Iraq 10 Years Later: The Deadly Consequences of Spin

In 2012, European researchers visited a scrap metal site in Al Zubayr, an area near Basrah in southern Iraq. A local police officer told them that the site had at one time held military scrap metal from the bloody battles waged during the American invasion. A local guard told the researchers that children had been seen playing on the scrap during that time, and both adults and children had worked disassembling the military leftovers. At one point, the guard said, members of an international organization with equipment and white suits showed up, told guards that the site was very dangerous and "quickly ran off."

The researchers, working with the Dutch peace group IKV Pax Christi, with funding from the Norwegian government, visited areas in Iraq where depleted uranium contamination had been reported by Iraqis and international observers. Depleted uranium is a chemically toxic and radioactive heavy metal produced as a waste product of the nuclear power industry. Depleted uranium was used in armor-piercing munitions fired by US and Coalition forces during both the 2003 invasion and the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq.

There are between 300 and 365 sites where depleted uranium contamination was identified by Iraqi authorities the years following the 2003 US invasion, with an estimated cleanup cost of $30 million to $45 million, according to a report recently released by IKV Pax Christi. Iraqi authorities are currently cleaning up the sites, mostly located in the Basrah region, and 30 to 35 sites still need to be decontaminated.

The health impacts of depleted uranium have been subject to international debate since the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq, and the US and British governments have disputed allegations that their weapons have poisoned soldiers and civilians and caused increased rates of cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium is 40 percent less radioactive than uranium in its natural form, but the heavy metal is toxic and can potentially cause kidney damage, according to the US Department of Defense.

Doctors and researchers have reported increased rates of cancer and birth defects in areas where coalition forces used depleted uranium, but a lack of data and long-term studies in contaminated areas make it difficult to determine if depleted uranium contributed to the uptick in health problems along with other environmental and war-related factors, according to the report.

Sensationalist reports on the impacts of depleted uranium, along with a general distrust of both foreign and domestic authorities, have stoked continued anxiety among civilians about the potential dangers of contamination, the report states.

Research conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from 2006 to 2007 in four areas in Iraq determined that radioactivity from depleted uranium did not pose a significant health risk to civilians who might encounter residues or inhale airborne radioactive dusts, but the IAEA warned that civilians could be exposed to higher doses if they enter vehicles destroyed by depleted uranium munitions.

The IAEA has recommended that contaminated military equipment not be reprocessed as scrap and instead be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste.

The report also warns that scrap metal dealers are spreading contamination, and poor oversight has allowed children and other civilians access to contaminated areas and equipment with little or no information about the potential dangers of exposure.

The report documents evidence that depleted uranium munitions were fired on light vehicles, buildings and other civilian infrastructure, including the Iraqi Ministry of Planning in Baghdad.

"The use of depleted uranium in populated areas is alarming," the report states, casting doubt on previous assurances by coalition forces that depleted uranium would only be used on targeted armored vehicles, a major justification for using the heavy metal during the war.

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has estimated that 1,000 to 2,000 metric tons of depleted uranium was fired during the 2003 war in Iraq.

The extent of the depleted uranium contamination remains unclear, however, and the report blames a lack of transparency on behalf of coalition and US forces on the use of depleted uranium during the invasion. There is an absence of data and "crucial information" on the amount and types of depleted uranium weapons used, their targets, and the remediation efforts undertaken shortly after the war by the provisional government, making it difficult for international aid organizations and Iraqi authorities to assess and manage contamination with the ultimate goal of reducing harm to civilians.

Depleted Uranium Contamination is Still Spreading in Iraq
 
Most never knew this part of the story, because this Corporate Owned Media doesn't want you to know the whole truth. War is hell and we used weapons of mass destruction, if truth is to be told.
 
Tomas Young, Dying Iraq War Veteran, Pens 'Last Letter' To Bush, Cheney On War's 10th Anniversary

Days after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, Tomas Young, then a 22-year-old from Kansas City, Mo., made a decision repeated by many other Americans around the country: He was going to enlist in the military in hopes of getting even with the enemies who had helped coordinate the deaths of nearly 3,000 men, women and children.

Less than three years later, Young's Army service placed him not in Afghanistan -- where then-President George W. Bush had told the nation the terrorist plot had originated -- but in Iraq. On April 4, 2004, just five days into his first tour, Young's convoy was attacked by insurgents. A bullet from an AK-47 severed his spine. Another struck his knee. Young would never walk again, and in fact, for the next nearly nine years, he would suffer a number of medical setbacks that allowed him to survive only with the help of extensive medical procedures and the care of his wife, Claudia.

The incident turned Young into one of the most vocal veteran critics of the Iraq War. He has, however, saved his most powerful criticism for what he claims will be his last. Young says he'll die soon, but not before writing a letter to Bush and former Vice President Cheney on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War.

From Young's letter, published on TruthDig:

I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done. You may evade justice but in our eyes you are each guilty of egregious war crimes, of plunder and, finally, of murder, including the murder of thousands of young Americans—my fellow veterans—whose future you stole.

Young goes on to attack the "cowardice" of Bush and Cheney for avoiding military service themselves, and to encourage them to "stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness."

Tomas Young, Dying Iraq War Veteran, Pens 'Last Letter' To Bush, Cheney On War's 10th Anniversary
 


Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
Program development ... ·
Iran–Iraq War ·
The 1991 Persian Gulf War

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were ... were used extensively against Iran during ... uprisings against Kurds in 1991. Chemical weapons were ...

800px-WMD_world_map.svg.png
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKGvORyEGHA]Rumsfeld caught in another lie about WMD - YouTube[/ame]
 
In 2012, European researchers visited a scrap metal site in Al Zubayr, an area near Basrah in southern Iraq. A local police officer told them that the site had at one time held military scrap metal from the bloody battles waged during the American invasion. A local guard told the researchers that children had been seen playing on the scrap during that time, and both adults and children had worked disassembling the military leftovers. At one point, the guard said, members of an international organization with equipment and white suits showed up, told guards that the site was very dangerous and "quickly ran off."

The researchers, working with the Dutch peace group IKV Pax Christi, with funding from the Norwegian government, visited areas in Iraq where depleted uranium contamination had been reported by Iraqis and international observers. Depleted uranium is a chemically toxic and radioactive heavy metal produced as a waste product of the nuclear power industry. Depleted uranium was used in armor-piercing munitions fired by US and Coalition forces during both the 2003 invasion and the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq.

There are between 300 and 365 sites where depleted uranium contamination was identified by Iraqi authorities the years following the 2003 US invasion, with an estimated cleanup cost of $30 million to $45 million, according to a report recently released by IKV Pax Christi. Iraqi authorities are currently cleaning up the sites, mostly located in the Basrah region, and 30 to 35 sites still need to be decontaminated.

The health impacts of depleted uranium have been subject to international debate since the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq, and the US and British governments have disputed allegations that their weapons have poisoned soldiers and civilians and caused increased rates of cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium is 40 percent less radioactive than uranium in its natural form, but the heavy metal is toxic and can potentially cause kidney damage, according to the US Department of Defense.

Doctors and researchers have reported increased rates of cancer and birth defects in areas where coalition forces used depleted uranium, but a lack of data and long-term studies in contaminated areas make it difficult to determine if depleted uranium contributed to the uptick in health problems along with other environmental and war-related factors, according to the report.

Sensationalist reports on the impacts of depleted uranium, along with a general distrust of both foreign and domestic authorities, have stoked continued anxiety among civilians about the potential dangers of contamination, the report states.

Research conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from 2006 to 2007 in four areas in Iraq determined that radioactivity from depleted uranium did not pose a significant health risk to civilians who might encounter residues or inhale airborne radioactive dusts, but the IAEA warned that civilians could be exposed to higher doses if they enter vehicles destroyed by depleted uranium munitions.

The IAEA has recommended that contaminated military equipment not be reprocessed as scrap and instead be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste.

The report also warns that scrap metal dealers are spreading contamination, and poor oversight has allowed children and other civilians access to contaminated areas and equipment with little or no information about the potential dangers of exposure.

The report documents evidence that depleted uranium munitions were fired on light vehicles, buildings and other civilian infrastructure, including the Iraqi Ministry of Planning in Baghdad.

"The use of depleted uranium in populated areas is alarming," the report states, casting doubt on previous assurances by coalition forces that depleted uranium would only be used on targeted armored vehicles, a major justification for using the heavy metal during the war.

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has estimated that 1,000 to 2,000 metric tons of depleted uranium was fired during the 2003 war in Iraq.

The extent of the depleted uranium contamination remains unclear, however, and the report blames a lack of transparency on behalf of coalition and US forces on the use of depleted uranium during the invasion. There is an absence of data and "crucial information" on the amount and types of depleted uranium weapons used, their targets, and the remediation efforts undertaken shortly after the war by the provisional government, making it difficult for international aid organizations and Iraqi authorities to assess and manage contamination with the ultimate goal of reducing harm to civilians.

Depleted Uranium Contamination is Still Spreading in Iraq

Are you really using Truth-Out as a source?

Jason Leopold and Marc Ash | Indictment Still Sealed, Fitzgerald Still Busy

Sealed vs. Sealed

Daily Kos: Truthout is dead to me.(poll)
 


Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
Program development ... ·
Iran–Iraq War ·
The 1991 Persian Gulf War

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were ... were used extensively against Iran during ... uprisings against Kurds in 1991. Chemical weapons were ...

800px-WMD_world_map.svg.png

Besides being there myself personally, I think you forgot the rest of the story:

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe this article might put history into perspective:

There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq | World news | The Guardian

Leading To War :: a film that chronicles the path to war in Iraq

Why invading Iraq was a terrible mistake - CNN.com
 


Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
Program development ... ·
Iran–Iraq War ·
The 1991 Persian Gulf War

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were ... were used extensively against Iran during ... uprisings against Kurds in 1991. Chemical weapons were ...

800px-WMD_world_map.svg.png

Yes and the Reagan administration took an official no comment stance. No condemnation of Iraq for using WMD's.
 
In 2012, European researchers visited a scrap metal site in Al Zubayr, an area near Basrah in southern Iraq. A local police officer told them that the site had at one time held military scrap metal from the bloody battles waged during the American invasion. A local guard told the researchers that children had been seen playing on the scrap during that time, and both adults and children had worked disassembling the military leftovers. At one point, the guard said, members of an international organization with equipment and white suits showed up, told guards that the site was very dangerous and "quickly ran off."

The researchers, working with the Dutch peace group IKV Pax Christi, with funding from the Norwegian government, visited areas in Iraq where depleted uranium contamination had been reported by Iraqis and international observers. Depleted uranium is a chemically toxic and radioactive heavy metal produced as a waste product of the nuclear power industry. Depleted uranium was used in armor-piercing munitions fired by US and Coalition forces during both the 2003 invasion and the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq.

There are between 300 and 365 sites where depleted uranium contamination was identified by Iraqi authorities the years following the 2003 US invasion, with an estimated cleanup cost of $30 million to $45 million, according to a report recently released by IKV Pax Christi. Iraqi authorities are currently cleaning up the sites, mostly located in the Basrah region, and 30 to 35 sites still need to be decontaminated.

The health impacts of depleted uranium have been subject to international debate since the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq, and the US and British governments have disputed allegations that their weapons have poisoned soldiers and civilians and caused increased rates of cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium is 40 percent less radioactive than uranium in its natural form, but the heavy metal is toxic and can potentially cause kidney damage, according to the US Department of Defense.

Doctors and researchers have reported increased rates of cancer and birth defects in areas where coalition forces used depleted uranium, but a lack of data and long-term studies in contaminated areas make it difficult to determine if depleted uranium contributed to the uptick in health problems along with other environmental and war-related factors, according to the report.

Sensationalist reports on the impacts of depleted uranium, along with a general distrust of both foreign and domestic authorities, have stoked continued anxiety among civilians about the potential dangers of contamination, the report states.

Research conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from 2006 to 2007 in four areas in Iraq determined that radioactivity from depleted uranium did not pose a significant health risk to civilians who might encounter residues or inhale airborne radioactive dusts, but the IAEA warned that civilians could be exposed to higher doses if they enter vehicles destroyed by depleted uranium munitions.

The IAEA has recommended that contaminated military equipment not be reprocessed as scrap and instead be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste.

The report also warns that scrap metal dealers are spreading contamination, and poor oversight has allowed children and other civilians access to contaminated areas and equipment with little or no information about the potential dangers of exposure.

The report documents evidence that depleted uranium munitions were fired on light vehicles, buildings and other civilian infrastructure, including the Iraqi Ministry of Planning in Baghdad.

"The use of depleted uranium in populated areas is alarming," the report states, casting doubt on previous assurances by coalition forces that depleted uranium would only be used on targeted armored vehicles, a major justification for using the heavy metal during the war.

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has estimated that 1,000 to 2,000 metric tons of depleted uranium was fired during the 2003 war in Iraq.

The extent of the depleted uranium contamination remains unclear, however, and the report blames a lack of transparency on behalf of coalition and US forces on the use of depleted uranium during the invasion. There is an absence of data and "crucial information" on the amount and types of depleted uranium weapons used, their targets, and the remediation efforts undertaken shortly after the war by the provisional government, making it difficult for international aid organizations and Iraqi authorities to assess and manage contamination with the ultimate goal of reducing harm to civilians.

Depleted Uranium Contamination is Still Spreading in Iraq

Are you really using Truth-Out as a source?

Jason Leopold and Marc Ash | Indictment Still Sealed, Fitzgerald Still Busy

Sealed vs. Sealed

Daily Kos: Truthout is dead to me.(poll)

Besides criticizing the source, as most of your knuckle draggers do when you don't like truth.
Are you trying to tell me that this is a LIE?

We didn't use tons of depleted uranium during the 2003 war in Iraq?

The Iraqi people are still suffering from the effects?

What exactly do you have a problem with then, besides the source? If that's all, then maybe I can enlighten you with other sources:

The U.S. war machine unleashed in Iraq | SocialistWorker.org

Iraq's depleted uranium clean-up to cost $30m as contamination spreads | Environment | guardian.co.uk

PressTV - Iraq DU clean-up to cost USD 30mn: Report

Iraq War: An Affront to Nuremberg | Consortiumnews

Killing is Winning » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Gulf War veteran says exposure to depleted uranium led to cancer | This is Nottingham
 


Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
Program development ... ·
Iran–Iraq War ·
The 1991 Persian Gulf War

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were ... were used extensively against Iran during ... uprisings against Kurds in 1991. Chemical weapons were ...

800px-WMD_world_map.svg.png

Yes and the Reagan administration took an official no comment stance. No condemnation of Iraq for using WMD's.

How could he, when he was arming the Iranians, now today's chicken hawks want to start a war with them. Start a war with N. Korea or better yet help the Syrian rebels, which either side isn't too friendly with the U.S., so then we find ourselves stuck in there for another decade.
 
In 2012, European researchers visited a scrap metal site in Al Zubayr, an area near Basrah in southern Iraq. A local police officer told them that the site had at one time held military scrap metal from the bloody battles waged during the American invasion. A local guard told the researchers that children had been seen playing on the scrap during that time, and both adults and children had worked disassembling the military leftovers. At one point, the guard said, members of an international organization with equipment and white suits showed up, told guards that the site was very dangerous and "quickly ran off."

The researchers, working with the Dutch peace group IKV Pax Christi, with funding from the Norwegian government, visited areas in Iraq where depleted uranium contamination had been reported by Iraqis and international observers. Depleted uranium is a chemically toxic and radioactive heavy metal produced as a waste product of the nuclear power industry. Depleted uranium was used in armor-piercing munitions fired by US and Coalition forces during both the 2003 invasion and the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq.

There are between 300 and 365 sites where depleted uranium contamination was identified by Iraqi authorities the years following the 2003 US invasion, with an estimated cleanup cost of $30 million to $45 million, according to a report recently released by IKV Pax Christi. Iraqi authorities are currently cleaning up the sites, mostly located in the Basrah region, and 30 to 35 sites still need to be decontaminated.

The health impacts of depleted uranium have been subject to international debate since the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq, and the US and British governments have disputed allegations that their weapons have poisoned soldiers and civilians and caused increased rates of cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium is 40 percent less radioactive than uranium in its natural form, but the heavy metal is toxic and can potentially cause kidney damage, according to the US Department of Defense.

Doctors and researchers have reported increased rates of cancer and birth defects in areas where coalition forces used depleted uranium, but a lack of data and long-term studies in contaminated areas make it difficult to determine if depleted uranium contributed to the uptick in health problems along with other environmental and war-related factors, according to the report.

Sensationalist reports on the impacts of depleted uranium, along with a general distrust of both foreign and domestic authorities, have stoked continued anxiety among civilians about the potential dangers of contamination, the report states.

Research conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from 2006 to 2007 in four areas in Iraq determined that radioactivity from depleted uranium did not pose a significant health risk to civilians who might encounter residues or inhale airborne radioactive dusts, but the IAEA warned that civilians could be exposed to higher doses if they enter vehicles destroyed by depleted uranium munitions.

The IAEA has recommended that contaminated military equipment not be reprocessed as scrap and instead be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste.

The report also warns that scrap metal dealers are spreading contamination, and poor oversight has allowed children and other civilians access to contaminated areas and equipment with little or no information about the potential dangers of exposure.

The report documents evidence that depleted uranium munitions were fired on light vehicles, buildings and other civilian infrastructure, including the Iraqi Ministry of Planning in Baghdad.

"The use of depleted uranium in populated areas is alarming," the report states, casting doubt on previous assurances by coalition forces that depleted uranium would only be used on targeted armored vehicles, a major justification for using the heavy metal during the war.

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has estimated that 1,000 to 2,000 metric tons of depleted uranium was fired during the 2003 war in Iraq.

The extent of the depleted uranium contamination remains unclear, however, and the report blames a lack of transparency on behalf of coalition and US forces on the use of depleted uranium during the invasion. There is an absence of data and "crucial information" on the amount and types of depleted uranium weapons used, their targets, and the remediation efforts undertaken shortly after the war by the provisional government, making it difficult for international aid organizations and Iraqi authorities to assess and manage contamination with the ultimate goal of reducing harm to civilians.

Depleted Uranium Contamination is Still Spreading in Iraq

Are you really using Truth-Out as a source?

Jason Leopold and Marc Ash | Indictment Still Sealed, Fitzgerald Still Busy

Sealed vs. Sealed

Daily Kos: Truthout is dead to me.(poll)

Besides criticizing the source, as most of your knuckle draggers do when you don't like truth.
Are you trying to tell me that this is a LIE?

We didn't use tons of depleted uranium during the 2003 war in Iraq?

The Iraqi people are still suffering from the effects?

What exactly do you have a problem with then, besides the source? If that's all, then maybe I can enlighten you with other sources:

The U.S. war machine unleashed in Iraq | SocialistWorker.org

Iraq's depleted uranium clean-up to cost $30m as contamination spreads | Environment | guardian.co.uk

PressTV - Iraq DU clean-up to cost USD 30mn: Report

Iraq War: An Affront to Nuremberg | Consortiumnews

Killing is Winning » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Gulf War veteran says exposure to depleted uranium led to cancer | This is Nottingham

I can find all sorts of truthful links on Free Republc if I tried, but I'd still look like an idiot for using Free Republic as a source.
 
Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University

Stunning new statistics from the Watson Institute at Brown University’s ‘Costs of War’ report show that the decade-long War in Iraq has resulted in at least 189,000 deaths and cost more than $2 trillion. Expenses, including interest, could top $6 trillion through 2053.

In the decade since the United States invaded Iraq, a mind-boggling number of soldiers and civilians have been killed and trillions of dollars have been spent. But just how bad is it? Stunning new statistics from the “Costs of War” report by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University show the devastating toll the Iraq War has taken. Here is a sampling of the report’s updated data:

According to the project, there have been more than 189,000 direct war deaths. Some 134,000 civilians have been killed directly by war violence, and it is estimated that hundreds of thousands more have died from war-related hardships and illnesses.


Read more: Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University   - NY Daily News
 
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
Program development ... ·
Iran–Iraq War ·
The 1991 Persian Gulf War

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were ... were used extensively against Iran during ... uprisings against Kurds in 1991. Chemical weapons were ...

800px-WMD_world_map.svg.png

Yes and the Reagan administration took an official no comment stance. No condemnation of Iraq for using WMD's.

How could he, when he was arming the Iranians, now today's chicken hawks want to start a war with them. Start a war with N. Korea or better yet help the Syrian rebels, which either side isn't too friendly with the U.S., so then we find ourselves stuck in there for another decade.

Truthout has been predicting a war with Iran since 2006.

When will you idiots stop?

Government in Secret Talks About Strike Against Iran
 

Besides criticizing the source, as most of your knuckle draggers do when you don't like truth.
Are you trying to tell me that this is a LIE?

We didn't use tons of depleted uranium during the 2003 war in Iraq?

The Iraqi people are still suffering from the effects?

What exactly do you have a problem with then, besides the source? If that's all, then maybe I can enlighten you with other sources:

The U.S. war machine unleashed in Iraq | SocialistWorker.org

Iraq's depleted uranium clean-up to cost $30m as contamination spreads | Environment | guardian.co.uk

PressTV - Iraq DU clean-up to cost USD 30mn: Report

Iraq War: An Affront to Nuremberg | Consortiumnews

Killing is Winning » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Gulf War veteran says exposure to depleted uranium led to cancer | This is Nottingham

I can find all sorts of truthful links on Free Republc if I tried, but I'd still look like an idiot for using Free Republic as a source.

No, that's not why you're looking like an idiot..... You have yet to link, post or whatever to counter what I've posted. But you're worrying about looking like an idiot..:eek:
 
Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University

Stunning new statistics from the Watson Institute at Brown University’s ‘Costs of War’ report show that the decade-long War in Iraq has resulted in at least 189,000 deaths and cost more than $2 trillion. Expenses, including interest, could top $6 trillion through 2053.

In the decade since the United States invaded Iraq, a mind-boggling number of soldiers and civilians have been killed and trillions of dollars have been spent. But just how bad is it? Stunning new statistics from the “Costs of War” report by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University show the devastating toll the Iraq War has taken. Here is a sampling of the report’s updated data:

According to the project, there have been more than 189,000 direct war deaths. Some 134,000 civilians have been killed directly by war violence, and it is estimated that hundreds of thousands more have died from war-related hardships and illnesses.


Read more: Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University * - NY Daily News

War is expensive, dangerous, and bloody, that's true.

The world is better off without Saddam and the peaceful world is better off with the secret Iraq-France-Germany-Russia alliance disbanded.
 
Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University

Stunning new statistics from the Watson Institute at Brown University’s ‘Costs of War’ report show that the decade-long War in Iraq has resulted in at least 189,000 deaths and cost more than $2 trillion. Expenses, including interest, could top $6 trillion through 2053.

In the decade since the United States invaded Iraq, a mind-boggling number of soldiers and civilians have been killed and trillions of dollars have been spent. But just how bad is it? Stunning new statistics from the “Costs of War” report by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University show the devastating toll the Iraq War has taken. Here is a sampling of the report’s updated data:

According to the project, there have been more than 189,000 direct war deaths. Some 134,000 civilians have been killed directly by war violence, and it is estimated that hundreds of thousands more have died from war-related hardships and illnesses.


Read more: Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University * - NY Daily News

War is expensive, dangerous, and bloody, that's true.

The world is better off without Saddam and the peaceful world is better off with the secret Iraq-France-Germany-Russia alliance disbanded.
Iraq-France-Germany-Russia alliance?
 
I'll ask you again... tell us about Clinton's Iraq "spin".

While you're at it... throw in his hunt for Bin Laden for good measure.
 
Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University

Stunning new statistics from the Watson Institute at Brown University’s ‘Costs of War’ report show that the decade-long War in Iraq has resulted in at least 189,000 deaths and cost more than $2 trillion. Expenses, including interest, could top $6 trillion through 2053.

In the decade since the United States invaded Iraq, a mind-boggling number of soldiers and civilians have been killed and trillions of dollars have been spent. But just how bad is it? Stunning new statistics from the “Costs of War” report by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University show the devastating toll the Iraq War has taken. Here is a sampling of the report’s updated data:

According to the project, there have been more than 189,000 direct war deaths. Some 134,000 civilians have been killed directly by war violence, and it is estimated that hundreds of thousands more have died from war-related hardships and illnesses.


Read more: Human and financial costs of decade-long Iraq War analyzed in new study from Brown University * - NY Daily News

War is expensive, dangerous, and bloody, that's true.

The world is better off without Saddam and the peaceful world is better off with the secret Iraq-France-Germany-Russia alliance disbanded.
Iraq-France-Germany-Russia alliance?

The UN's oil-for-food scandal: Rolling up the culprits | The Economist
 

Forum List

Back
Top