In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[danielpalos]

Women may have to be cronies simply for capital, not true love for free.

Money is overrated, even women who engage in prostitution and porn don't entirely do it for money, money would be like 20% of the motivation, rest of it is pure greedy passive sexuality.

Because even rich women engage in things which prostitutes and porn stars do.

Please call out on the evil.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism. It is a Capital requirement.

Usually, only fools and horses should Have to work,

especially in Any first world economy.

So everyone (other than fools and horses) should get money for doing nothing? They should be housed, clothed, fed, and have medical needs taken care of, just for being here?

Why do you care, right winger? If you care about how the Poor get their money then you have to care about how the Rich get their money.

Once again, you are challenged on your point and you answer with unrelated nonsense.

First you claim that only fools and horses should work. Then, when challenged about your wish that everyone have all their needs provided for with no effort on their part, you resort to an attempt at class warfare.

I care about how everyone gets their money. The problem with what you want is the same problem as what Counterview wants. You want your needs met by the efforts of others. YOu want someone else to work so you can have what YOU want.

you have nothing but talk, right winger.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

 

[danielpalos]

Women really just need someone to lean on;

hace twerk bien sabroso(se desnuda) video caliente de mi ex http://adpop.me/mr0e

 

[WinterBorn]

Money is overrated, even women who engage in prostitution and porn don't entirely do it for money, money would be like 20% of the motivation, rest of it is pure greedy passive sexuality.

Because even rich women engage in things which prostitutes and porn stars do.

Please call out on the evil.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism. It is a Capital requirement.

Usually, only fools and horses should Have to work,

especially in Any first world economy.

So everyone (other than fools and horses) should get money for doing nothing? They should be housed, clothed, fed, and have medical needs taken care of, just for being here?

Why do you care, right winger? If you care about how the Poor get their money then you have to care about how the Rich get their money.

Once again, you are challenged on your point and you answer with unrelated nonsense.

First you claim that only fools and horses should work. Then, when challenged about your wish that everyone have all their needs provided for with no effort on their part, you resort to an attempt at class warfare.

I care about how everyone gets their money. The problem with what you want is the same problem as what Counterview wants. You want your needs met by the efforts of others. YOu want someone else to work so you can have what YOU want.

you have nothing but talk, right winger.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Please explain what the national debt has to do with your idea that only fools and horses should work? And that everyone else should get everything they need without working?

Yeah, I won't wait for an answer. Just another Red Herring fallacy.

 

[WinterBorn]

Women really just need someone to lean on;

hace twerk bien sabroso(se desnuda) video caliente de mi ex http://adpop.me/mr0e

Not really.

 

[WinterBorn]

Money is overrated, even women who engage in prostitution and porn don't entirely do it for money, money would be like 20% of the motivation, rest of it is pure greedy passive sexuality.

Because even rich women engage in things which prostitutes and porn stars do.

Please call out on the evil.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism. It is a Capital requirement.

Usually, only fools and horses should Have to work,

especially in Any first world economy.

So everyone (other than fools and horses) should get money for doing nothing? They should be housed, clothed, fed, and have medical needs taken care of, just for being here?

Why do you care, right winger? If you care about how the Poor get their money then you have to care about how the Rich get their money.

Once again, you are challenged on your point and you answer with unrelated nonsense.

First you claim that only fools and horses should work. Then, when challenged about your wish that everyone have all their needs provided for with no effort on their part, you resort to an attempt at class warfare.

I care about how everyone gets their money. The problem with what you want is the same problem as what Counterview wants. You want your needs met by the efforts of others. YOu want someone else to work so you can have what YOU want.

you have nothing but talk, right winger.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Nothing but talk?

You want your housing without having to work. Someone has to create the materials with which to build that house. Someone has to transport those materials. Someone has to build the house (including wiring, plumbing ect). And someone has to maintain the house. If no one works, how does all that happen? Or is it just you who doesn't work, and you want others to sacrifice their time, effort, and skills to take care of you? And since you don't work, who pays those people who did the work to provide you with shelter?

The same can be said for everything else you want for free.

 

[danielpalos]

Capital must circulate under Capitalism. It is a Capital requirement.

Usually, only fools and horses should Have to work,

especially in Any first world economy.

So everyone (other than fools and horses) should get money for doing nothing? They should be housed, clothed, fed, and have medical needs taken care of, just for being here?

Why do you care, right winger? If you care about how the Poor get their money then you have to care about how the Rich get their money.

Once again, you are challenged on your point and you answer with unrelated nonsense.

First you claim that only fools and horses should work. Then, when challenged about your wish that everyone have all their needs provided for with no effort on their part, you resort to an attempt at class warfare.

I care about how everyone gets their money. The problem with what you want is the same problem as what Counterview wants. You want your needs met by the efforts of others. YOu want someone else to work so you can have what YOU want.

you have nothing but talk, right winger.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Please explain what the national debt has to do with your idea that only fools and horses should work? And that everyone else should get everything they need without working?

Yeah, I won't wait for an answer. Just another Red Herring fallacy.

lol. keep making up stories, right winger. I know you don't know anything about economics.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs.

 

[danielpalos]

Women really just need someone to lean on;

hace twerk bien sabroso(se desnuda) video caliente de mi ex http://adpop.me/mr0e

Not really.

Yes, really; mostly nice guys simply need to learn how to be better, boy friends.

 

[WinterBorn]

So everyone (other than fools and horses) should get money for doing nothing? They should be housed, clothed, fed, and have medical needs taken care of, just for being here?

Why do you care, right winger? If you care about how the Poor get their money then you have to care about how the Rich get their money.

Once again, you are challenged on your point and you answer with unrelated nonsense.

First you claim that only fools and horses should work. Then, when challenged about your wish that everyone have all their needs provided for with no effort on their part, you resort to an attempt at class warfare.

I care about how everyone gets their money. The problem with what you want is the same problem as what Counterview wants. You want your needs met by the efforts of others. YOu want someone else to work so you can have what YOU want.

you have nothing but talk, right winger.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Please explain what the national debt has to do with your idea that only fools and horses should work? And that everyone else should get everything they need without working?

Yeah, I won't wait for an answer. Just another Red Herring fallacy.

lol. keep making up stories, right winger. I know you don't know anything about economics.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs.

I understand economics quite clearly.

And the post above is a far cry from "only fools and horses should work".

 

[WinterBorn]

Women really just need someone to lean on;

hace twerk bien sabroso(se desnuda) video caliente de mi ex http://adpop.me/mr0e

Not really.

Yes, really; mostly nice guys simply need to learn how to be better, boy friends.

How good you are at being a boyfriend is irrelevant if you never become a boyfriend because you are incompatible with any female you pursue.

 

[danielpalos]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

 

[WinterBorn]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

 

[danielpalos]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

 

[WinterBorn]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

 

[danielpalos]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

 

[WinterBorn]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

 

[danielpalos]

I merely need to be better than story tellers.

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

Don't worry, right winger. It merely requires morals to understand.

Why do you believe solving simple poverty would "destroy an economy"?

You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?

 

[WinterBorn]

Making up what other people say will not improve your chances.

But let’s get back to you dual answers. First it was “only fools and horses should work” and the idea that needs should be met without working. Then it was a $15 hr minimum wage and the ability to draw unemployment compensation even if the unemployment is your choice.

Sure. It is a left wing social concept. It is about equal protection of the law, not any misguided economic opinions regard Labor.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. People should be able to collect unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

It really is that simple.

When the right wing solves for that natural rate of unemployment with Only capitalism, then we can discuss their point of view.

A business owner is not going to fire a good employee. And it boils down to someone owning a business getting to decide who they employ. What you want is for people to be able to quit a job and get money from their previous employer or from the tax payers.

That is Your story right winger; i want a non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that requires social morals for free from the right wing. So, I guess we are stuck and I have to practice Tolerance.

Unemployment compensation should be a general tax on Firms not our current regime.

"non-divine Commune of Heaven on Earth"?? WTF does that mean? Several of your posts show you want to be paid for doing nothing. Not gonna happen.

Tax firms to pay people not to work? Tax firms to pay people who decided to quit their jobs? That would be a good was to destroy an economy.

My social morals are great. I believe we should take care of those who are unable to take care of themselves. But I do NOT believe we should support people just because they choose not to work and quit their job.

Don't worry, right winger. It merely requires morals to understand.

Why do you believe solving simple poverty would "destroy an economy"?

You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?

I have very strong morals. Why do you believe you are entitled to the fruits of my labors, while refusing to labor for yourself?

I am all for solving the poverty for those unable to help themselves. I am all for helping the poor learn what is needed to take care of themselves.

I am wholeheartedly against your claim that only fools and horses should work. Because I do not believe the able bodied should be able to sit on their ass and not work simply because they do not want to work.

As for the line "You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?", that is absolutely a lie.

 

[danielpalos]

You don't understand the concept, right wingers; that is all the Proof, some of us need.

The law is Employment at the Will of Either party; no lie.

 

[WinterBorn]

You don't understand the concept, right wingers; that is all the Proof, some of us need.

The law is Employment at the Will of Either party; no lie.

Your reading comprehension is pathetic. What I stated was a lie was "You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?".

And yes, Employment at the Will of Either party is the law. But you are only paid for working. You can get unemployment if you worked 20 weeks. And there is a set limit for how long you can draw unemployment compensation.

But the kicker is that you must be unemployed through no fault of your own. You cannot quit and draw unemployment. But you can certainly quit.

Your proposal that people be able to quit a job and still draw a check is ridiculous.

 

[danielpalos]

You don't understand the concept, right wingers; that is all the Proof, some of us need.

The law is Employment at the Will of Either party; no lie.

Your reading comprehension is pathetic. What I stated was a lie was "You don't believe in being Legal to the law, but like to call other illegals, illegal?".

And yes, Employment at the Will of Either party is the law. But you are only paid for working. You can get unemployment if you worked 20 weeks. And there is a set limit for how long you can draw unemployment compensation.

But the kicker is that you must be unemployed through no fault of your own. You cannot quit and draw unemployment. But you can certainly quit.

Your proposal that people be able to quit a job and still draw a check is ridiculous.

you don't complain about less fortunate illegals?

too bad, right wingers; too many right wing bakers indulging too many bakers morals for credibility on the right wing. it takes morals to insist on morals from the Age of Iron in modern, corporate welfare times.