In Lieu Of Recent Mass Shootings With Assault Rifles,There Seems To Be Mass Ignorance Of What One Is

[Camp]

Let’s just set a firing speed and magazine capacity and call it an assault weapon

Yeah one round per trigger pull is not an assault rifle

The US Army and Marines used those kinds of weapons as assault rifles in WWII and Korea.

 

[Camp]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

 

[Rustic]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

 

[cnm]

LOl! Made my day! 'Gun nut', indeed.

You're still quacking like a duck in that post.

 

[cnm]

No, moron, but you don't punish millions of people for crimes they didn't commit

Therefore mass shootings with assault style rifles are justified.

 

[cnm]

Let’s just set a firing speed and magazine capacity and call it an assault weapon

Yeah one round per trigger pull is not an assault rifle

The US Army and Marines used those kinds of weapons as assault rifles in WWII and Korea.

Semantics as a defence to mass killings. Only in gun nutsville.

 

[Camp]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

 

[Rustic]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

Lol
Typical you can’t back anything up

 

[2aguy]

No, moron, but you don't punish millions of people for crimes they didn't commit

Therefore mass shootings with assault style rifles are justified.

Are you really this stupid....or do you just pretend to be this stupid when you post...


Number of people killed in all mass shootings, 12 in 2018..... 93 not all of these shootings were with rifles...

number of people killed by lawn mowers....every year...over 75

knives are used to murder over 1,500 people every single year....

You do not ban 18 million rifles for the criminal acts of less than 5 people, you dumb twit....

 

[2aguy]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

They already have, you dumb shit...

Staples v United States...

Supreme Court ruling...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire

 

[2aguy]

Let’s just set a firing speed and magazine capacity and call it an assault weapon

Yeah one round per trigger pull is not an assault rifle

In your subjective opinion, not as a fact of law.

Whether or not it’s select-fire, a semi-auto rifle or carbine can be designated an assault weapon as a matter of law and regulated accordingly.

The law determines what is or is not an assault weapon, not the military, not gun manufactures, and not private individuals.

Moron, the Supreme Court has ruled on this over and over again......

Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.
Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

 

[Camp]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

They already have, you dumb shit...

Staples v United States...

Supreme Court ruling...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire

Your link is about machine guns dumb shit. This thread is about defining what an assault weapon is.

 

[Rustic]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

The federal government has no credibility on such things

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There have been far too many mass shootings in the recent History of the United States. Two common factors in these crimes have been “assault rifle” style firearms and for the press and politicians to describe these weapons as “high power.” This is an error, which I will address shortly, but first, a trigger warning—no pun intended. I frankly think trigger warnings are overused, but in this case, I am about to describe terrible things.

Proceed at your own risk.

A Brief History of the Assault Rifle, for Journalists and Legislators

Yes, AR-15 and AK 47's are assault rifles, both the fully automatics, and semi automatics. If you don't know this, you are to stupid to own one, and should be prohibited from doing so. This article is for those that are not gun enthusiasts, and can be confused by the misinformation spewed on this and other sites. This will give you all of the information you need to make donnie gun nut look like the idiot he is telling you about his vast knowledge of firearms.

Enjoy.

Mass ignorance?

Well,that shoes that a lot of people don't give a fuck about guns and dont want to have one.

 

[progressive hunter]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

They already have, you dumb shit...

Staples v United States...

Supreme Court ruling...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire

Your link is about machine guns dumb shit. This thread is about defining what an assault weapon is.

doesnt matter since the 2nd is about all guns, not just what the government says you can have,,

what sense does it make to have the very people the 2nd was intended to protect us against deciding what we can have??

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

doesnt matter since the 2nd is about all guns, not just what the government says you can have,

Obviously false, as has been shown every time this has been tested. Enjoy your stay in fantasyland, troll....

 

[progressive hunter]

doesnt matter since the 2nd is about all guns, not just what the government says you can have,

Obviously false, as has been shown every time this has been tested. Enjoy your stay in fantasyland, troll....

all it shows is how much of a sheeple people we are,,,

 

[Rustic]

There have been far too many mass shootings in the recent History of the United States. Two common factors in these crimes have been “assault rifle” style firearms and for the press and politicians to describe these weapons as “high power.” This is an error, which I will address shortly, but first, a trigger warning—no pun intended. I frankly think trigger warnings are overused, but in this case, I am about to describe terrible things.

Proceed at your own risk.

A Brief History of the Assault Rifle, for Journalists and Legislators

Yes, AR-15 and AK 47's are assault rifles, both the fully automatics, and semi automatics. If you don't know this, you are to stupid to own one, and should be prohibited from doing so. This article is for those that are not gun enthusiasts, and can be confused by the misinformation spewed on this and other sites. This will give you all of the information you need to make donnie gun nut look like the idiot he is telling you about his vast knowledge of firearms.

Enjoy.

Mass ignorance?

Well,that shoes that a lot of people don't give a fuck about guns and dont want to have one.

 

[Rustic]

When did the M1 Garand cease being an assault rifle?

Lol
You have no clue what an so-called “assault rifle” even is shit for brains

So, lacking the ability the answer the question, you fall back on an attempt at an insult post to hide your lack of knowledge or intelligence.
By the way dopey, the law determines the definition of what an assault weapon is, not you.

They already have, you dumb shit...

Staples v United States...

Supreme Court ruling...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire

Your link is about machine guns dumb shit. This thread is about defining what an assault weapon is.

 

[Blues Man]

Let’s just set a firing speed and magazine capacity and call it an assault weapon

Yeah one round per trigger pull is not an assault rifle

In your subjective opinion, not as a fact of law.

Whether or not it’s select-fire, a semi-auto rifle or carbine can be designated an assault weapon as a matter of law and regulated accordingly.

The law determines what is or is not an assault weapon, not the military, not gun manufactures, and not private individuals.

The law is made by fools.

Anyone who thinks the cosmetic features the law uses to define an assault weapon make any difference in the performance of a rifle are even more foolish

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk