
  • Imposed a 50 cent head tax to fund immigration officials.

1885 Alien Contract Labor Law (Sess. II Chap. 164; 23 Stat. 332) Prohibited the importation and migration of foreigners and aliens under contract or agreement to perform labor in the United States

1891 Immigration Act of 1891

• 
  
  
  • First comprehensive immigration laws for the US.
  • Bureau of Immigration set up in the Treasury Dept.[3]
  • Immigration Bureau directed to deport unlawful aliens.
  • Empowered "the superintendent of immigration to enforce immigration laws".[4]

1892 Geary Act Extended and strengthened the Chinese Exclusion Act.

1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark[5] The Supreme Court ruled that a child of Chinese descent born in the United States - whose parents at the time of his birth are subjects of the Emperor of China but who are domiciled in the United States as permanent residents; are carrying on business there; and are not employed in any diplomatic or other official capacity under the Emperor of China - is a citizen of the United States by virtue of having been born "in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," per the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Several years later, in the wake of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, a number of Chinese immigrants who were otherwise subject to the Chinese Exclusion Act were nonetheless able to claim American citizenship by alleging they were born in San Francisco, and that their birth certificates had been destroyed along with those of everyone else who had been born in San Francisco. "Papers for fictitious children were sold in China, allowing Chinese to immigrate despite the laws." [1]

1903 Immigration Act of 1903(Anarchist Exclusion Act) Added four inadmissible classes: anarchists, people with epilepsy, beggars, and importers of prostitutes

1906 Naturalization Act of 1906

• 
  
  
  • Standardized naturalization procedures
  • Made some knowledge of English a requirement for citizenship
  • Established the Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization

1907 Immigration Act of 1907 Restricted immigration for certain classes of disabled and diseased people

1917 Immigration Act of 1917(Barred Zone Act) Restricted immigration from Asia by creating an "Asiatic Barred Zone" and introduced a reading test for all immigrants over sixteen years of age, with certain exceptions for children, wives, and elderly family members.

1918 Immigration Act of 1918 Expanded on the provisions of the Anarchist Exclusion Act.

1921 Emergency Quota Act

• 
  
  
  • Limited the number of immigrants a year from any country to 3% of those already in the US from that country as per the 1910 census.

"An unintended consequence of the 1920s legislation was an increase in illegal immigration. Many Europeans who did not fall under the quotas migrated to Canada or Mexico, which [as Western Hemisphere nations] were not subject to national-origin quotas; [and] subsequently they slipped into the United States illegally." [6]

1922 The Cable Act of 1922(ch. 411, 42 Stat. 1021, "Married Women’s Independent Nationality Act") Reversed former immigration laws regarding marriage, also known as the Married Women's Citizenship Act or the Women's Citizenship Act. Previously, a woman lost her US citizenship if she married a foreign man, since she assumed the citizenship of her husband, a law that did not apply to men who married foreign women. The law repealed sections 3 and 4 of the Expatriation Act of 1907.

1924 Immigration Act(Johnson-Reed Act)

• 
  
  
  • Imposed first permanent numerical limit on immigration.
  • Began a national-origin quota system.

1924 National Origins Formula

• 
  
  
  • Established with the Immigration Act of 1924.
  • Total annual immigration was capped at 150,000. Immigrants fit into two categories: those from quota-nations and those from non-quota nations.
  • Immigrant visas from quota-nations were restricted to the same ratio of residents from the country of origin out of 150,000 as the ratio of foreign-born nationals in the United States. The percentage out of 150,000 was the relative number of visas a particular nation received.
  • Non-quota nations, notably those contiguous to the United States only had to prove an immigrant's residence in that country of origin for at least two years prior to emigration to the United States.
  • Laborers from Asiatic nations were excluded but exceptions existed for professionals, clergy, and students to obtain visas.

1934
Equal Nationality Act of 1934

• 
  
  
  • Allowed foreign-born children of American mothers and alien fathers who had entered America before age 18 and lived in America for five years to apply for American citizenship for the first time.
  • Made the naturalization process quicker for American women's alien husbands.

1930s
Federal officials deported "Tens of thousands, and possibly more than 400,000, Mexicans and Mexican-Americans... Many, mostly children, were U.S. citizens." [7] "Applications for legal admission into the United States increased following World War II — and so did illegal immigration." [8] Some used fraudulent marriages as their method of illegal entry in the U.S. "Japanese immigration became disproportionately female, as more women left Japan as "picture brides", betrothed to emigrant men into the U.S. whom they had never met." [9]

1940 Nationality Act of 1940 Pertains chiefly to "Nationality at Birth," Nationality through Naturalization," and "Loss of Nationality"

1943 Chinese Exclusion Repeal Act of 1943(Magnuson Act) Repealed the Chinese Exclusion Act and permitted Chinese nationals already in the country to become naturalized citizens. A quota of 105 new Chinese immigrants were allowed into America per year.

1952 Immigration and Nationality Act(McCarran-Walter Act)

• 
  
  
  • Set a quota for aliens with skills needed in the US.
  • Increased the power of the government to deport illegal immigrants suspected of Communist sympathies.

1953 Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590(1953) The Supreme Court found, "The Bill of Rights is a futile authority for the alien seeking admission for the first time to these shores. But while an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders".
1954 Operation Wetback Immigration and Naturalization Service roundup and deportation of illegal immigrants in selected areas of California, Arizona, and Texas along the border. The U.S. Border Patrol later reported that more than 1.3 million people (a number viewed by many to be inflated and not accurate[citation needed]) were deported or left the U.S. voluntarily under the threat of deportation in 1954.[10]
1965 INA Amendments (Hart-Celler Act)

• 
  
  
  • Repealed the national-origin quotas.
  • Initiated a visa system for family reunification and skills.
  • Set a quota for Western Hemisphere immigration.
  • Set a 20k country limit for Eastern Hemisphere aliens.

1966 Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act Cuban nationals who enter, or were already present in the United States, legal status.

1970s The United States saw a total number of illegal immigrants estimated at 1.1 million, or half of one percent of the United States population.

1980s

• 
  
  
  • About 1.3 million illegal immigrants entered the US.

1982 Plyler v. Doe,[11] 457U.S. 202 (1982) The court also stated that illegal immigrants are "within the jurisdiction" of the states in which they reside and, therefore, are under the equal protection laws of the fourteenth amendment, and stated, "We have never suggested that the class of persons who might avail themselves of the equal protection guarantee is less than coextensive with that entitled to due process. To the contrary, we have recognized [457 U.S. 202, 212] that both provisions were fashioned to protect an identical class of persons, and to reach every exercise of state authority."

1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act

• 
  
  
  • Started sanctions for knowingly hiring illegal aliens.
  • Provided amnesty to illegal aliens already in the US.[12]
  • Increased border enforcement.
  • Made it a crime to hire an illegal immigrant

1990s
Over 5.8 million illegal immigrants entered the US in the 1990s.[13] Mexico rose to the head of the list of sending countries, followed by the Philippines, Vietnam, the Dominican Republic, and China.[14]

1990 Immigration Act

• 
  
  
  • Increased legal immigration ceilings.
  • Created a diversity admissions category.
  • Tripled the number of visas for priority workers and professionals with U.S. job offers[citation needed] [15]

1990 United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez[16] The court reiterated the finding of Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590, 596 (1953), "The Bill of Rights is a futile authority for the alien seeking admission for the first time to these shores. But while an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders".
Stated, "those cases in which aliens have been determined to enjoy certain constitutional rights establish only that aliens receive such protections when they have come within the territory of, and have developed substantial connections with, this country. See, e. g., Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 212 ."

1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRaIRA)

• 
  
  
  • Phone verification for worker authentication by employers.
  • Access to welfare benefits more difficult for legal aliens.
  • Increased border enforcement.
  • Reed Amendment attempted to deny visas to former U.S. citizens, but was never enforced[17]

1999 Rodriguez v. United States, 169 F.3d 1342, (11th Cir. 1999) Held that statutes which discriminate within the class of aliens comport with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment (and the equal protection principles it incorporates) so long as they satisfy rational basis scrutiny.
Post 9/11/2001

• 
  
  
  • An estimated 3.1 million immigrants entered the United States illegally between 2000 and 2005.[15]
  • From 1998 to 2001, Mexicans accounted for 68% of immigrants who entered the United States illegally. That percentage jumped to 78% for the years between 2001 and 2005, mostly due to stricter security measures that followed the September 11, 2001 Attacks upon the United States (which more efficiently prevented illegal entry from nations that did not share a land or maritime boundary with the United States).[18]

2002 Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act

• 
  
  
  • Provided for more Border Patrol agents.
  • Requires that schools report foreign students attending classes.
  • Stipulates that foreign nationals in the US will be required to carry IDs with biometric technology.[19]

2002 Homeland Security Act of 2002

• 
  
  
  • Moved all transportation, customs, immigration, and border security agencies to operate under the Department of Homeland Security.
  • Requires agencies to share information and coordinate efforts in relation to national security and border control.
  • Stipulates which agencies are responsible for which duties in relation to immigration and border security.
  • Outlines specific requirements on handling of children in immigration and border issues.

2005 REAL ID Act

• 
  
  
  • Required use of IDs meeting certain security standards to enter government buildings, board planes, open bank accounts.
  • Created more restrictions on political asylum
  • Severely curtailed habeas corpus relief for immigrants
  • Increased immigration enforcement mechanisms
  • Altered judicial review
  • Established national standards for state driver licenses.
  • Cleared the way for the building of border barriers.

2010 DREAM Act FAILED TO PASS'

2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals(executive action)


Then there is US CODE 1325 the next section after 1324 which we have been discussing here, but no one on The LEFT wants to discuss the actual US CODE, because you people are Lawless.

 

[The Original Tree]

8 U.S. Code 1325. Improper entry by alien

(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts

Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(b)  Improper time or place;  civil penalties

Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of--

(1)  at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry);  or

(2)  twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.

Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.


(c)  Marriage fraud

Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.

8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien

 

[Third Party]

Stopping fake asylum applicants is important, but getting rid of the 22 million hiding here is more important. E-verify isn't working, Martial Law may work. We need a concerted effort to deliver new ideas for illegal removal proposed to our government leaders. I say offer rewards to people for help in arrest and removal, similar to the rewards offered by the IRS for tax cheats.

 

[The Original Tree]

8 U.S. Code 1326. Reentry of removed aliens

(a)In general Subject to subsection (b), any alien who

(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed or has departed the United States while an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal is outstanding, and thereafter

(2) enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States, unless (A) prior to his reembarkation at a place outside the United States or his application for admission from foreign contiguous territory, the Attorney General has expressly consented to such alien’s reapplying for admission; or (B) with respect to an alien previously denied admission and removed, unless such alien shall establish that he was not required to obtain such advance consent under this chapter or any prior Act,
shall be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(b) Criminal penalties for reentry of certain removed aliens Notwithstanding subsection (a), in the case of any alien described in such subsection—

(1) whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony), such alien shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;

(2) whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony, such alien shall be fined under such title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both;

(3) who has been excluded from the United States pursuant to section 1225(c) of this title because the alien was excludable under section 1182(a)(3)(B) of this title or who has been removed from the United States pursuant to the provisions of subchapter V, and who thereafter, without the permission of the Attorney General, enters the United States, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under title 18 and imprisoned for a period of 10 years, which sentence shall not run concurrently with any other sentence.[1] or

(4) who was removed from the United States pursuant to section 1231(a)(4)(B) of this title who thereafter, without the permission of the Attorney General, enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States (unless the Attorney General has expressly consented to such alien’s reentry) shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

For the purposes of this subsection, the term “removal” includes any agreement in which an alien stipulates to removal during (or not during) a criminal trial under either Federal or State law.

alien deported pursuant to section 1252(h)(2) [2] of this title who enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States (unless the Attorney General has expressly consented to suchalien’s reentry) shall be incarcerated for the remainder of the sentence of imprisonment which was pending at the time of deportation without any reduction for parole or supervised release. Such alien shall be subject to such other penalties relating to the reentry of deported aliens as may be available under this section or any other provision of law.

(c) Reentry of alien deported prior to completion of term of imprisonment

Any alien deported pursuant to section 1252(h)(2) [2] of this title who enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States (unless the Attorney General has expressly consented to such alien’s reentry) shall be incarcerated for the remainder of the sentence of imprisonment which was pending at the time of deportation without any reduction for parole or supervised release. Such alien shall be subject to such other penalties relating to the reentry of deported aliens as may be available under this section or any other provision of law.

(d) Limitation on collateral attack on underlying deportation orderIn a criminal proceeding under this section, an alien may not challenge the validity of the deportation order described in subsection (a)(1) or subsection unless the alien demonstrates that—

(1) the alien exhausted any administrative remedies that may have been available to seek relief against the order;

(2) the deportation proceedings at which the order was issued improperly deprived the alien of the opportunity for judicial review; and

(3) the entry of the order was fundamentally unfair.

66 Stat. 229; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7345(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4471; Pub. L. 101–649, title V, § 543(b)(3), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5059; Pub. L. 103–322, title XIII, § 130001(b), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2023; Pub. L. 104–132, title IV, §§ 401(c), 438(b), 441(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1267, 1276, 1279; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, §§ 305(b), 308(d)(4)(J), (e)(1)(K), (14)(A), 324(a), (b), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–606, 3009–618 to 3009–620, 3009–629.)

8 U.S. Code § 1326 - Reentry of removed aliens

 

[The Original Tree]

Stopping fake asylum applicants is important, but getting rid of the 22 million hiding here is more important. E-verify isn't working, Martial Law may work. We need a concerted effort to deliver new ideas for illegal removal proposed to our government leaders. I say offer rewards to people for help in arrest and removal, similar to the rewards offered by the IRS for tax cheats.

We have every Law, US CODE, Statute available on the books already to remove EVERY SINGLE ILLEGAL ALIEN HERE.

We need to just enforce The Law, and start Prosecuting Politicians, States, and Municipalities who are Obstructing Justice.

Congress Made The Law, and it is THE US GOVERNMENT'S Responsibility to ENFORCE IT.

The states are supposed to adhere to Federal Law, and if they do not, The Person's Responsible for Adherence to The Law who are engaged in Obstructing Justice should be Prosecuted.

 

[The Original Tree]

Stopping fake asylum applicants is important, but getting rid of the 22 million hiding here is more important. E-verify isn't working, Martial Law may work. We need a concerted effort to deliver new ideas for illegal removal proposed to our government leaders. I say offer rewards to people for help in arrest and removal, similar to the rewards offered by the IRS for tax cheats.

We need to just start punishing employers and politicians, and sanctuary cities who are breaking The Law.

It's really that simple.

 

[The Original Tree]

You cannot help an Illegal Alien Enter in to The US Illegally.

8 U.S. Code § 1327.Aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter

Any person who knowingly aids or assists any alien inadmissible under section 1182(a)(2) (insofar as an alien inadmissible under such section has been convicted of an aggravated felony) or 1182(a)(3) (other than subparagraph (E) thereof) of this title to enter the United States, or who connives or conspires with any person or persons to allow, procure, or permit any such alien to enter the United States, shall be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 8, § 277, 66 Stat. 229; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7346(a), (c)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4471; Pub. L. 101–649, title V, § 543(b)(4), title VI, § 603(a)(16), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5059, 5084; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, § 308(d)(3)(A), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–617.)

8 U.S. Code § 1327 - Aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter