XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,972
- 10,619
- 435
The word “if” implies a conditional statement that you’re not addressing in your response.It won't happen.
What if that does happen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The word “if” implies a conditional statement that you’re not addressing in your response.It won't happen.
The word “if” implies a conditional statement that you’re not addressing in your response.
What if that does happen?
Of course my premise is conditional.Your whole premise is conditional, it requires reality taking a dump on itself, then that dump taking another dump.
Of course my premise is conditional.
If Republicans have the opportunity to push a national abortion ban, then they will.
It’s simple. Your claim that it won’t happen doesn’t refute the conditional statement. It just means you don’t know how conditional statements work.
Yet you still can’t explain why I should believe that those on the fence would fight to defend abortion rights in a super majority.No, they won't. Again too many are on the fence on the issue.
I posted two links and pknopp think me fake news, huh?so an interesting piece of news yesterday,
Since Roe was overturned, there are more abortions. Come on demofks, you ain't trying hard enough to get all of em in.
Oh, and my wife read me a figure yesterday that they are killing new borns 10 to 15 days after birth!!!! wow. So Trump didn't lie.
"Born Alive Abortion Survivors Act"
![]()
Tim Walz Removed Requirement to Try to Save Babies Born Alive After Abortion
Kamala Harris’ Minnesota running mate signed a bill in May 2023 that pro-life advocates are calling disturbing.www.ncregister.com
Yet you still can’t explain why I should believe that those on the fence would fight to defend abortion rights in a super majority.
You know why you can’t explain it? Because that’s completely fucking stupid.
Yeah they don’t want to let the people decide
the 'people' shouldn't decide for the individual when it comes to autonomy.
no.
by voting.
Why? They do all the time.the 'people' shouldn't decide for the individual when it comes to autonomy.
Any form of government is the people deciding things for the individual.
Why? They do all the time.
I wasn’t, but not sure how that answers my question.when was the last time you were forced to carry a pregnancy?
gov'ment's place is not inside an individual's uterus.
![]()
I wasn’t, but not sure how that answers my question.
Frankly, it’s the 21st century, there are laws against slavery, so if someone is forcing someone to have babies, they should be prosecuted
Government's place isn't to tell people to get shots
Government's place isn't to tell people not to murder
Government's place isn't to tell people to wear a mask.
That's a weak line of argument, even for you.
ya it is. for the betterment & health of society. a woman's abortion does not affect the person standing next to her in an elevator.
yep, it is.... by prosecuting those that do - sends a message that it's a bozo nono.
mandating a mask in a gov'ment building is certainly ok; as with any private biz'nez that thinks it is a good idea.
<pfffft>