Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone could teach me how to change a tire. But then again, there's always AAA.nothing funnier than dopes and dupes acting like they could ever 'school' ravi on anything...
The genocide against the First Peoples annihilated 90% of more in less than 100 years, far more than the Jews in Europe during WWII, far more than Africans in the Negro Chattel Slavery in the Americas.
They were all awful and not to be understated.
Who was the dolt who said " Before the settlers, the rivers were full of fishes and air was clean." ??????
Cabbie????
Again?
9. These 'Noble Savages' were responsible for the extinction of a number of animals.
‘One successful kill of a number of adult animals,’ wrote Wright, describing the effects on the ecosystem of a jump near Jackson Hole, ‘would have reduced the breeding potential of the local [bison] herd to a level where it was no longer a significant part of the valley ecosystem.'
Chase, Op.Cit., p. 99-100
"Until ten thousand years ago an incredible bestiary of mammals roamed North America.
These were the so-called mega-fauna, an exotic menagerie that included the woollymammoth, saber-toothed tiger, giant sloth, giant beaver, camel, horse, two-toed horse, and dire wolf. These were the dominant fauna on this continent for tens of millions of years. Then suddenly and mysteriously they disappeared."
Ibid.
Now...who could have destroyed all those animals??
There is no evidence of changing climate or habitat....
10. What happens to stone-age mentalities when they destroy the natural resources?
" When Lewis and Clark first met the Shoshone in 1805, they were starving. Their chieftold the explorers they had ‘nothing but berries to eat’...Another explorer, visiting the Lemhi...in 1811, described them as ‘the poorest and most miserable nation I everbeheld; having scarcely anything to subsist on except berries and a few fish’.
Ibid.
a. There is no evidence that tribal peoples ever worried about extinction, or indeed had any concept of it. As Wallace Kaufman points out in "No Turning Back," given the opportunity, they would pursue any prey species in whatever numbers were available, and often for reasons which were quite as frivolous as any associated with modern consumerist societies.
Want an example of said mentality?
Women of the Crow tribe wore dresses decorated with 700 elk teeth. As there were only two of these teeth per elk, each dress each such dress represented 350 slaughtered animals.
"The Crow Indians," by Robert H. Lowie and Phenocia Bauerle
So much for "Noble Savages" living in harmony with nature.
Dude.
Aww, it's so cute when you try to talk about things you don't understand.
But wait! You are claiming mankind affects the environment! Progress!
"
Aww, it's so cute when you try to talk about things you don't understand.
Aww, it's so cute when you try to talk about things you don't understand.
Who was the dolt who said " Before the settlers, the rivers were full of fishes and air was clean." ??????
Cabbie????
Again?
9. These 'Noble Savages' were responsible for the extinction of a number of animals.
‘One successful kill of a number of adult animals,’ wrote Wright, describing the effects on the ecosystem of a jump near Jackson Hole, ‘would have reduced the breeding potential of the local [bison] herd to a level where it was no longer a significant part of the valley ecosystem.'
Chase, Op.Cit., p. 99-100
"Until ten thousand years ago an incredible bestiary of mammals roamed North America.
These were the so-called mega-fauna, an exotic menagerie that included the woollymammoth, saber-toothed tiger, giant sloth, giant beaver, camel, horse, two-toed horse, and dire wolf. These were the dominant fauna on this continent for tens of millions of years. Then suddenly and mysteriously they disappeared."
Ibid.
Now...who could have destroyed all those animals??
There is no evidence of changing climate or habitat....
10. What happens to stone-age mentalities when they destroy the natural resources?
" When Lewis and Clark first met the Shoshone in 1805, they were starving. Their chieftold the explorers they had ‘nothing but berries to eat’...Another explorer, visiting the Lemhi...in 1811, described them as ‘the poorest and most miserable nation I everbeheld; having scarcely anything to subsist on except berries and a few fish’.
Ibid.
a. There is no evidence that tribal peoples ever worried about extinction, or indeed had any concept of it. As Wallace Kaufman points out in "No Turning Back," given the opportunity, they would pursue any prey species in whatever numbers were available, and often for reasons which were quite as frivolous as any associated with modern consumerist societies.
Want an example of said mentality?
Women of the Crow tribe wore dresses decorated with 700 elk teeth. As there were only two of these teeth per elk, each dress each such dress represented 350 slaughtered animals.
"The Crow Indians," by Robert H. Lowie and Phenocia Bauerle
So much for "Noble Savages" living in harmony with nature.
Dude. The saber toot tigers and the rest of those you've listed became extinct before Native Americans were Native Americans.
But wait! You are claiming mankind affects the environment! Progress!
"Dude. The saber toot (sic) tigers and the rest of those you've listed became extinct before Native Americans were Native Americans."
Wrong again.
The extinction of the megafauna coincides with the time the first tribes inhabited the continente.
1. "Saber-toothed cats, American lions, woolly mammoths and other giant creatures once roamed across the American landscape. However, at the end of the late Pleistocene about 12,000 years ago, these "megafauna" went extinct, a die-off called the Quaternary extinction."
Starvation Didn t Wipe Out Sabertooth Cats
2. "Prevailing ideas point to all Native Americans descending from ancient Siberians who moved across the Beringia land bridge between Asia and North America between 26,000 and 18,000 years ago. As time wore on, the thinking goes, these people spread southward and gave rise to the Native American populations encountered by European settlers centuries ago.
: History Travel Arts Science People Places Smithsonian
Perhaps you have a better memory than I......when was the last time you got anything right?
Okay, my bad, the NAs were around then. But they didn't eat saber toothed tigers. Current wisdom shows that the tigers had enough to eat when they went extinct and that would mean the "theory" that the Native Americans wiped out all the big game is incorrect.
Not your fascistic far right wack meaning, PC: never.
Not your fascistic far right wack meaning, PC: never.
Oh, shoot, I forgot you were anti-science.Okay, my bad, the NAs were around then. But they didn't eat saber toothed tigers. Current wisdom shows that the tigers had enough to eat when they went extinct and that would mean the "theory" that the Native Americans wiped out all the big game is incorrect.
Nothing like the testimony of an eye witness!
Thanks so much!
Oh, shoot, I forgot you were anti-science.Okay, my bad, the NAs were around then. But they didn't eat saber toothed tigers. Current wisdom shows that the tigers had enough to eat when they went extinct and that would mean the "theory" that the Native Americans wiped out all the big game is incorrect.
Nothing like the testimony of an eye witness!
Thanks so much!
DNA tests on yet to be found bones will prove Europeans came to Florida and Africans came to South America before the genocidal Asiatic hordes crossed the Bering Strait.Thanks for the "mad" props, gal!
As a Commie, Muslim, Marxist who is bent on destroying America, I must say that your posts give me the perfect opportunity to attack conservatism HEAD ON!
I and my constituents, will not rest until animals pull their human pets around on leashes and toilet paper is replaced with good old dry leaves (hey, I can dream....).
I do not necessarily hold to the notion that native Americans were guiltless saints who could do no wrong, but genocide? Absolutely; to the point where there no longer are full-blooded natives left.
Did the US re-nig on just about any treaty that they ever agreed to? Of course they did.
Does that mean we should give it back? Hell no. We did what we did, but don't expect me to buy into the "poor hapless settlers" or "those godless heathen Injun's."
1. "I do not necessarily hold to the notion that native Americans were guiltless saints who could do no wrong, but genocide? Absolutely; to the point where there no longer are full-blooded natives left."
As a Commie, Muslim, Marxist who is bent on destroying America, most of you lack the ability to use words with precision...as I do....or, as in this case, you use words to alter the reality.
There is a definition of genocide, and this is not it: "...genocide? Absolutely; to the point where there no longer are full-blooded natives left."
The only question is, is it a lie of omission, or one of commission.
'Fess up: do you know that you are lying?
2."I do not necessarily hold to the notion that native Americans were guiltless saints..."
a. They were not 'Native"....merely a little earlier than the European settlers.
Ever hear of the Bering Straits?
b. Now you have retreated from your earlier descriptions of said Indians....but I have no intention of altering my thesis....and, today and tomorrow, I will provide the education you are so sorely lacking.
Keep that meter running, Cabbie!
More to come!
Bones are hard to find, because the people got eaten.
No, apparently it was not for lack of suitable prey. See article below....and they could have eaten the NAs if they had run out of other prey.Adaptations that made saber-toothed cats a successful hunter also made the cats vulnerable to extinction. They most likely went belly up due to a lack of suitable prey.
It took around 8 million years for a new type of saber-tooth to fill the niche of an extinct predecessor; this happened at least four times with different families of animals developing these adaptation(s).
Furthermore, Sabers existed in Asia, Europe and elsewhere -- did native Americans hunt them into extinction overseas, as well?
No, apparently it was not for lack of suitable prey. See article below....and they could have eaten the NAs if they had run out of other prey.Adaptations that made saber-toothed cats a successful hunter also made the cats vulnerable to extinction. They most likely went belly up due to a lack of suitable prey.
It took around 8 million years for a new type of saber-tooth to fill the niche of an extinct predecessor; this happened at least four times with different families of animals developing these adaptation(s).
Furthermore, Sabers existed in Asia, Europe and elsewhere -- did native Americans hunt them into extinction overseas, as well?
Starvation Didn t Wipe Out Sabertooth Cats
There is some evidence that Noah didn't let them on the ark.No, apparently it was not for lack of suitable prey. See article below....and they could have eaten the NAs if they had run out of other prey.Adaptations that made saber-toothed cats a successful hunter also made the cats vulnerable to extinction. They most likely went belly up due to a lack of suitable prey.
It took around 8 million years for a new type of saber-tooth to fill the niche of an extinct predecessor; this happened at least four times with different families of animals developing these adaptation(s).
Furthermore, Sabers existed in Asia, Europe and elsewhere -- did native Americans hunt them into extinction overseas, as well?
Starvation Didn t Wipe Out Sabertooth Cats
Kind of a wild guess by me, thanks for pointing that out.
The article still did not offer a reason, certainly not because of over harvesting.
I do not imagine that the natives would have targeted such a dangerous animal with so much more prey available.
No, apparently it was not for lack of suitable prey. See article below....and they could have eaten the NAs if they had run out of other prey.Adaptations that made saber-toothed cats a successful hunter also made the cats vulnerable to extinction. They most likely went belly up due to a lack of suitable prey.
It took around 8 million years for a new type of saber-tooth to fill the niche of an extinct predecessor; this happened at least four times with different families of animals developing these adaptation(s).
Furthermore, Sabers existed in Asia, Europe and elsewhere -- did native Americans hunt them into extinction overseas, as well?
Starvation Didn t Wipe Out Sabertooth Cats
Kind of a wild guess by me, thanks for pointing that out.
The article still did not offer a reason, certainly not because of over harvesting.
I do not imagine that the natives would have targeted such a dangerous animal with so much more prey available.
No, apparently it was not for lack of suitable prey. See article below....and they could have eaten the NAs if they had run out of other prey.Adaptations that made saber-toothed cats a successful hunter also made the cats vulnerable to extinction. They most likely went belly up due to a lack of suitable prey.
It took around 8 million years for a new type of saber-tooth to fill the niche of an extinct predecessor; this happened at least four times with different families of animals developing these adaptation(s).
Furthermore, Sabers existed in Asia, Europe and elsewhere -- did native Americans hunt them into extinction overseas, as well?
Starvation Didn t Wipe Out Sabertooth Cats
Kind of a wild guess by me, thanks for pointing that out.
The article still did not offer a reason, certainly not because of over harvesting.
I do not imagine that the natives would have targeted such a dangerous animal with so much more prey available.
They'd be a target for the simple fact the indians didnt like being eaten by them.
