In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[WinterBorn]

As for sexual harassment, it is an insidious thing that should be stamped out. And it has nothing to do with what a woman wears or whether or not she is attractive. Just because a woman is beautiful, you do still not have the right to debase her.

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

 

[danielpalos]

As for sexual harassment, it is an insidious thing that should be stamped out. And it has nothing to do with what a woman wears or whether or not she is attractive. Just because a woman is beautiful, you do still not have the right to debase her.

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

 

[WinterBorn]

As for sexual harassment, it is an insidious thing that should be stamped out. And it has nothing to do with what a woman wears or whether or not she is attractive. Just because a woman is beautiful, you do still not have the right to debase her.

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

 

[danielpalos]

As for sexual harassment, it is an insidious thing that should be stamped out. And it has nothing to do with what a woman wears or whether or not she is attractive. Just because a woman is beautiful, you do still not have the right to debase her.

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

ok; how about, i only get that treatment from immoral women for free under our form of Capitalism?

True women of morals should be, sugar and spice and every Thing, Nice.

 

[WinterBorn]

As for sexual harassment, it is an insidious thing that should be stamped out. And it has nothing to do with what a woman wears or whether or not she is attractive. Just because a woman is beautiful, you do still not have the right to debase her.

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

ok; how about, i only get that treatment from immoral women for free under our form of Capitalism?

True women of morals should be, sugar and spice and every Thing, Nice.

So women must always be nice? Bullshit.

 

[danielpalos]

what if,

simply being a bitch, is considered a form of sexual harassment?

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

ok; how about, i only get that treatment from immoral women for free under our form of Capitalism?

True women of morals should be, sugar and spice and every Thing, Nice.

So women must always be nice? Bullshit.

Only in your vacuum of special pleading; they can't always be bitches for free, either.

 

[WinterBorn]

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

ok; how about, i only get that treatment from immoral women for free under our form of Capitalism?

True women of morals should be, sugar and spice and every Thing, Nice.

So women must always be nice? Bullshit.

Only in your vacuum of special pleading; they can't always be bitches for free, either.

No. If a woman is a supervisor in the workplace, maintaining order or following specific workplace regulations comes before you ideas of women being sweet.

 

[WinterBorn]

What you "consider" sexual harassment and the actual definition of sexual harassment are, apparently, two different things.

How is being a bitch sexual?

it is gender related.

The term is not Gender Harassment. Unless it is sexual, it is not sexual harassment.

ok; how about, i only get that treatment from immoral women for free under our form of Capitalism?

True women of morals should be, sugar and spice and every Thing, Nice.

So women must always be nice? Bullshit.

Only in your vacuum of special pleading; they can't always be bitches for free, either.

Your attempt to label my post under the fallacy of Special Pleading is either a lie or an error of ignorance. Look up the actual fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

 

[WinterBorn]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

 

[WinterBorn]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

Can you describe what you mean by "excellent client relations skills"?

 

[danielpalos]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

 

[WinterBorn]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

 

[danielpalos]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

 

[WinterBorn]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

 

[danielpalos]

i can Always find nice girls with excellent client relations skills, when i have money.

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

it requires social morals for free, even when the guy has no money.

 

[WinterBorn]

So you keep saying. But we were discussing your wanting to label a woman being a bitch as sexual harassment.

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

it requires social morals for free, even when the guy has no money.

Define “social morals”.

 

[danielpalos]

it is sexual harassment, if the Only reason she does it, is because I am a poor male.

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

it requires social morals for free, even when the guy has no money.

Define “social morals”.

Civilization doesn't operate in a vacuum of special pleading.

 

[WinterBorn]

If she denigrates men and directs it towards you, it could be considered sexual harassment. But the "poor" part? No.

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

it requires social morals for free, even when the guy has no money.

Define “social morals”.

Civilization doesn't operate in a vacuum of special pleading.

Conversations don’t work unless both people understand what the other one means. I have posted no special pleading fallacy. I specifically asked you to define a phrase you use quite often.

Can you define it?

 

[danielpalos]

True persons of morals should not care if a person is poor or not, unless it requires, capital participation.

Good luck with that.

it requires social morals for free, even when the guy has no money.

Define “social morals”.

Civilization doesn't operate in a vacuum of special pleading.

Conversations don’t work unless both people understand what the other one means. I have posted no special pleading fallacy. I specifically asked you to define a phrase you use quite often.

Can you define it?

Socialism requires social morals for free. Any Religion is a form of socialism. Understand the concepts, now?