Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[Taz]

employment is at-will not for-cause of a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

 

[ding]

So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

 

[Taz]

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

 

[ding]

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

 

[Taz]

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

 

[ding]

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.

 

[Taz]

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.

Still doesn't make all atheists commies.

 

[ding]

I kind of figured you for a communist. Most militant atheists are.

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.

Still doesn't make all atheists commies.

Just the militant ones.

 

[Taz]

Only communists bomb Muslims?

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.

Still doesn't make all atheists commies.

Just the militant ones.

Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.

 

[danielpalos]

Communism requires social morals for free; a God told us that. Ten simple Commandments and we could have a secular and temporal, commune of Heaven on Earth.

So what? Why didn't communism work?

a lack of social morals for free. that happens in Nexus 6 with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Government does not need morals. In communism they only need to set wages, prices and profits. Why didn't the government setting wages, profits and prices a failure?

with social morals for free; we Only need Ten simple Commandments from a God, not the Expense of Government.

That has nothing to do with anything.

Why did the government controlling markets fail?

lol. dude; you can't be very serious with that much cognitive dissonance.

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror IS Government controlling markets.

The right wing prefers to blame the Poor.

 

[danielpalos]

a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor. the right wing prefers to punish the poor than to promote the general welfare.

How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

employment is at-will not for-cause of a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

lol. I am beginning to think you don't understand what you claim.

 

[danielpalos]

So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

 

[Taz]

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?

 

[danielpalos]

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?

There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.

 

[Taz]

That makes 2 of you.

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?

There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.

We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.

 

[danielpalos]

I'm not the one who believes that the government setting wages, prices and profits works.

But I suspect you do. What say you?

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?

There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.

We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.

No, we didn't. The Union had to Win, Because only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed. Regardless of all of the other ones.

 

[Taz]

Government should stick to bombing Muslims.

no care and no cause, for natural rights?

We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?

There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.

We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.

No, we didn't. The Union had to Win, Because only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed. Regardless of all of the other ones.

We're free to bomb Mooslims, aren't we?

 

[ding]

So what? Why didn't communism work?

a lack of social morals for free. that happens in Nexus 6 with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Government does not need morals. In communism they only need to set wages, prices and profits. Why didn't the government setting wages, profits and prices a failure?

with social morals for free; we Only need Ten simple Commandments from a God, not the Expense of Government.

That has nothing to do with anything.

Why did the government controlling markets fail?

lol. dude; you can't be very serious with that much cognitive dissonance.

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror IS Government controlling markets.

The right wing prefers to blame the Poor.

Prove it.

 

[ding]

How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

employment is at-will not for-cause of a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?

under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.

lol. I am beginning to think you don't understand what you claim.

My claim is that you are a troll and don’t know what you are talking about because you have never even tried to prove anything.

 

[ding]

Only militant atheists are communists.

The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?

And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.

Still doesn't make all atheists commies.

Just the militant ones.

Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.

Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.