Investigation Into 'Dossier' Snares Another Obama Alum

[The Purge]

If only our government was as interested in “right” as Judicial Watch is.

How does the State Dept get away with just not answering FOIA requests?

I know, I know....goes back to that two tiered system. :-(

Judicial Watch demands Victoria Nuland's communications on issue

Government watchdog Judicial Watch has filed dozens of FOIA requests and lawsuits over the “Steele dossier,” the dubious anti-Trump document funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Despite its “unverified” claims, as FBI Director James Comey described them, the Obama administration used it as evidence to obtain a warrant to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign.

Judicial Watch has demanded interviews with Hillary Clinton’s aides and access to communications involving most of the top level appointees who dealt with the issue.

Now, it’s Victoria Nuland’s turn.

The former assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs under Obama is believed to have been the one who turned the dossier over to the FBI.

Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the State Department for records of her communications with top Justice, FBI and State Department officials.

The lawsuit came after the State Department didn’t respond to a FOIA request.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

 

[Denizen]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

Suing for defamation as a sitting president is even too stupid for Trump to do.
It’s a horrible idea. A president has plenty to deal with. He doesn’t have to chase frivolous law suits. Put the bottle down, close the lid on the glue, and go sleep it off.

 

[WheelieAddict]

The desperation from Trump supporters is funny. Obama did it! Hillary did it! The guy I voted for isn't a total piece of shit is he?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

If only our government was as interested in “right” as Judicial Watch is.

How does the State Dept get away with just not answering FOIA requests?

I know, I know....goes back to that two tiered system. :-(

Judicial Watch demands Victoria Nuland's communications on issue

Government watchdog Judicial Watch has filed dozens of FOIA requests and lawsuits over the “Steele dossier,” the dubious anti-Trump document funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Despite its “unverified” claims, as FBI Director James Comey described them, the Obama administration used it as evidence to obtain a warrant to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign.

Judicial Watch has demanded interviews with Hillary Clinton’s aides and access to communications involving most of the top level appointees who dealt with the issue.

Now, it’s Victoria Nuland’s turn.

The former assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs under Obama is believed to have been the one who turned the dossier over to the FBI.

Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the State Department for records of her communications with top Justice, FBI and State Department officials.

The lawsuit came after the State Department didn’t respond to a FOIA request.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Remind me again what branch of government uncovered the goods in Watergate........oh, wait...it wasn’t any part of government. History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

Relying heavily upon anonymous sources, Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein uncovered information suggesting that knowledge of the break-in, and attempts to cover it up, led deeply into the upper reaches of the Justice Department, FBI, CIA, and the White House.

 

[Denizen]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

Suing for defamation as a sitting president is even too stupid for Trump to do.
It’s a horrible idea. A president has plenty to deal with. He doesn’t have to chase frivolous law suits. Put the bottle down, close the lid on the glue, and go sleep it off.

Donald Trump should take up alcohol guzzling or dope to give him an excuse for his erratic behavior.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

Suing for defamation as a sitting president is even too stupid for Trump to do.
It’s a horrible idea. A president has plenty to deal with. He doesn’t have to chase frivolous law suits. Put the bottle down, close the lid on the glue, and go sleep it off.

Donald Trump should take up alcohol guzzling or dope to give him an excuse for his erratic behavior.

Maybe, I mean it seems to work for you.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

When it comes to the whole rotten Russian collusion hoax? Of course he could win that case!

It's a clear cut case of high level Obama aligned officials manufacturing a smear campaign that tried to remove a legally elected president from office based on false and manufactured claims and evidence.

But it's nearly impossible for any public figure, let alone the president of the USA, to prove damage to himself and the
lawsuit would have to wait until he leaves office in four more years and who knows what developments might come out by then?

It wold be like opening up your own skull in a risky and complicated surgery to remove a benign cancer tumor. Is all the risk and trouble really worth it?

 

[Denizen]

If Trump had any case against people associated with the Steele dossier and believes the allegations are false, why doesn't he sue for defamation?

Could Trump win any legal case when he has a reputation for constant and frequent lying?

When it comes to the whole rotten Russian collusion hoax? Of course he could win that case!

It's a clear cut case of high level Obama aligned officials manufacturing a smear campaign that tried to remove a legally elected president from office based on false and manufactured claims and evidence.

But it's nearly impossible for any public figure, let alone the president of the USA, to prove damage to himself and the
lawsuit would have to wait until he leaves office in four more years and who knows what developments might come out by then?

It wold be like opening up your own skull in a risky and complicated surgery to remove a benign cancer tumor. Is all the risk and trouble really worth it?

Trump is such a complete liar his lawyers would not allow him to enter a witness box.

 

[Aletheia4u]