In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[danielpalos]

quit, and collect unemployment compensation; don't whine about taxes. You Choose to Work. Only fools choose to work and whine about Taxes. Even horses, have more sense.

And who pays the unemployment? Why should others work so that you can sit on your ass? Until you can answer that question, you are just spouting nonsense.

only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, say that.

There is no hypocrisy in working to support yourself.

The hypocrisy is calling people who work "fools" and yet depending on their money to survive. You are the "practitioner of the abomination of hypocrisy"

So why should others work to support you while you sit on your ass?

so others can do the same, when it is their turn.

it is about being social and being able to embrace;

not just simple greed; like, i got mine (with help) but you get yours (with or without help).

 

[WinterBorn]

quit, and collect unemployment compensation; don't whine about taxes. You Choose to Work. Only fools choose to work and whine about Taxes. Even horses, have more sense.

And who pays the unemployment? Why should others work so that you can sit on your ass? Until you can answer that question, you are just spouting nonsense.

only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, say that.

There is no hypocrisy in working to support yourself.

The hypocrisy is calling people who work "fools" and yet depending on their money to survive. You are the "practitioner of the abomination of hypocrisy"

So why should others work to support you while you sit on your ass?

so others can do the same, when it is their turn.

it is about being social and being able to embrace;

not just simple greed; like, i got mine (with help) but you get yours (with or without help).

I am happy to help others get theirs. In fact, I do that now.

And how do we determine when it is someone else's turn? Is there some secret branch of the gov't that will determine it is my year to quit and be supported by others?

Its funny that what you want to embrace is being able to do nothing and be supported. YOu are not advocating that you be allowed to support others.

And how long will you be supported without trying to support yourself?

 

[danielpalos]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

 

[WinterBorn]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

 

[danielpalos]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

 

[WinterBorn]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

I asked a simple question. Why are you so obstinate about answering questions?

 

[WinterBorn]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

I care if it is tax money. Period.

 

[WinterBorn]

This entire diversion has gone on long enough. Either get back to the topic of the thread and create a separate thread on this insanity, or talk to yourself.

 

[danielpalos]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

I asked a simple question. Why are you so obstinate about answering questions?

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

 

[WinterBorn]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

I asked a simple question. Why are you so obstinate about answering questions?

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Completely off topic.

 

[danielpalos]

it can't be about morals if you still don't understand the concepts; so, let's move that "off the table", for now and resort to simple ethics.

Here is the capital situation; Capitalists have a natural rate of unemployment for the benefit of their bottom line, at the expense of Labor.

Individuals don't usually have the resources artificial persons do as Firms in our economy.

The social safety net should be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment through the Eminent Domain of compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Simplifying Government could lower the cost of Government through simplification of social services.

You don't need to whine about taxes, right winger.

Exactly what do I not understand?

Yes, there is a small amount of unemployment that is part of the system. But that is not what we have been discussing. Those who cannot work are different. You are talking about people quitting their job and expecting to be cared for by others. That is completely different.

And you say people have to wait for their turn. How long is their turn?

why do You care if it is not Your tax money that pays for it.

I care if it is tax money. Period.

lol. yeah right; story teller. why do we still have a drug war instead of unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed?

only persons of morals, get moral issues right the first time and never come up with excuses for not having an argument.

 

[danielpalos]

any questions?

 

[WinterBorn]

any questions?

Why? You haven't answered the ones I have already asked?

 

[danielpalos]

any questions?

Why? You haven't answered the ones I have already asked?

thanks for letting me know not to take You seriously about morals or morality in our political arguments;

want to argue?

 

[WinterBorn]

any questions?

Why? You haven't answered the ones I have already asked?

thanks for letting me know not to take You seriously about morals or morality in our political arguments;

want to argue?

Sure. Start a new thread. The topic of this thread is "In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?"

In a debate, both sides answer questions. You refuse.

So how long do you expect to be able to remain unemployed, by choice, and receive payment?

 

[danielpalos]

any questions?

Why? You haven't answered the ones I have already asked?

thanks for letting me know not to take You seriously about morals or morality in our political arguments;

want to argue?

Sure. Start a new thread. The topic of this thread is "In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?"

In a debate, both sides answer questions. You refuse.

So how long do you expect to be able to remain unemployed, by choice, and receive payment?

employment is at will; why do you feel the need to know how the poor make their money?

do we also need to know how the rich make their money?

 

[WinterBorn]

any questions?

Why? You haven't answered the ones I have already asked?

thanks for letting me know not to take You seriously about morals or morality in our political arguments;

want to argue?

Sure. Start a new thread. The topic of this thread is "In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?"

In a debate, both sides answer questions. You refuse.

So how long do you expect to be able to remain unemployed, by choice, and receive payment?

employment is at will; why do you feel the need to know how the poor make their money?

do we also need to know how the rich make their money?

More inventing what I have said?

Back to the topic.

 

[danielpalos]

that is the topic.

Women need money for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States; to even try to fix the problem.

 

[WinterBorn]

that is the topic.

Women need money for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States; to even try to fix the problem.

Not the subtopic you created.

 

[danielpalos]

that is the topic.

Women need money for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States; to even try to fix the problem.

Not the subtopic you created.

not enough morals in it for you?