Inconvenient historic (climate alarmism) facts

[SSDD]

His second chart shows massive red at the North Pole region, where there are NO stable temperature stations in most of the region.

It is largely made up.

Look at those graphs over time...the warmest places on earth are INVARIABLY the very places with the least data coverage. That fact, in and of itself should tell any thinking person that there is something terribly wrong with climate pseudoscience.

 

[Crick]

The poles are the warmest places on Earth?

 

[SSDD]

The poles are the warmest places on Earth?

According to the graphs you wack jobs provide, the poles are warming faster than anywhere else closely followed by anywhere else with sparse data coverage.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can we say "cherry-picking"?

I didn't think so.

How much recovery has taken place in the last ten years? Zero. What have Arctic temperatures done in that period?

All that scary red in the Arctic means that you fucked with the numbers and it moved from -25F to -22F.

Obama corrupted both justice and science

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The poles are the warmest places on Earth?

According to you graph, the Arctic provided 97% of the imaginary warming

 

[SSDD]

The poles are the warmest places on Earth?

According to you graph, the Arctic provided 97% of the imaginary warming

Amazing...providing all that warming while not warming itself...climate models are amazing.

 

[Old Rocks]

View attachment 196794

Tourist season still closed.

Image 3 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Kind of a dumb shit aren't you, Tommy.

 

[Old Rocks]

Every nation that measures the Arctic Sea Ice states the same thing, that there has been a massive decline in extant and volume in the last 50 years. Only you deniers cannot see that.

 

[SSDD]

Poor old rocks...duped into looking at the short view rather than the long view...which shows that what you are seeing is an oscillation, not a sudden loss of ice. It must really suck to be put in a position where all you have as "evidence" to support your position is obviously cherry picked data showing only an eyeblink of time. Never being able to show the long view because it would make your position positively laughable.

That graph is a prime example....if you look at the longer view, you see that even with the ice loss you think you are showing, there is still a hell of a lot more ice up there now than there has been for most of the past 10,000 years. Here, have a look at the long view and weep....or gnash your teeth...or whatever lamentation the green wackjobs approve of this week.

Look back at 8000 and 9200 years. The arctic was probably ice free at that point...back when demon CO2 was at "safe" levels.

 

[SSDD]

Every nation that measures the Arctic Sea Ice states the same thing, that there has been a massive decline in extant and volume in the last 50 years. Only you deniers cannot see that.

No rocks...the ice extent has taken a slight dip and is on the increase for the past 6 or 8 years...if you want to see a "massive" reduction in ice, you must look back to most of the past 10,000 years. When you take the long view, you see nothing more than a blip in a massive increase of the ice.

 

[ChesBayJJ]

Yawn..... Zzzzz…..

Graph is ghey....more progressive fakery! Notice the vertical axis is not quantifiable. Ghey.....only sells to the low information reader. Progressives post up these graphs dosplaying these gigantic increases or decreases but with no detail on either the horizontal or vertical axis. Fake

What are you talking about? Both axes are labeled and quantifiable.

 

[Crick]

These data show a 75% loss of ice mass over a period of 37 years. That is "a slight dip" only in the eyes of fools and liars.

 

[Wyatt earp]

These data show a 75% loss of ice mass over a period of 37 years. That is "a slight dip" only in the eyes of fools and liars.

I didn't know Ice melts, you learn something new everyday..

 

[Old Rocks]

How could you learn something every day and remain the stupid ass that your posts present? Yes, the extant and the volume of ice is in rapid decline.

 

[SSDD]

Take a look at your graph skidmark...and then look at this one and tell me how anyone other than an idiot could believe that what we are seeing is anything more than a slight dip....look on further back and you see what real ice loss looks like...and you also see that the world, and the sea life, and everything else survived it just fine....the sky didn't fall and the world didn't come to an end....things just moved on...business as usual in a chaotic system.

Your incessant cries of doom, and your misplaced blame puts you up on the top shelf with all the other top shelf dupes. Look at the big picture you idiot and see how irrelevant, and dishonest your eyeblink view is.

Let me know when the ice drops to below the levels of 8000 or 9000 years ago...then at least we will be at the limits of natural variability for the past 10,000 years...then we can look at an even larger picture and see that ice at both of the poles is the anomaly on earth...not the norm.

 

[skookerasbil]

The climate alarmists did themselves a massive disservice years ago when they all jumped on board with the prediction of no ice at the North Pole by 2012. Nobody cares about the sea ice anymore. The climate obsessed made so many of those k00ky predictions on drought, tornados, hurricanes.... people just tune the nonsense out now. The AGW crowd are the new flat earthers to most of the public.

They can talk about all the science that's decided until the cows come home.... like they have been for 10 years in this forum..... but nothing changes. People could not possibly be any more disinterested!!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Take a look at your graph skidmark...and then look at this one and tell me how anyone other than an idiot could believe that what we are seeing is anything more than a slight dip....look on further back and you see what real ice loss looks like...and you also see that the world, and the sea life, and everything else survived it just fine....the sky didn't fall and the world didn't come to an end....things just moved on...business as usual in a chaotic system.

Your incessant cries of doom, and your misplaced blame puts you up on the top shelf with all the other top shelf dupes. Look at the big picture you idiot and see how irrelevant, and dishonest your eyeblink view is.

Let me know when the ice drops to below the levels of 8000 or 9000 years ago...then at least we will be at the limits of natural variability for the past 10,000 years...then we can look at an even larger picture and see that ice at both of the poles is the anomaly on earth...not the norm.

The world has been COOLING for the last 3,000 years, which is about the same time the Sea Ice cover has increased.

 

[expat_panama]

God, are you fucking stupid.

God, you have no point to make here!

--and so the AGW discourse takes a break for prayers.

imho this is why it doesn't matter there's no scientific evidence of AGW, it's the fact that this is simply not a scientific issue to begin with. What we really got here is obviously a religious holy war.

 

[skookerasbil]

God, are you fucking stupid.

God, you have no point to make here!

--and so the AGW discourse takes a break for prayers.

imho this is why it doesn't matter there's no scientific evidence of AGW, it's the fact that this is simply not a scientific issue to begin with. What we really got here is obviously a religious holy war.

Yep...the degree of righteousness in these people is profound. Thankfully, their numbers are laughably low.

 

[expat_panama]

...their numbers are laughably low.

--or if not "low" enough the "laughingly" part's good enough...