IPCC Issues Bleakest Warning Yet- Only Small Window Left to Save Planet

For the 30th straight year, the IPCC, with no real evidence of planetary warming, nor any that Co2 causes warming, warns again the planet is near doom...

WHY do we pay for this BULLSHIT???
 
Although the predictions are all over the lot, there is one consistent factor. In each and every case, the coming catastrophe demands much more government regulation and more pain in the immediate future FOR WORKING CLASS citizens, who will struggle to cope with inflation, rising energy costs, artificial food shortages, and brown-outs.

But the "elites" who make these predictions don't have to worry about silly things like that. They are above all of it.
 
DGS49 said:
Although the predictions are all over the lot, there is one consistent factor. In each and every case, the coming catastrophe demands much more government regulation and more pain in the immediate future FOR WORKING CLASS citizens, who will struggle to cope with inflation, rising energy costs, artificial food shortages, and brown-outs.

But the "elites" who make these predictions don't have to worry about silly things like that. They are above all of it.
Click to expand...
Would you care to spell out some specifics?
 
climate-global-warming-cooling.jpg

Fear Porn sells.
 
petro said:
They report the fear mongering narrative that the "experts" spew at the time.
Click to expand...
If you were to actually read the articles you would find an extremely limited number of generally unqualified sources for those stories. It was NOT reflected in peer reviewed publications.
 
Crick said:
If you were to actually read the articles you would find an extremely limited number of generally unqualified sources for those stories. It was NOT reflected in peer reviewed publications.
Click to expand...
You determined that decades old articles were unqualified in just four minutes?
Does your condemnation also apply to more recent articles that agree with your narrative?

I call bullshit.
 
petro said:
You determined that decades old articles were unqualified in just four minutes?
Does your condemnation also apply to more recent articles that agree with your narrative?

I call bullshit.
Click to expand...
This forum has been talking for years about 70s new ice age claims in mass media. This news is antique.
 
Crick said:
From Wikipedia's article on Dr Ball

Timothy Francis Ball (November 5, 1938 – September 24, 2022) was a British-born Canadian public speaker and writer who was a professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Winnipeg from 1971 until his retirement in 1996. Ball then became very active in promoting rejection of the scientific consensus on global warming, giving public talks and writing opinion pieces and letters to the editor for Canadian newspapers. He has been a member of energy industry funded lobbying groups.

Ball's expertise in chemistry and physics is ZERO. Ball is funded by the energy industry and has been for years. -- OP
Maurice Frederick Strong, PC, CC, OM, FRSC, FRAIC (April 29, 1929 – November 27, 2015) was a Canadian oil and mineral businessman and a diplomat who served as Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations.[4][5][6]

Strong had his start as an entrepreneur in the Alberta oil patch and was President of Power Corporation of Canada until 1966. In the early 1970s he was Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and then became the first executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme. He returned to Canada to become Chief Executive Officer of Petro-Canada from 1976 to 1978. He headed Ontario Hydro, one of North America's largest power utilities, was national president and chairman of the Extension Committee of the World Alliance of YMCAs, and headed American Water Development Incorporated. He served as a commissioner of the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1986[7] and was recognised by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as a leader in the international environmental movement.[8]

He was President of the Council of the University for Peace from 1998 to 2006. More recently Strong was an active honorary professor at Peking University and honorary chairman of its Environmental Foundation. He was chairman of the advisory board for the Institute for Research on Security and Sustainability for Northeast Asia.[9] He died at the age of 86 in 2015.[10]

Dewar, Elaine 1948- (Elaine Ruth Dewar)​

PERSONAL:​

Born June 18, 1948, in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; daughter of Sam (a physician) and Petty Sarah Landa; married Stephen Dewar, June 1, 1969; children: Anna Esther, Danielle Sarah Nicole. Education: Attended Nutana Collegiate and York University; University of Toronto, B.A., 1970. Religion: Jewish. Hobbies and other interests: Swimming, tennis, drawing, reading.

CAREER:​

Me and My Friends Gallery, founder, 1970-72; Maclean's, researcher, assistant editor, and associate editor, 1973-77; freelance journalist, editor, and story editor, 1977—; City Woman (magazine), contributing editor, 1978-82; Lorne Green's New Wilderness, writer and story editor, 1982-85; Toronto Life (magazine), contributing editor, 1984-94; Ryerson Polytechnical Institute, instructor in magazine journalism, 1985-86; Dewar Productions, Inc., director and vice president, 1988—; Writers to Reform Libel Law, cofounder, 1990—.

AWARDS, HONORS:​

York University Gold Medal for Outstanding Academic Achievement in English Literature, University of Toronto; A.C. Forrest Memorial Award; Mutual Life of Canada Award for business writing; Jackman Foundation Award for investigative journalism; University of Western Ontario President's Medal; Outdoor Writer's Association of America Two-Star Award; Foundation for the Advancement of Canadian Letters Author's Award; University of Kansas School of Journalism White Award for investigative journalism.

WRITINGS:​

Cloak of Green, J. Lorimer (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), 1995.

Bones: Discovering the First Americans, Random House Canada (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), 2001.

The Second Tree: Of Clones, Chimeras and Quests for Immortality, Carroll & Graf (New York, NY), 2004.

SIDELIGHTS:​

Elaine Dewar is a Canadian investigative journalist and nonfiction science writer. In Cloak of Green, she presents a study of the environmental movement in various places around the world. She states in her book that, like many other organizations, the environmental movement is connected to government agencies and businesses, and it works to promote and protect its own interests. Dewar also theorizes that environmental groups are linked in a conspiratorial effort to destroy nationalism and create a new world order, which the author calls the "Global Governance Agenda."


But it is one being significantly altered by human activities, hitting levels never seen by homo sapiens and not seen on Earth for well over a million years. Water vapor, being a precipitable component, will not be directly increased by human activity.

Volume proportion is not what determines the amount of energy trapped by a greenhouse gas. Water vapor retains more IR than does CO2 but it is not changing. The warming of the planet is being caused by human activity increasing the level of atmsopheric CO2 a gas with a lifetime measured in centuries. What water vapor, with a lifetime measured in days, does, is basically irrelevant. It is not responsible for the observed warming. It will not ameliorate the observed warming.

Methane is exceedingly potent as a greenhouse gas. Fortunately, its lifetime is only about 12 years and it is at much lower levels than CO2. Look at the table below and compare the proportion of greenhouse warming of each gas to their absolute levels in the atmosphere. Do you not see that arguments that try to tell you that CO2 and methane can't hurt us because their levels are so small are just bullshit attempting to take advantage of the general science ignorance of the audience they're targeting?

All of these gases are being created and emitted by human activities

This comment that that the range of a parameter makes the information useless has become a very popular denier meme. The truth is, it makes it obvious that the IPCC is being honest and accurate while you and Tim Ball and WUWT are not. Here is a larger excerpt from the Wikipedia article on "Greenhouse gas"

Impacts on the overall greenhouse effect​

Main article: Greenhouse effect
refer to caption and adjacent text

Schmidt et al. (2010)[28] analyzed how individual components of the atmosphere contribute to the total greenhouse effect. They estimated that water vapor accounts for about 50% of Earth's greenhouse effect, with clouds contributing 25%, carbon dioxide 20%, and the minor greenhouse gases and aerosols accounting for the remaining 5%. In the study, the reference model atmosphere is for 1980 conditions. Image credit: NASA.[29]
The contribution of each gas to the greenhouse effect is determined by the characteristics of that gas, its abundance, and any indirect effects it may cause. For example, the direct radiative effect of a mass of methane is about 84 times stronger than the same mass of carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame[30] but it is present in much smaller concentrations so that its total direct radiative effect has so far been smaller, in part due to its shorter atmospheric lifetime in the absence of additional carbon sequestration. On the other hand, in addition to its direct radiative impact, methane has a large, indirect radiative effect because it contributes to ozone formation. Shindell et al. (2005)[31] argues that the contribution to climate change from methane is at least double previous estimates as a result of this effect.[32]

When ranked by their direct contribution to the greenhouse effect, the most important are:[27]

notes:
(A) Water vapor strongly varies locally[34]
(B) The concentration in stratosphere. About 90% of the ozone in Earth's atmosphere is contained in the stratosphere.
CompoundFormulaConcentration in
atmosphere[33] (ppm)		Contribution
(%)
Water vapor and cloudsH
2O		10–50,000(A)36–72%
Carbon dioxideCO2~4009–26%
MethaneCH
4		~1.84–9%
OzoneO
3		2–8(B)3–7%
In addition to the main greenhouse gases listed above, other greenhouse gases include sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons (see IPCC list of greenhouse gases). Some greenhouse gases are not often listed. For example, nitrogen trifluoride has a high global warming potential (GWP) but is only present in very small quantities.[35]

References​

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b "IPCC AR4 SYR Appendix Glossary" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2018. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
  2. ^ "NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Greenhouse Gases: Refining the Role of Carbon Dioxide". www.giss.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 12 January 2005. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
  3. ^ Karl TR, Trenberth KE (2003). "Modern global climate change". Science. 302 (5651): 1719–23. Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1719K. doi:10.1126/science.1090228. PMID 14657489. S2CID 45484084. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  4. ^ Le Treut H.; Somerville R.; Cubasch U.; Ding Y.; Mauritzen C.; Mokssit A.; Peterson T.; Prather M. Historical overview of climate change science (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 14 December 2008. in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007)
  5. ^ "NASA Science Mission Directorate article on the water cycle". Nasascience.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 17 January 2009. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  6. ^ Eddie Schwieterman. "Comparing the Greenhouse Effect on Earth, Mars, Venus, and Titan: Present Day and through Time" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 January 2015.
  7. ^ Jump up to:a b "Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industrial levels". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 3 June 2022. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
  8. ^ "Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov". www.climate.gov. Archived from the original on 24 June 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2020.
  9. ^ "Frequently asked global change questions". Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Archived from the original on 17 August 2011. Retrieved 23 February 2010.
  10. ^ ESRL Web Team (14 January 2008). "Trends in carbon dioxide". Esrl.noaa.gov. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
  11. ^ "Analysis: When might the world exceed 1.5C and 2C of global warming?". Carbon Brief. 4 December 2020. Archived from the original on 6 June 2021. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  12. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch5 2021, Sec 5.2.1.1
  13. ^ "Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 30 December 2019. The burning of coal, natural gas, and oil for electricity and heat is the largest single source of global greenhouse gas emissions.
  14. ^ "AR4 SYR Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers – 2 Causes of change". ipcc.ch. Archived from the original on 28 February 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2015.
  15. ^ Höpfner, M.; Milz, M.; Buehler, S.; Orphall, J.; Stiller, G. (24 May 2012). "The natural greenhouse effect of atmospheric oxygen (O2) and nitrogen (N2)". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (L10706). Bibcode:2012GeoRL..3910706H. doi:10.1029/2012GL051409. ISSN 1944-8007. S2CID 128823108.
  16. ^ "Atmospheric Concentration of Greenhouse Gases" (PDF). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1 August 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 6 September 2021.
  17. ^ "Inside the Earth's invisible blanket". sequestration.org. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  18. ^ "FAQ 7.1". p. 14. in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007)
  19. ^ Canadell, J.G.; Le Quere, C.; Raupach, M.R.; Field, C.B.; Buitenhuis, E.T.; Ciais, P.; Conway, T.J.; Gillett, N.P.; Houghton, R.A.; Marland, G. (2007). "Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104 (47): 18866–70. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10418866C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702737104. PMC 2141868. PMID 17962418.
  20. ^ "The Chemistry of Earth's Atmosphere". Earth Observatory. NASA. Archived from the original on 20 September 2008.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b Forster, P.; et al. (2007). "2.10.3 Indirect GWPs". Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2012.
  22. ^ MacCarty, N. "Laboratory Comparison of the Global-Warming Potential of Six Categories of Biomass Cooking Stoves" (PDF). Approvecho Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 November 2013.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Water vapour: feedback or forcing?". RealClimate. 6 April 2005. Archived from the original on 24 June 2007. Retrieved 1 May 2006.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b Held, Isaac M.; Soden, Brian J. (November 2000). "Water vapor feedback and global warming". Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 25 (1): 441–475. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.22.9397. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441. ISSN 1056-3466.
  25. ^ Evans, Kimberly Masters (2005). "The greenhouse effect and climate change". The environment: a revolution in attitudes. Detroit: Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0787690823.
  26. ^ "Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2010". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 15 April 2012. p. 1.4. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b c Kiehl, J.T.; Kevin E. Trenberth (1997). "Earth's annual global mean energy budget". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 78 (2): 197–208. Bibcode:1997BAMS...78..197K. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2.
  28. ^ Schmidt, G.A.; R. Ruedy; R.L. Miller; A.A. Lacis (2010), "The attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect" (PDF), J. Geophys. Res., vol. 115, no. D20, pp. D20106, Bibcode:2010JGRD..11520106S, doi:10.1029/2010JD014287, archived from the original (PDF) on 22 October 2011, D20106. Web page Archived 4 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  29. ^ Lacis, A. (October 2010), NASA GISS: CO2: The Thermostat that Controls Earth's Temperature, New York: NASA GISS, archived from the original on 20 October 2010
  30. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g "Appendix 8.A" (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report. p. 731. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  31. ^ Shindell, Drew T. (2005). "An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone". Geophysical Research Letters. 32 (4): L04803. Bibcode:2005GeoRL..32.4803S. doi:10.1029/2004GL021900. S2CID 129022003. Archived from the original on 11 September 2005. Retrieved 3 September 2005.
  32. ^ "Methane's Impacts on Climate Change May Be Twice Previous Estimates". Nasa.gov. 30 November 2007. Archived from the original on 11 September 2005. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  33. ^ "Climate Change Indicators: Atmospheric Concentrations of Greenhouse Gases". Climate Change Indicators. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 27 June 2016. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  34. ^ Wallace, John M. and Peter V. Hobbs. Atmospheric Science; An Introductory Survey. Elsevier. Second Edition, 2006. ISBN 978-0127329512. Chapter 1
  35. ^ Prather, Michael J.; J Hsu (2008). "NF3, the greenhouse gas missing from Kyoto". Geophysical Research Letters. 35 (12): L12810. Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3512810P. doi:10.1029/2008GL034542. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
  36. ^ Isaksen, Ivar S.A.; Michael Gauss; Gunnar Myhre; Katey M. Walter Anthony; Carolyn Ruppel (20 April 2011). "Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions" (PDF). Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 25 (2): n/a. Bibcode:2011GBioC..25.2002I. doi:10.1029/2010GB003845. hdl:1912/4553. S2CID 17810925. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2011.
  37. ^ "AGU Water Vapor in the Climate System". Eso.org. 27 April 1995. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
  38. ^ Betts (2001). "6.3 Well-mixed Greenhouse Gases". Chapter 6 Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. Working Group I: The Scientific Basis IPCC Third Assessment Report – Climate Change 2001. UNEP/GRID-Arendal – Publications. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Jacob, Daniel (1999). Introduction to atmospheric chemistry. Princeton University Press. pp. 25–26. ISBN 978-0691001852. Archived from the original on 2 September 2011.
  40. ^ "How long will global warming last?". RealClimate. 15 March 2005. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC AR6 WG1 2021, Annex VII - Glossary
  42. ^ "Frequently Asked Question 10.3: If emissions of greenhouse gases are reduced, how quickly do their concentrations in the atmosphere decrease?". Global Climate Projections. Archived from the original on 24 December 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2011. in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007)
  43. ^ See also: Archer, David (2005). "Fate of fossil fuel CO2 in geologic time" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (C9): C09S05.1–6. Bibcode:2005JGRC..11009S05A. doi:10.1029/2004JC002625. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 December 2005. Retrieved 27 July 2007.
  44. ^ See also: Caldeira, Ken; Wickett, Michael E. (2005). "Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (C9): C09S04.1–12. Bibcode:2005JGRC..11009S04C. doi:10.1029/2004JC002671. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 August 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2007.
  45. ^ "Annual Greenhouse Gas Index". U.S. Global Change Research Program. Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  46. ^ Jump up to:a b Butler J. and Montzka S. (2020). "The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)". NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory/Earth System Research Laboratories. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b "Climate Change Indicators in the United States - Greenhouse Gases". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016. Archived from the original on 27 August 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2020..
  48. ^ "Climate Change Indicators: Greenhouse Gases". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  49. ^ "Climate Change Indicators in the United States - Climate Forcing". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016. Archived from the original on 27 August 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2020.[1] Archived 21 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine
  50. ^ LuAnn Dahlman (14 August 2020). "Climate change: annual greenhouse gas index". NOAA Climate.gov science news & Information for a climate smart nation. Archived from the original on 16 August 2013. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  51. ^ "The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI) - An Introduction". NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory/Earth System Research Laboratories. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch7 2021, Table 7.15
  53. ^ Chandler, David L. "How to count methane emissions". MIT News. Archived from the original on 16 January 2015. Retrieved 20 August 2018. Referenced paper is Trancik, Jessika; Edwards, Morgan (25 April 2014). "Climate impacts of energy technologies depend on emissions timing" (PDF). Nature Climate Change. 4 (5): 347. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4..347E. doi:10.1038/nclimate2204. hdl:1721.1/96138. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 January 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2015.
  54. ^ "Table 2.14" (PDF). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. p. 212. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2007. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
  55. ^ Vaara, Miska (2003), Use of ozone depleting substances in laboratories, TemaNord, p. 170, ISBN 978-9289308847, archived from the original on 6 August 2011
  56. ^ Montreal Protocol
  57. ^ Jump up to:a b Blasing (2013)
  58. ^ Jump up to:a b c Ehhalt, D.; et al., "Table 4.1", Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, archived from the original on 3 January 2013, in IPCC TAR WG1 (2001), pp. 244–45. Referred to by: Blasing (2013). Based on Blasing (2013): Pre-1750 concentrations of CH4,N2O and current concentrations of O3, are taken from Table 4.1 (a) of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001. Following the convention of IPCC (2001), inferred global-scale trace-gas concentrations from prior to 1750 are assumed to be practically uninfluenced by human activities such as increasingly specialized agriculture, land clearing, and combustion of fossil fuels. Preindustrial concentrations of industrially manufactured compounds are given as zero. The short atmospheric lifetime of ozone (hours-days) together with the spatial variability of its sources precludes a globally or vertically homogeneous distribution, so that a fractional unit such as parts per billion would not apply over a range of altitudes or geographical locations. Therefore a different unit is used to integrate the varying concentrations of ozone in the vertical dimension over a unit area, and the results can then be averaged globally. This unit is called a Dobson Unit (D.U.), after G.M.B. Dobson, one of the first investigators of atmospheric ozone. A Dobson unit is the amount of ozone in a column that, unmixed with the rest of the atmosphere, would be 10 micrometers thick at standard temperature and pressure.
  59. ^ Because atmospheric concentrations of most gases tend to vary systematically over the course of a year, figures given represent averages over a 12-month period for all gases except ozone (O3), for which a current global value has been estimated (IPCC, 2001, Table 4.1a). CO2 averages for year 2012 are taken from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, web site: www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends maintained by Dr. Pieter Tans. For other chemical species, the values given are averages for 2011. These data are found on the CDIAC AGAGE web site: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ndps/alegage.html Archived 21 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine or the AGAGE home page: http://agage.eas.gatech.edu Archived 7 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
  60. ^ Jump up to:a b Forster, P.; et al., "Table 2.1", Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, archived from the original on 12 October 2012, retrieved 30 October 2012, in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007), p. 141. Referred to by: Blasing (2013)
  61. ^ Prentice, I.C.; et al. "Executive summary". The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Archived from the original on 7 December 2009., in IPCC TAR WG1 (2001), p. 185. Referred to by: Blasing (2013)
  62. ^ "Carbon dioxide levels continue at record levels, despite COVID-19 lockdown". WMO.int. World Meteorological Organization. 23 November 2020. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020.
  63. ^ IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007), p. 140:"The simple formulae ... in Ramaswamy et al. (2001) are still valid. and give an RF of +3.7 W m–2 for a doubling in the CO2 mixing ratio. ... RF increases logarithmically with mixing ratio" Calculation: ln(new ppm/old ppm)/ln(2)*3.7
  64. ^ ppb = parts-per-billion
  65. ^ Jump up to:a b c d The first value in a cell represents Mace Head, Ireland, a mid-latitude Northern-Hemisphere site, while the second value represents Cape Grim, Tasmania, a mid-latitude Southern-Hemisphere site. "Current" values given for these gases are annual arithmetic averages based on monthly background concentrations for year 2011. The SF
    6 values are from the AGAGE gas chromatography – mass spectrometer (gc-ms) Medusa measuring system.
  66. ^ "Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE)". Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 30 October 2012. Data compiled from finer time scales in the Prinn; etc (2000). "ALE/GAGE/AGAGE database". Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
  67. ^ The pre-1750 value for N
    2O is consistent with ice-core records from 10,000 BCE through 1750 CE: "Summary for policymakers", Figure SPM.1, IPCC, archived from the original on 2 November 2018, retrieved 30 October 2012, in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007), p. 3. Referred to by: Blasing (2013)
  68. ^ Changes in stratospheric ozone have resulted in a decrease in radiative forcing of 0.05 W/m2: Forster, P.; et al., "Table 2.12", Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, archived from the original on 28 January 2013, retrieved 30 October 2012, in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007), p. 204. Referred to by: Blasing (2013)
  69. ^ "SF
    6 data from January 2004"    . Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2013.
  70. ^ "Data from 1995 through 2004". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Halogenated and other Atmospheric Trace Species (HATS).
  71. ^ Sturges, W.T.; et al. "Concentrations of SF
    6 from 1970 through 1999, obtained from Antarctic firn (consolidated deep snow) air samples"    . Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2013.
  72. ^ File:phanerozoic Carbon Dioxide.png
  73. ^ Berner, Robert A. (January 1994). "GEOCARB II: a revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time". American Journal of Science. 294 (1): 56–91. Bibcode:1994AmJS..294...56B. doi:10.2475/ajs.294.1.56.
  74. ^ Royer, D.L.; R.A. Berner; D.J. Beerling (2001). "Phanerozoic atmospheric CO2 change: evaluating geochemical and paleobiological approaches". Earth-Science Reviews. 54 (4): 349–92. Bibcode:2001ESRv...54..349R. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00042-8.
  75. ^ Berner, Robert A.; Kothavala, Zavareth (2001). "GEOCARB III: a revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time" (PDF). American Journal of Science. 301 (2): 182–204. Bibcode:2001AmJS..301..182B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.393.582. doi:10.2475/ajs.301.2.182. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 April 2006.
  76. ^ Beerling, D.J.; Berner, R.A. (2005). "Feedbacks and the co-evolution of plants and atmospheric CO2". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102 (5): 1302–05. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.1302B. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408724102. PMC 547859. PMID 15668402.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b Hoffmann, PF; AJ Kaufman; GP Halverson; DP Schrag (1998). "A neoproterozoic snowball earth". Science. 281 (5381): 1342–46. Bibcode:1998Sci...281.1342H. doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1342. PMID 9721097. S2CID 13046760.
  78. ^ Siegel, Ethan. "How Much CO2 Does A Single Volcano Emit?". Forbes. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 6 September 2018.
  79. ^ Gerlach, TM (1991). "Present-day CO2 emissions from volcanoes". Transactions of the American Geophysical Union. 72 (23): 249–55. Bibcode:1991EOSTr..72..249.. doi:10.1029/90EO10192.
  80. ^ See also: "U.S. Geological Survey". 14 June 2011. Archived from the original on 25 September 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  81. ^ Flückiger, Jacqueline (2002). "High-resolution Holocene N
    2O ice core record and its relationship with CH
    4 and CO2"    . Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 16 (1): 1010. Bibcode:2002GBioC..16.1010F. doi:10.1029/2001GB001417.
  82. ^ Friederike Wagner; Bent Aaby; Henk Visscher (2002). "Rapid atmospheric CO2 changes associated with the 8,200-years-B.P. cooling event". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99 (19): 12011–14. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9912011W. doi:10.1073/pnas.182420699. PMC 129389. PMID 12202744.
  83. ^ Andreas Indermühle; Bernhard Stauffer; Thomas F. Stocker (1999). "Early Holocene Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations". Science. 286 (5446): 1815. doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1815a. IndermÜhle, A (1999). "Early Holocene atmospheric CO2concentrations". Science. 286 (5446): 1815a–15. doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1815a.
  84. ^ H. J. Smith; M. Wahlen; D. Mastroianni (1997). "The CO2 concentration of air trapped in GISP2 ice from the Last Glacial Maximum-Holocene transition". Geophysical Research Letters. 24 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1997GeoRL..24....1S. doi:10.1029/96GL03700. S2CID 129667062.
  85. ^ Charles J. Kibert (2016). "Background". Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. Wiley. ISBN 978-1119055327.
  86. ^ "Full Mauna Loa CO2 record". Earth System Research Laboratory. 2005. Archived from the original on 28 April 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
  87. ^ Tans, Pieter (3 May 2008). "Annual CO2 mole fraction increase (ppm) for 1959–2007". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division. "additional details". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 15 May 2008.; see also Masarie, K.A.; Tans, P.P. (1995). "Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record". J. Geophys. Res. 100 (D6): 11593–610. Bibcode:1995JGR...10011593M. doi:10.1029/95JD00859. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  88. ^ "Historical Overview of Climate Change Science – FAQ 1.3 Figure 1" (PDF). p. 116. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2008. in IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007)
  89. ^ "Chapter 3, IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, 2000" (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2000. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  90. ^ Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Uses Ch7 from "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change". www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  91. ^ "Global Carbon Project (GCP)". www.globalcarbonproject.org. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
  92. ^ Dumitru-Romulus Târziu; Victor-Dan Păcurar (January 2011). "Pădurea, climatul și energia". Rev. pădur. (in Romanian). 126 (1): 34–39. ISSN 1583-7890. 16720. Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2012.(webpage has a translation button)
  93. ^ "Sixth Assessment Report". www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 18 December 2021.
  94. ^ Evans, Simon (5 October 2021). "Analysis: Which countries are historically responsible for climate change? / Historical responsibility for climate change is at the heart of debates over climate justice". CarbonBrief.org. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from the Global Carbon Project, CDIAC, Our World in Data, Carbon Monitor, Houghton and Nassikas (2017) and Hansis et al (2015).
  95. ^ Fox, Alex. "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 22 June 2021.
  96. ^ "The present carbon cycle – Climate Change". Grida.no. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  97. ^ "Climate Change: Causation Archives". EarthCharts. Retrieved 22 June 2021.
  98. ^ "It's critical to tackle coal emissions – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b "Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty". The Royal Society. 2009. Archived from the original on 7 September 2009. Retrieved 12 September 2009.
  100. ^ Fischer, B.S.; Nakicenovic, N.; Alfsen, K.; Morlot, J. Corfee; de la Chesnaye, F.; Hourcade, J.-Ch.; Jiang, K.; Kainuma, M.; La Rovere, E.; Matysek, A.; Rana, A.; Riahi, K.; Richels, R.; Rose, S.; van Vuuren, D.; Warren, R., Issues related to mitigation in the long term context (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2018, retrieved 13 September 2009 in Rogner et al. (2007)
  101. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). "On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground" (PDF). The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  102. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1897). "On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air Upon the Temperature of the Ground". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 9 (54): 14. Bibcode:1897PASP....9...14A. doi:10.1086/121158.
  103. ^ Cook, J.; Nuccitelli, D.; Green, S.A.; Richardson, M.; Winkler, B.R.; Painting, R.; Way, R.; Jacobs, P.; Skuce, A. (2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
Click to expand...
7e5ia0.jpg
iu


None of this really, refutes the point, that, the IPCC is a globalist political body, and not a true, "scientific," body. You somehow, believe, that arguing the sources of evidence, is a substitution for ideas, it is not. All research institutions can be paid off by the same powers that are in charge of the political goals of the IPCC.

Only studies that engage in, and study supposed, human caused CO2 affects, will be studied, and considered at the IPCC, because there is a bureaucratic global agenda, it is baked into the agenda at the UN and at the IPCC, this is what you did not address. This is the reason why the models and predictions at the COP meetings and IPCC reports, are always, and forever, continually wrong.

. . . which is the subject of the thread.
 
Crick said:
This forum has been talking for years about 70s new ice age claims in mass media. This news is antique.
Click to expand...
Based upon the trend of historical empirical climate data from the geologic record, the odds of another glacial cycle occurring before the planet transitions from an ice age to a greenhouse planet are high. The earth is uniquely configured for colder temperatures because the polar regions are thermally isolated.

F2.large.jpg


crick is a dummy.jpg
 
Weatherman2020 said:
Hilarious.

Our 4,684th we must act now or all is lost warning in the last 50 years.

Meanwhile in the real world.

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions​


cei.org

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and...
cei.org cei.org
Click to expand...
They've been doing a great job. :rolleyes:

68-models-vs-obs-1979-2021-oceans-Fig01-550x413.jpg


 
Weatherman2020 said:
Hilarious.

Our 4,684th we must act now or all is lost warning in the last 50 years.

Meanwhile in the real world.

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions​


cei.org

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and...
cei.org cei.org
Click to expand...
Even worse! This window is far tinier than the last one!
 
Crick said:
Are you unfamiliar with Spencer's mistreatment of model data?
Click to expand...
I will take that as a yes.

From Roy Spencer
June 13, 2016

Roy Spencer was among individuals listed as creditors in Peabody Energy’s 2016 bankruptcy filings, reports the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD/PRWatch). [17]

While the available bankruptcy documents do not list the scale or dates of funding, they outline Peabody Energy’s financial ties to a large network of groups promoting climate change denial. [18]

Other individuals appearing in the documents include climate deniers Willie Soon, Richard Lindzen, and Richard Berman. The long list of organizations also includes groups such as Americans for Prosperity, American Legislative Exchange Council, CFACT, Institute for Energy Research, State Policy Network, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and dozens more. [19]

The Guardian also analysed and reported on the Peabody bankruptcy findings: [20]

“These groups collectively are the heart and soul of climate denial,” said Kert Davies, founder of the Climate Investigation Center, who has spent 20 years tracking funding for climate denial. “It’s the broadest list I have seen of one company funding so many nodes in the denial machine.”
The company’s filings reveal funding for a range of organisations which have fought Barack Obama’s plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and denied the very existence of climate change. […]
Among Peabody’s beneficiaries, the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has insisted – wrongly – that carbon emissions are not a threat but “the elixir of life” while the American Legislative Exchange Council is trying to overturn Environmental Protection Agency rules cutting emissions from power plants. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity campaigns against carbon pricing. The Oklahoma chapter was on the list. […]
“The breadth of the groups with financial ties to Peabody is extraordinary. Thinktanks, litigation groups, climate scientists, political organisations, dozens of organisations blocking action on climate all receiving funding from the coal industry,” said Nick Surgey, director of research for the Center for Media and Democracy.
“We expected to see some denial money, but it looks like Peabody is the treasury for a very substantial part of the climate denial movement.” [20]
Click to expand...
Notable organizations also listed as creditors in the bankruptcy documents include:

July 2011

In July 2011, a paper co-authored by Spencer was published in the journal Remote Sensing, “[which is] a fine [peer-reviewed] journal for geographers, but it does not deal with atmospheric and climate science,” RealClimate found. [52]

His paper looked at a potential connection between clouds and global warming. The paper received significant media attention, and climate change skeptics claimed that it “blow a gaping hole in global warming alarmism.” [53]

Within three days of the publication of Spencer & Braswell’s paper, two climate scientists (Kevin Trenberth & John Fasullo) repeated the analysis and showed that the IPCC models are in agreement with the observations, so refuting Spencer’s claims. [52]

In Andrew Dessler’s view, “[This] paper is not really intended for other scientists, since they do not take Roy Spencer seriously anymore (he’s been wrong too many times). Rather, he’s writing his papers for Fox News, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, Congressional staffers, and the blogs. These are his audience and the people for whom this research is actually useful — in stopping policies to reduce GHG emissions — which is what Roy wants.” [54]

In response to the flawed peer review that allowed the publication of the paper, the Editor-in-Chief of Remote Sensing stepped down. He had this to say: (PDF) [55]

“After having become aware of the situation, and studying the various pro and contra arguments, I agree with the critics of the paper. Therefore, I would like to take the responsibility for this editorial decision and, as a result, step down as Editor-in-Chief of the journal Remote Sensing.

With this step I would also like to personally protest against how the authors and like-minded climate sceptics have much exaggerated the paper’s conclusions in public statements. . .” [55]

August 2005

According to an August 12, 2005 New York Times article, Spencer, along with another well-known “skeptic,” John Christy, admitted they made a mistake in their satellite data research that they said demonstrated a cooling in the troposphere (the earth’s lowest layer of atmosphere). It turned out that the exact opposite was occurring and the troposphere was getting warmer. [66]

“These papers should lay to rest once and for all the claims by John Christy and other global warming skeptics that a disagreement between tropospheric and surface temperature trends means that there are problems with surface temperature records or with climate models,” said Alan Robock, a meteorologist at Rutgers University. [66]
Click to expand...

From an Analysis of Roy Spencer's"Hillary Clinton Boards the Climate Crisis Train to Nowhere"​

​

REVIEWERS’ OVERALL FEEDBACK​

These comments are the overall opinion of scientists on the article, they are substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the analysis in the annotations on the article.
Kerry Emanuel, Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT:
The article is inaccurate in several places and conveys that one must choose between solving immediate problems, such as poverty, and long-term risks such as climate change. We can do both, and indeed must do both if we take poverty seriously, since climate change disproportionately affects the poor.
Jim Kossin, Research Scientist, NOAA's Center for Weather and Climate:
The author makes a number of statements that are not supported by the science or by established scientific process. He is basically playing by a different set of rules than the scientific community at large, which allows him to say anything he wants in order to make his case. A number of statements are misleading and some are obfuscating, particularly in terms of potential impacts of climate change on humans.
Victor Venema, Scientist, University of Bonn, Germany:
This article by Roy Spencer is misleading when it comes to his own work on tropospheric temperature changes and several times severely wrong outside of his expertise. It does not give a fair overview of the state of the science.
Peter Gleick, President Emeritus and Chief Scientist, Pacific Institute:
Almost every claim in this article is scientifically inaccurate or misleading.
Alexis Berg, Associate Research Scholar, Princeton University:
This articles uses a number of misleading statements, logical flaws and unsubstantiated claims to try to defend the erroneous idea that climate change is nothing to worry about, that there is nothing to do about it anyway, and that wanting to address it is all a power play by politicians.
Benjamin Horton, Professor, Rutgers University:
The discussion on sea level rise is misleading.
 
Crick said:
I will take that as a yes.
Click to expand...
Can you provide a comparison of CMIP6 model predictions and observations that shows something different than this?

Because if you can't then you haven't proven that their models are accurate.

68-models-vs-obs-1979-2021-oceans-Fig01-550x413.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Gone fishing for photographic fish... Oceanic endangerment and waste thrown from ships and barges.

< Previous Thread

A detailed view on what ignorance will cost the human race

Next Thread >

Similar threads

marvin martian
China increases coal mining while Biden hamstrings American economy
2
Replies
28
Views
376
BlindBoo
BlindBoo
Weatherman2020
Dave Barry’s 2023 Year in Review: Yes, the situation is hopeless
Replies
14
Views
2K
August West
A
PoliticalChic
Could This Be Number 42????
4 5 6
Replies
102
Views
3K
Cardinal Carminative
C
PoliticalChic
Strike #42!!!!
2 3
Replies
57
Views
3K
PoliticalChic
PoliticalChic
ChemEngineer
My Three Global Warming Fraud Websites
20 21 22
Replies
426
Views
16K
Crick
Crick

Latest Discussions

ActionJackson
Words That Start With "S"
62 63 64
Replies
1K
Views
16K
QuickHitCurepon
QuickHitCurepon
rightwinger
Republican Agenda 2024
3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
390
rightwinger
rightwinger
M
Kamala's Extramarital Affair Turns Trump Liability into a Trump Advantage
10 11 12
Replies
228
Views
877
Chillicothe
C
forkintheroad7
Zone1 JD Vance chose Catholicism.. why?
Replies
17
Views
99
forkintheroad7
forkintheroad7
DigitalDrifter
Kamalla Harris 2019 presidential candidate: "There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking," How will this go over in Pennsylvania today?
Replies
15
Views
40
OldFlame
OldFlame
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top