Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
#1 Trump isn’t charged with bribes.
#2 The Daniels payment by Cohen was Oct 2016, Trumps first check was Feb 2017. That’s 4 months not “over a year” later and only 1 after being sworn in as President.
WW
2 is factually incorrect
What about it?What about the audio of Trump and Cohen figuring out how to pay off Karen McDougal?
Said it before so read it
There is no “bribe” when the event already happened and then the money issues arise well afterward.
Also, it’s perfectly fine and legal for Trump to pay a woman to not talk about sexual issues.
Your entire uproar is rooted in fallacy
I think it would be pretty easy to prove willful intent in regard to falsification of business records. Bragg has the check register and all business check register have a line for the purpose of the check. I can't believe Trump wrote pay off the whores and hide it. In every owner business I have seen, what goes in check register is what goes in business records with little variation.I read he has to prove willful intent to commit a crime and not some bookkeeping entry error. We'll see.
What about it?
Is there a crime regarding her?It's evidence Trump knew what was going on.
I think after Bragg makes his opening statement at the trial, the jurors are going be asking why would Cohen spend over over $300,000 in hushmoney and over $100,000 in legal fees if Trump did not commit to pay him back.Which means that the Bragg case is bogus on its face. Remember he's claiming that the payments TRUMP made to Cohen were to influence voters in the 2016 election, but the payments that TRUMP made weren't made until 2017...LONG AFTER the election so how could Trump's payments "influenced voters?"
"Also, it’s perfectly fine and legal for Trump to pay a woman to not talk about sexual issues.Said it before so read it
There is no “bribe” when the event already happened and then the money issues arise well afterward.
Also, it’s perfectly fine and legal for Trump to pay a woman to not talk about sexual issues.
Your entire uproar is rooted in fallacy
Bull shit.ANTIFA
ANTIFA
ANTIFA
They are going to be asking why Cohen went to jail and why Trump shouldn't go to jail.I think after Bragg makes his opening statement at the trial, the jurors are going be asking why would Cohen spend over over $300,000 in hushmoney and over $100,000 in legal fees if Trump did not commit to pay him back.
The evidence is going to show that Cohen's cost in legal fees and hushmoney was $420,000 which happen to be the amount of money that Trump paid Cohen in 2017-18, 12 payments of $35,000 which equals the $420,000 invoiced by Cohen. If Trump's lawyers don't succeed in getting evidence throw out, Trump will likely be fount guilty.
However, there is still lot's of unknows. Will there be recorded phone conversations between Trump and Cohen linking Trump to the hushmoney. Will both Cohen and and representative's of the Enquirer link Trump to payments and the election. And then there's the question of whether all the evidence in the Cohen investigation involving Trump will be available to Bragg. And of course the evidence from Trump's defense is unknown. Despite the evidence that Brag is likely to have, it could go either ways.
Weird how the FEC, ya know.....they outfit in charge of election laws, doesn't see it how you see it. I'll go with them over some leftard hack on the innerwebs."Also, it’s perfectly fine and legal for Trump to pay a woman to not talk about sexual issues.
Your entire uproar is rooted in fallacy.
For Trump, that is true provided Trump declares the payments campaign contributions and campaign expenses. Trump sure as hell was not going to do that so he turned to Cohen his lawyer to make this all go away so it would not effect the election. It seemed Cohen did just that and Trump started reimbursing Cohen the month after he took office. The problem came about when the FBI started an investigation of Cohen and then the whole convoluted scheme to isolate himself and trump from the hushmoney payments fell apart. Cohen confessed and implicated Trump. Cohen went to jail and was disbarred and the DOJ decide they would not go after the sitting president.
Weird how the FEC, ya know.....they outfit in charge of election laws, doesn't see it how you see it. I'll go with them over some leftard hack on the innerwebs.
Tell Flopper.Trump wasn't indicted for FEC campaign violations, that was Cohen. Trump was indicted for falsification of business records in the first degree.
The FEC has nothing to do with Trump's indictment.
WW
Tell Flopper.
Really? When did YOU hear those tapes?Actually there’s all sorts of evidence… including tapes
The part that implies Trump was illegally “buying silence”View attachment 780572
1. Cohen's illegal campaign contribution occurred in October 2016 when he took out a personal loan against his house, established the shell company, deposited the money in the shell company account, and then paid Daniels for the NDA.
2. As show above the Grand Jury indicted Trump and the first check was cut in February 2017.
3. NOV - DEC - JAN - FEB, roughly speaking is 4 months.
.
.
.
.
So what part is factually incorrect?
WW
Is there a crime regarding her?
The part that implies Trump was illegally “buying silence”
Also the part that has a states attorney trying to run federal charges through his state.
Part of your fakery is the excessive indexing you use. That fools zero thinkers.
What crime is Trump charged with where they name her?Yes.
