Is An Assault Rifle Necessary

[Weatherman2020]

Now there a loud call to ban assault rifles. Like the AR15 that Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 people in Parkland, FL. The banners are saying they're unecessary.One person said "You don't need 600 rounds to stop 1 intruder."

That might be true - but what about if you're confronted by a menacing crowd of people >> a gang of violent thugs, MS-13, mafia, organized crime, a mean motorcycle gang, a lynch mob who mistakes you for someone else, or maybe just a bunch of drunk, dopey, street punks.

These all sound unlikely ? Until one of these situations occurs, and then it's too late to think abot the odds of it. A machine gun may be improper as Nikolas Cruz used it, but there are some scenarios in which it would be jsut the right thing to have. In some rural areas, where wolces travel around in

exactly take the Korean store owners during the L.A. riots

they had to defend themselves against multitudes of rioters

And were successful.

 

[ChrisL]

Well, I'm sure some store owners, etc., find these weapons to come in handy when trying to fend off rioters and looters.

You are in no position to say what someone else needs or doesn't need when it comes to defending their lives or livelihoods. It's not really your business at all actually.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Now there a loud call to ban assault rifles. Like the AR15 that Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 people in Parkland, FL. The banners are saying they're unecessary.One person said "You don't need 600 rounds to stop 1 intruder."

That might be true - but what about if you're confronted by a menacing crowd of people >> a gang of violent thugs, MS-13, mafia, organized crime, a mean motorcycle gang, a lynch mob who mistakes you for someone else, or maybe just a bunch of drunk, dopey, street punks.

These all sound unlikely ? Until one of these situations occurs, and then it's too late to think abot the odds of it. A machine gun may be improper as Nikolas Cruz used it, but there are some scenarios in which it would be jsut the right thing to have. In some rural areas, where wolces travel around in

exactly take the Korean store owners during the L.A. riots

they had to defend themselves against multitudes of rioters

And the black lives matter riots.....the store owners there had to stop the democrats from looting and burning their stores too....

yes indeed folks of all races defended stores and property from these violent thugs

 

[Care4all]

Now there a loud call to ban assault rifles. Like the AR15 that Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 people in Parkland, FL. The banners are saying they're unecessary.One person said "You don't need 600 rounds to stop 1 intruder."

That might be true - but what about if you're confronted by a menacing crowd of people >> a gang of violent thugs, MS-13, mafia, organized crime, a mean motorcycle gang, a lynch mob who mistakes you for someone else, or maybe just a bunch of drunk, dopey, street punks.

These all sound unlikely ? Until one of these situations occurs, and then it's too late to think abot the odds of it. A machine gun may be improper as Nikolas Cruz used it, but there are some scenarios in which it would be jsut the right thing to have. In some rural areas, where wolces travel around in

so, in all of those street scenarios you listed,

you would be carrying your AK47 or AR15 out on the street with you???

 

[LoneLaugher]

i'm surprised you guys come out from under your beds long enough to post

I find you fuckin retards so humorous. You dont want to be able to protect yourself and your family, you need a corrupt failure of a govt to do it. Thats how ridiculously desperate you are. You are THAT MUCH of a coward. Yet people that want to defend themselves and their family are the scared ones?
You are a complete dipshit.
Go jerk off to cuck porn, faggot

You live in fear. Why lash out at those who do not?

 

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Now there a loud call to ban assault rifles. Like the AR15 that Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 people in Parkland, FL. The banners are saying they're unecessary.One person said "You don't need 600 rounds to stop 1 intruder."

That might be true - but what about if you're confronted by a menacing crowd of people >> a gang of violent thugs, MS-13, mafia, organized crime, a mean motorcycle gang, a lynch mob who mistakes you for someone else, or maybe just a bunch of drunk, dopey, street punks.

These all sound unlikely ? Until one of these situations occurs, and then it's too late to think abot the odds of it. A machine gun may be improper as Nikolas Cruz used it, but there are some scenarios in which it would be jsut the right thing to have. In some rural areas, where wolces travel around in

I'm not sure what a wolce is, but buddy you live one interesting life

You get it!

 

[BULLDOG]

But...but...but... That's not how it is in the movies, or in my fantasys here I pretend I'm Dirty Harry

We saw people with AR-15s stopping violent looters from burning their stores in the Los Angeles riots and the Black Lives Matter riots..the only stores that weren't looted and burned were stores protected by people with AR-15 rifles.....so you don't know what you are talking about......

And on the border, where ranchers are isolated and can't simply call the police and have them there in 5 minutes...they have to deal with drug gangs moving drugs and illegals across their property...and the drug cartels actually have military weapons......they don't have AR-15s they have M4 carbines...provided to them by the Mexican police and military...

Yes, I'm sure an assault weapon would be very effective in those situations. Do you think that is the only gun that would have worked?

There are lots of rifles that would work.....and they all work the same as the AR-15, they just don't look the same as the AR-15...the same way a Camry and a Jeep have the same engine dynamics........so if you get the AR-15 you will be able to make a claim on all the other rifles too...since they all work the same........

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

--------------------------------------------- NOPE , and thats why the AR15 is needed plus it uses the same military caliber ammunition at this time Bulldog .

Actually any M16 produced after 1986 is illegal for any civilian to own and to get any parts legally one must have a federal permit. So it's not as easy as you think to convert an AR 15 to full auto with M16 parts[/QUOTE]

Didn't you say crooks don't care about what is legal?

 

[BULLDOG]

That might be true - but what about if you're confronted by a menacing crowd of people >> a gang of violent thugs, MS-13, mafia, organized crime, a mean motorcycle gang, a lynch mob who mistakes you for someone else, or maybe just a bunch of drunk, dopey, street punks.

These all sound unlikely ? Until one of these situations occurs, and then it's too late to think abot the odds of it. A machine gun may be improper as Nikolas Cruz used it, but there are some scenarios in which it would be jsut the right thing to have. In some rural areas, where wolces travel around in.
............................

Jesus, I am really scared. Funny thing is, I am over 70, and have several guns. I hunt, and have since I was a kid. And I have yet to have to pull a gun on anyone. Ever.
If you think an AR is going to keep you alive when a group of whomever comes to get you, then you are nuts. Better to get inside, call the cops. Then, you may want to wonder what you did to piss that group off. I would suggest if you reflect on it, you would see you are a dipshit. Cause gangs do not attack those who have not irritated them for no reason. And you do yourself, and your family, little good in getting yourself killed by a gang you just pissed off. You simply proved yourself stupid.

But...but...but... That's not how it is in the movies, or in my fantasys here I pretend I'm Dirty Harry

We saw people with AR-15s stopping violent looters from burning their stores in the Los Angeles riots and the Black Lives Matter riots..the only stores that weren't looted and burned were stores protected by people with AR-15 rifles.....so you don't know what you are talking about......

And on the border, where ranchers are isolated and can't simply call the police and have them there in 5 minutes...they have to deal with drug gangs moving drugs and illegals across their property...and the drug cartels actually have military weapons......they don't have AR-15s they have M4 carbines...provided to them by the Mexican police and military...

Yes, I'm sure an assault weapon would be very effective in those situations. Do you think that is the only gun that would have worked?

There are lots of rifles that would work.....and they all work the same as the AR-15, they just don't look the same as the AR-15...the same way a Camry and a Jeep have the same engine dynamics........so if you get the AR-15 you will be able to make a claim on all the other rifles too...since they all work the same........

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

Yep...they are the same, they use an internal combustion engine....so saying you want to ban the Camry because of it's engine...but only the Camry shows us that you plan on banning all the other cars too, since they all use the same engine......[/QUOTE]

Wow----I have 5 fingers on each hand, and Einstein has 5 fingers on each hand. I guess we are exactly the same.

 

[pismoe]

We saw people with AR-15s stopping violent looters from burning their stores in the Los Angeles riots and the Black Lives Matter riots..the only stores that weren't looted and burned were stores protected by people with AR-15 rifles.....so you don't know what you are talking about......

And on the border, where ranchers are isolated and can't simply call the police and have them there in 5 minutes...they have to deal with drug gangs moving drugs and illegals across their property...and the drug cartels actually have military weapons......they don't have AR-15s they have M4 carbines...provided to them by the Mexican police and military...

Yes, I'm sure an assault weapon would be very effective in those situations. Do you think that is the only gun that would have worked?

There are lots of rifles that would work.....and they all work the same as the AR-15, they just don't look the same as the AR-15...the same way a Camry and a Jeep have the same engine dynamics........so if you get the AR-15 you will be able to make a claim on all the other rifles too...since they all work the same........

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

--------------------------------------------- NOPE , and thats why the AR15 is needed plus it uses the same military caliber ammunition at this time Bulldog .

Actually any M16 produced after 1986 is illegal for any civilian to own and to get any parts legally one must have a federal permit. So it's not as easy as you think to convert an AR 15 to full auto with M16 parts

Didn't you say crooks don't care about what is legal?[/QUOTE]
-------------------------------------- no body that know guns think its easy to do an ILLEGAL conversion . Also , you can buy a full operational 'm16' in any Class 3 State Bulldog .

 

[pismoe]

no one cares though . Full auto is expensive Bulldog .

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, I'm sure an assault weapon would be very effective in those situations. Do you think that is the only gun that would have worked?

There are lots of rifles that would work.....and they all work the same as the AR-15, they just don't look the same as the AR-15...the same way a Camry and a Jeep have the same engine dynamics........so if you get the AR-15 you will be able to make a claim on all the other rifles too...since they all work the same........

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

--------------------------------------------- NOPE , and thats why the AR15 is needed plus it uses the same military caliber ammunition at this time Bulldog .

Actually any M16 produced after 1986 is illegal for any civilian to own and to get any parts legally one must have a federal permit. So it's not as easy as you think to convert an AR 15 to full auto with M16 parts

Didn't you say crooks don't care about what is legal?

-------------------------------------- no body that know guns think its easy to do an ILLEGAL conversion . Also , you can buy a full operational 'm16' in any Class 3 State Bulldog .[/QUOTE]

Bullshit. It's a hour job to convert one if you've never done it before. Of course it's illegal, but you've already established that crooks don't care about the law.

 

[MikeK]

So other than the slight modification to disable the select fire capability, what is the difference between the two?

What you call a "slight modification" is conversion of an ordinary semi-auto weapon into a machine-gun, which easily doubles its lethal potential in a mass-shooting event.

Your question regarding the difference between the two is best answered by the fact that all contemporary armed forces have seen fit to equip their soldiers with full-auto firearm capability. The simple answer is full-auto is substantially more lethal.

 

[BULLDOG]

So other than the slight modification to disable the select fire capability, what is the difference between the two?

What you call a "slight modification" is conversion of an ordinary semi-auto weapon into a machine-gun, which easily doubles its lethal potential in a mass-shooting event.

Your question regarding the difference between the two is best answered by the fact that all contemporary armed forces have seen fit to equip their soldiers with full-auto firearm capability. The simple answer is full-auto is substantially more lethal.

The military was presented with lots of guns with full auto options, so that particular feature isn't the reason they chose the M16. Why did they pick that particular weapon, that is essentially a clone of the AR 15?

 

[MikeK]

The military was presented with lots of guns with full auto options, so that particular feature isn't the reason they chose the M16.

What was the reason?

Why did they pick that particular weapon, that is essentially a clone of the AR 15?

Not relevant.

 

[pismoe]

There are lots of rifles that would work.....and they all work the same as the AR-15, they just don't look the same as the AR-15...the same way a Camry and a Jeep have the same engine dynamics........so if you get the AR-15 you will be able to make a claim on all the other rifles too...since they all work the same........

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

--------------------------------------------- NOPE , and thats why the AR15 is needed plus it uses the same military caliber ammunition at this time Bulldog .

Actually any M16 produced after 1986 is illegal for any civilian to own and to get any parts legally one must have a federal permit. So it's not as easy as you think to convert an AR 15 to full auto with M16 parts

Didn't you say crooks don't care about what is legal?

-------------------------------------- no body that know guns think its easy to do an ILLEGAL conversion . Also , you can buy a full operational 'm16' in any Class 3 State Bulldog .

Bullshit. It's a hour job to convert one if you've never done it before. Of course it's illegal, but you've already established that crooks don't care about the law.[/QUOTE]
--------------------------------------------------- as i said , illegal conversion isn't easy plus its illegal . And class 3 can be bought in class 3 states Bulldog .

 

[hadit]

i'm surprised you guys come out from under your beds long enough to post

I find you fuckin retards so humorous. You dont want to be able to protect yourself and your family, you need a corrupt failure of a govt to do it. Thats how ridiculously desperate you are. You are THAT MUCH of a coward. Yet people that want to defend themselves and their family are the scared ones?
You are a complete dipshit.
Go jerk off to cuck porn, faggot

You can't figure out how to protect your family without an AR-15?

Sure I can. How about any other semiautomatic rifle, or a handgun, or a shotgun.

Firearms the the single best tool for self defense

The single best tool for self defence is not putting yourself in the situation.

Foolish students for going to school.

 

[BULLDOG]

The military was presented with lots of guns with full auto options, so that particular feature isn't the reason they chose the M16.

What was the reason?

Why did they pick that particular weapon, that is essentially a clone of the AR 15?

Not relevant.

Of course it is. The M16 stood out from all the other possibilities, and we have established that select fire could not have been the reason for that. That only leaves features that the M16 shares with the AR15. The goto assault weapon of the US military and the Ar15 are essentially the same other than select fire.

 

[BULLDOG]

Sure, but the Camry and Jeep aren't essentially the same, and the parts aren't interchangeable. An AR and an M16 are, and the parts are ALL interchangeable, other than the slight modification to disable select fire.. Do any other guns have 100% interchangeability with the M16 military assault weapon?

--------------------------------------------- NOPE , and thats why the AR15 is needed plus it uses the same military caliber ammunition at this time Bulldog .

Actually any M16 produced after 1986 is illegal for any civilian to own and to get any parts legally one must have a federal permit. So it's not as easy as you think to convert an AR 15 to full auto with M16 parts

Didn't you say crooks don't care about what is legal?

-------------------------------------- no body that know guns think its easy to do an ILLEGAL conversion . Also , you can buy a full operational 'm16' in any Class 3 State Bulldog .

Bullshit. It's a hour job to convert one if you've never done it before. Of course it's illegal, but you've already established that crooks don't care about the law.

--------------------------------------------------- as i said , illegal conversion isn't easy plus its illegal . And class 3 can be bought in class 3 states Bulldog .[/QUOTE]

Nice try, but you lose.

 

[Uncensored2008]

i'm surprised you guys come out from under your beds long enough to post

Shouldn't you be out kicking in doors of the houses of normals to disarm them?

If you want to take guns and civil rights, do it yourself coward.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

you know less about reality than you do about computational biology

now, hop back under the bed

Is that the "reality" you cling to that was induced by tainted hallucinogens, dull?