In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[danielpalos]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

 

[MizMolly]

Raising taxes to solve the problems in our Republic is one thing. Raising taxes so you can quit your job and still get paid is another.

If it solves simple poverty; why do you care, right winger?

Because it takes my money out of my pocket.

Plus, solving a problem in an immoral way is not something I favor.

lol. quit and go on unemployment. don't whine about it.

Why would I quit my job? I like what I do. I like making decent money and having benefits.

YOu are the one advocating that people should be able to quit a job and still get paid.

Then, stop whining. Only immoral people have a problem helping out the Poor.

Only lousy Christians, do that.

Not enough manly morals to go around, right wingers.

I dont think you understand what morals are, look it up

 

[danielpalos]

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

Don't worry, right winger. It merely requires morals to understand.

Why do you believe solving simple poverty would "destroy an economy"?

You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?

You have no morals for wanting others to support your lazy ass

You have no morals, period

so, why should i care what You think.

 

[danielpalos]

If it solves simple poverty; why do you care, right winger?

Because it takes my money out of my pocket.

Plus, solving a problem in an immoral way is not something I favor.

lol. quit and go on unemployment. don't whine about it.

Why would I quit my job? I like what I do. I like making decent money and having benefits.

YOu are the one advocating that people should be able to quit a job and still get paid.

Then, stop whining. Only immoral people have a problem helping out the Poor.

Only lousy Christians, do that.

Not enough manly morals to go around, right wingers.

I dont think you understand what morals are, look it up

yes, i do. only hypocrites don't.

 

[MizMolly]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

How old are you?

 

[danielpalos]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

How old are you?

old enough to know.

 

[MizMolly]

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

Don't worry, right winger. It merely requires morals to understand.

Why do you believe solving simple poverty would "destroy an economy"?

You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?

You have no morals for wanting others to support your lazy ass

You have no morals, period

so, why should i care what You think.

You dont know me, i dont expect other people to take care of me. Only the truly disabled or elderly should get free help

 

[MizMolly]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

How old are you?

old enough to know.

Apparently not

 

[danielpalos]

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

Don't worry, right winger. It merely requires morals to understand.

Why do you believe solving simple poverty would "destroy an economy"?

You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?

You have no morals for wanting others to support your lazy ass

You have no morals, period

so, why should i care what You think.

You dont know me, i dont expect other people to take care of me. Only the truly disabled or elderly should get free help

I expect our Congress to solve the problems of our Republic. I am not as selfish, as hypocrites.

 

[danielpalos]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

How old are you?

old enough to know.

Apparently not

only in right wing fantasy.

 

[WinterBorn]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

No. Quote one post of mine where I said as much.

 

[danielpalos]

yet, you complain about the poor wanting, "money they haven't worked for".

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

No. Quote one post of mine where I said as much.

don't realize it, yet?

 

[MizMolly]

No I did not. That is an outright lie and you know it. I will object to someone quitting their job and expecting to continue to get paid. That is vastly different and you know it.

no, it isn't. you are merely a hypocrite.

How old are you?

old enough to know.

Apparently not

only in right wing fantasy.

You dont even know how to respond to a post or answer a question.

 

[danielpalos]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

 

[MizMolly]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

 

[danielpalos]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

Why do you believe equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will, is a Bad thing in our at-will employment States?

 

[MizMolly]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

Why do you believe equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will, is a Bad thing in our at-will employment States?

You used the term EQUAL, yet it isnt equal for the working to support the non working

 

[danielpalos]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

Why do you believe equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will, is a Bad thing in our at-will employment States?

You used the term EQUAL, yet it isnt equal for the working to support the non working

why be hypocritical enough to whine about less fortunate illegals, dear?

the law is employment at the will of either party.

 

[MizMolly]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

Why do you believe equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will, is a Bad thing in our at-will employment States?

You used the term EQUAL, yet it isnt equal for the working to support the non working

why be hypocritical enough to whine about less fortunate illegals, dear?

the law is employment at the will of either party.

When did i mention illegals?

 

[MizMolly]

good golly, miss molly,

you really are equal to the right wing on this board;

see how easy and convenient, equality can be.

More nonsense

Why do you believe equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will, is a Bad thing in our at-will employment States?

You used the term EQUAL, yet it isnt equal for the working to support the non working

why be hypocritical enough to whine about less fortunate illegals, dear?

the law is employment at the will of either party.

You must be running out of "bad" words to use. What have i said that is hypocritical?