Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[danielpalos]

It is ethical for the democrats to advance an agenda of a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

 

[ding]

It is ethical for the democrats to advance an agenda of a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

I believe they believe it is but it will have no effect other to increase inflation.

It isn’t ethical because it is an illusion. It won’t change the standard of living at all.

 

[ding]

Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

 

[ding]

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms

How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.

There’s a lot of truth in allegories and metaphors.

Yes I never knew you hated the blacks enough to want them subjugated to the GOP on their plantation.

You need to learn some history.

I know muchas about history. Some of the blacks that vote for the GOP are on welfare, just as some of the blacks that vote for the Dems are on welfare.......

Only one party sells the victim meme. It’s like a con man telling you what you want to hear to get what they want.

 

[ding]

Democratic Plantation= Housing, food, healthcare, education

Republican Plantation = Prison

If that were the case the plight of the black community wouldn’t be what it is.

 

[danielpalos]

It is ethical for the democrats to advance an agenda of a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

I believe they believe it is but it will have no effect other to increase inflation.

It isn’t ethical because it is an illusion. It won’t change the standard of living at all.

It must change it; a cost of living adjustment, does just that. Higher paid labor pays more in Taxes including payroll taxes. And create more in demand.

 

[danielpalos]

Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

 

[ding]

Just the militant ones.

Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.

Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.

only national socialists, claim that.

Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

 

[danielpalos]

Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.

Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.

only national socialists, claim that.

Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

 

[ding]

Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

 

[ding]

Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.

only national socialists, claim that.

Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Not a communist clause.

 

[danielpalos]

Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.

 

[danielpalos]

only national socialists, claim that.

Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Not a communist clause.

You brought it up.

 

[ding]

Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.

Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.

 

[ding]

Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Not a communist clause.

You brought it up.

No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.

 

[danielpalos]

we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.

Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.

We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Not a communist clause.

You brought it up.

No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.

with a Commerce Clause?

 

[ding]

That is not something the government should or can do.

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.

Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.

We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

Which is poorly understood by you.

 

[ding]

That sounds like a Trojan horse to me.

Why don’t you just come right out and say you want the government to regulate every aspect of commerce?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Not a communist clause.

You brought it up.

No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.

with a Commerce Clause?

Yes.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, it is, and it must. technology is improving all the time.

That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?

sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.

Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.

We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

Which is poorly understood by you.

i merely gainsay your contention and claim your understanding is worse.