Integrity On Sale

[Obiwan]

It's always a coin toss on whether you lie, outright, or are too dumb to know the truth.

Hitler as as much an scion of Marx as Lenin was.

1. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.

2. Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


Don't every change.

I will quote Hitler himself, directly from Mein Kampf, and then you can wallow in your own ignorance:

"As I delved more deeply into the teachings of Marxism and thus in tranquil clarity submitted the deeds of the Jewish people to contemplation, Fate itself gave me its answer.

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet.

If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands l of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men."

Mein Kampf: Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna

Now shut up and quit making a fool of yourself. You agree with Hitler on Marxism.

Hitler was doing what you do all the time, NYLiar.
His tome was a polemic......better look that up.



I provided the Link, and the statement of a scholar.

Ooop...you don't know what a scholar is, do you.

You don't know that Hitler wrote a book, apparently.

I assume you've read it...

After all, since George Soros (the guy that funds the Democrats) is an unapologetic Nazi who has stated that sending Jews to the death camps were "the best years of his life", you would take a keen interest in your "master's" beliefs....

Are you trying to equate Soros with PoliticalChic?

Of course not...

But since YOU apparently want to discuss Nazis, I just thought you might like to add your comments about the Democrats' chief financier working with the Nazis to send Jews to the death camps (and admitting he ENJOYED doing it)!!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

I will quote Hitler himself, directly from Mein Kampf, and then you can wallow in your own ignorance:

"As I delved more deeply into the teachings of Marxism and thus in tranquil clarity submitted the deeds of the Jewish people to contemplation, Fate itself gave me its answer.

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet.

If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands l of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men."

Mein Kampf: Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna

Now shut up and quit making a fool of yourself. You agree with Hitler on Marxism.

Hitler was doing what you do all the time, NYLiar.
His tome was a polemic......better look that up.



I provided the Link, and the statement of a scholar.

Ooop...you don't know what a scholar is, do you.

You don't know that Hitler wrote a book, apparently.

I assume you've read it...

After all, since George Soros (the guy that funds the Democrats) is an unapologetic Nazi who has stated that sending Jews to the death camps were "the best years of his life", you would take a keen interest in your "master's" beliefs....

Are you trying to equate Soros with PoliticalChic?

Of course not...

But since YOU apparently want to discuss Nazis, I just thought you might like to add your comments about the Democrats' chief financier working with the Nazis to send Jews to the death camps (and admitting he ENJOYED doing it)!!!!

I've been through the anti-Soros propaganda.

This thread is about PoliticalChic agreeing with Hitler about socialists, democrats, and Marxists.

 

[jknowgood]

So...you missed this?

It just doesn't matter to Leftist voter.

That's Liberals, Progressives, Democrats......socialists.

A guy could be a rapist.....(cough..BillClinton)

A traitor who tried to make a pact with Moscow....(coughcouthTedKennedy)

They shrug at the mention of the 100 million slain by their progenitors, the Soviet Communists.

Or...an indicted lying fraud of a Secretary of State....

No biggie.



"More than half of Democrats say Hillary should stay in the race even if she's indictedover emailgate – but just 31 percent of voters trust her"
Most Democrats say Hillary should stay in the race if indicted

Your descriptions are laughable .

How about what I said about your GOP front runner?

So....after I proved these undeniable facts...
That's Liberals, Progressives, Democrats......socialists.

A guy could be a rapist.....(cough..BillClinton)

A traitor who tried to make a pact with Moscow....(coughcouthTedKennedy)

They shrug at the mention of the 100 million slain by their progenitors, the Soviet Communists.

Or...an indicted lying fraud of a Secretary of State....



You prove the OP, that dolts like you Democrats/Liberals/Progressives eye them and simply shrug.

You left out the war criminals Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of that criminal enterprise.

Bush legally went to war. It's Obama that prefers to bypass congress.

Bush has been accused of being a war criminal. To PoliticalChic that proves he's guilty.

Just accused? With Clinton that's not good enough.

 

[Obiwan]

Hitler was doing what you do all the time, NYLiar.
His tome was a polemic......better look that up.



I provided the Link, and the statement of a scholar.

Ooop...you don't know what a scholar is, do you.

You don't know that Hitler wrote a book, apparently.

I assume you've read it...

After all, since George Soros (the guy that funds the Democrats) is an unapologetic Nazi who has stated that sending Jews to the death camps were "the best years of his life", you would take a keen interest in your "master's" beliefs....

Are you trying to equate Soros with PoliticalChic?

Of course not...

But since YOU apparently want to discuss Nazis, I just thought you might like to add your comments about the Democrats' chief financier working with the Nazis to send Jews to the death camps (and admitting he ENJOYED doing it)!!!!

I've been through the anti-Soros propaganda.

This thread is about PoliticalChic agreeing with Hitler about socialists, democrats, and Marxists.

So in other words, you want to attack another poster with unfounded allegations instead of actually discussing Soros' Nazi connections...

Nice deflection...

But what else could we expect from the biggest liar and hypocrite on USMB????

 

[the_human_being]

 

[the_human_being]

 

[the_human_being]

 

[Arianrhod]

If it's "on sale," y'all might consider picking some up at the bargain price.

If, on the other hand, it were "for sale," that would be a different matter.

This poster has inadvertently proven exactly the point of the OP, and the indictment it levels at Democrats, Liberals and Progressives.


Thanks for dropping by.....I couldn't have done it without you.

Proven that you have no integrity? You didn't need my help for that.

 

[Timmy]

View attachment 59581

Checks? That's so 90's.

 

[Londoner]

Ronald Reagan - your greatest political hero - sold weapons to Iran, in direct violation of the Constitution. He should have been impeached.

Meanwhile there is no proof that Clinton mishandled classified information - only speculation. There have been no indictments, only speculation.

It wasn't speculation that the Reagan administration sold weapons illegally to the world's leading terrorist nation, and then used the proceeds to fund the terrorist Contras in Nicaragua. This was proven. And nobody in Political Chic's cut-&-paste universe has ever levied any criticism at this act.

The Republican voter, as a rule, never criticizes Republican presidents. The Republican voter overlooks wars created under false pretenses, yet somehow those same voters claim that the Left has no standards?

There is no proof (yet) that Clinton has committed an indictable offense. There is only the Rightwing scandal machine which throws out constant bullshit in hopes that something will stick. The only thing we know for certain is that the Rightwing voter will never hold his/her side to any moral or legal standards. This fact makes it hard to take the Clinton scandal mongers seriously.

[Of course privately I'm hoping Clinton goes down so that Bernie can emerge]

 

[initforme]

Once big money enters the equation, integrity is not possible. Secondly, this country has never been about integrity. Its about survival. Plain and simple. Its never been a shining city on a hill.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bill bangs a 21 year old . Not rape .

Trumps wife says he raped her.

Ron Reagan Iran contra mess= treason .

Why are u blaming soviet Russia on the dems!?

Are we going to play this silly game .?

1."Bill bangs a 21 year old . Not rape ."

Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:


2. "Why are u blaming soviet Russia on the dems!?"
Without the tireless efforts of Franklin Roosevelt, there wouldn't be a Soviet Russia....or at least one with the power to roil the world.

And...
"In his book, which came out this week, Kengor focuses on a KGB letter written at the height of the Cold War that shows that Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) offered to assist Soviet leaders in formulating a public relations strategy to counter President Reagan’s foreign policy and to complicate his re-election efforts.

The letter, dated May 14, 1983, was sent from the head of the KGB to Yuri Andropov, who was then General Secretary of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party.

In his letter, KGB head Viktor Chebrikov offered Andropov his interpretation of Kennedy’s offer. Former U.S. Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) had traveled to Moscow on behalf of Kennedy to seek out a partnership with Andropov and other Soviet officials, Kengor claims in his book."
風俗エトセトラ

Letter Details Kennedy Offer To USSR | Sweetness & Light


Traitorous Democrats....or is that redundant.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ronald Reagan - your greatest political hero - sold weapons to Iran, in direct violation of the Constitution. He should have been impeached.

Meanwhile there is no proof that Clinton mishandled classified information - only speculation. There have been no indictments, only speculation.

It wasn't speculation that the Reagan administration sold weapons illegally to the world's leading terrorist nation, and then used the proceeds to fund the terrorist Contras in Nicaragua. This was proven. And nobody in Political Chic's cut-&-paste universe has ever levied any criticism at this act.

The Republican voter, as a rule, never criticizes Republican presidents. The Republican voter overlooks wars created under false pretenses, yet somehow those same voters claim that the Left has no standards?

There is no proof (yet) that Clinton has committed an indictable offense. There is only the Rightwing scandal machine which throws out constant bullshit in hopes that something will stick. The only thing we know for certain is that the Rightwing voter will never hold his/her side to any moral or legal standards. This fact makes it hard to take the Clinton scandal mongers seriously.

[Of course privately I'm hoping Clinton goes down so that Bernie can emerge]

"Ronald Reagan - your greatest political hero - sold weapons to Iran, in direct violation of the Constitution. He should have been impeached."

Not true.

1. The Iran-Contra scandal involved the sale of arms to Iran, basically to ransom American hostages that Islamic extremists held, and diverting proceeds from the sale to the Contras in Nicaragua. Neither the sale nor the diversions of funds were clear violations of existing laws: subsequent independent counsel investigations directly charged anyone with crimes for either the arms sales nor the diversions.
2. "... reversal of NSC staff member Oliver North and National Security Adviser John Poindexter’s convictions. The Court of Appeals reversed their convictions because they successfully argued that witnesses in their trials might have been affected by publicized immunized congressional testimony, even though the prosecutors themselves had taken painstaking efforts to avoid encountering information about the hearings."

Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs - The Legal Aftermath (convictions: Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs - The Legal Aftermath)

[The parallel investigation by Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh secured criminal convictions of nearly a dozen senior administration officials and private citizens for acts such as perjury, conspiracy, fraud, and the destruction of evidence.
Read more:Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions]

1. 1. Two points should be made clear. The Democrat Congress was strongly in favor of the communists of Nicaragua, and the scandal was an attempt to tie the hands of the President, who was strongly anti-communist. And, two, congressional attempts to conduct foreign policy were, at the very least, constitutionally dubious. Reagan often complained [p. 222] that it was not possible to carry out foreign policy with 535 secretaries of state in Congress.
2. 1. The outcome of the constitutional struggle over the Iran-Contra matter would be decided in that exact way: by public judgment of the political clash in Washington. The joint House-Senate committee investigation of the Iran-Contra affair—an investigation Democrats likened to Watergate and hoped would end with Reagan’s impeachment—took a turn President Reagan’s critics had not expected when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North appeared and delivered a devastatingly effective attack on liberals in Congress for their irresponsible meddling in foreign policy. Public opinion decisively shifted in Reagan’s favor, and the liberal dream of driving another Republican president from office died quickly. In other words, the people judged, just as Locke said they should, and judged that Reagan had acted properly, if not necessarily wisely. The Unsolvable Problem of Executive Power

 

[PoliticalChic]

Once big money enters the equation, integrity is not possible. Secondly, this country has never been about integrity. Its about survival. Plain and simple. Its never been a shining city on a hill.

I just love your autobiographical posts.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

View attachment 59581

Checks? That's so 90's.

How did I know you would know that?

 

[Theowl32]

Liberals, without exception, are fucking worthless losers. Nothing but united puppets and pawns of their socialist gods. This thread proves it yet again.

 

[imawhosure]

How is it if the left is correct, that the United States consistently kicked Europe's basically Socialist European ass economically for over a century? Accident? Propaganda? We really didn't and are lying? And while doing it, we created the highest living standard the world had ever seen, for the largest swath of our people!

Now we have moved left since at least Clinton,(and yes, that includes during GW, which means the left should love him) and we fall back. Democrat solution? More European socialism!

All of the facts dispute their assertions, yet they come on the media, on here, there, and everywhere; and with a straight face, try and tell every American that they are brilliant, correct, and know better! It is more than disgusting, it is depressing, because to many uneducated people believe them, and the snake oil they peddle.

 

[Theowl32]

How is it if the left is correct, that the United States consistently kicked Europe's basically Socialist European ass economically for over a century? Accident? Propaganda? We really didn't and are lying? And while doing it, we created the highest living standard the world had ever seen, for the largest swath of our people!

Now we have moved left since at least Clinton,(and yes, that includes during GW, which means the left should love him) and we fall back. Democrat solution? More European socialism!

All of the facts dispute their assertions, yet they come on the media, on here, there, and everywhere; and with a straight face, try and tell every American that they are brilliant, correct, and know better! It is more than disgusting, it is depressing, because to many uneducated people believe them, and the snake oil they peddle.

All while none of them have ever lived under those conditions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How is it if the left is correct, that the United States consistently kicked Europe's basically Socialist European ass economically for over a century? Accident? Propaganda? We really didn't and are lying? And while doing it, we created the highest living standard the world had ever seen, for the largest swath of our people!

Now we have moved left since at least Clinton,(and yes, that includes during GW, which means the left should love him) and we fall back. Democrat solution? More European socialism!

All of the facts dispute their assertions, yet they come on the media, on here, there, and everywhere; and with a straight face, try and tell every American that they are brilliant, correct, and know better! It is more than disgusting, it is depressing, because to many uneducated people believe them, and the snake oil they peddle.

Yup...

And don't forget that we provide the armed forces to keep them safe.

1. A central theme of Leftism is pacifism, largely because no welfare state can afford a strong military. Europeans came to rely on America to fight the world’s evils and even to defend their countries. This means that ‘equality’ trumps morality.
   1. That is why Liberal elites are so confused: they venerate a Cuban tyranny with its egalitarian society over a free, decent, and prosperous America that has greater inequality of material wealth.
   2. The Right regards pacifism as an accessory to evil. Dennis Prager

 

[imawhosure]

How is it if the left is correct, that the United States consistently kicked Europe's basically Socialist European ass economically for over a century? Accident? Propaganda? We really didn't and are lying? And while doing it, we created the highest living standard the world had ever seen, for the largest swath of our people!

Now we have moved left since at least Clinton,(and yes, that includes during GW, which means the left should love him) and we fall back. Democrat solution? More European socialism!

All of the facts dispute their assertions, yet they come on the media, on here, there, and everywhere; and with a straight face, try and tell every American that they are brilliant, correct, and know better! It is more than disgusting, it is depressing, because to many uneducated people believe them, and the snake oil they peddle.

Yup...

And don't forget that we provide the armed forces to keep them safe.

1. A central theme of Leftism is pacifism, largely because no welfare state can afford a strong military. Europeans came to rely on America to fight the world’s evils and even to defend their countries. This means that ‘equality’ trumps morality.
   1. That is why Liberal elites are so confused: they venerate a Cuban tyranny with its egalitarian society over a free, decent, and prosperous America that has greater inequality of material wealth.
   2. The Right regards pacifism as an accessory to evil. Dennis Prager

That is 100% correct PC, but let us not look upon the Obama administration and the DNC to harshly on embracing the facists in Cuba. That one move by their brilliant leaders, has almost certainly delivered the gift of FLORIDA to the GOP in the upcoming election-) If the leftists shooting themselves in the foot is a good thing, then I proclaim they have done a GREAT thing with this utterly incompetent, political, move.......and I say, "thank you very much, Obama and DNC!"