Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,020
- 198
it will be interesting how this new trial plays out
her self defense claim was on shaky ground from the beginning
however the instructions according to the appeals court was wrong
it suggested that she needed to be physically attacked in order
to use self defense which is totally false
and perhaps why the jury returned a verdict in less then a 1/2 hour
I don't think she'll win on self defense in the second trial either. She left the house, got the gun from her car, then came back in and fired the shot. By leaving the house, she removed herself from the danger. She could have simply gotten in the car and drove away. Or run to a neighbor's house and called the cops.
By returning and firing the gun, she became the aggressor. She's just lucky her husband didn't have a gun and stand his ground.
true
however she said she had to return through the house to leave
because the garage door didnt work
it is possible that an abusive mate unplugged the garage door opener
rendering the door in operable
Every electric door opener has a manual release for when the power is out, or if the motor breaks down. Also, every garage has to have windows that can be opened for ventilation per code in case you are working on your car inside the garage.