Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms
How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.
 
Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms
How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.
There’s a lot of truth in allegories and metaphors.
 
Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms
How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.
There’s a lot of truth in allegories and metaphors.
Yes I never knew you hated the blacks enough to want them subjugated to the GOP on their plantation.
 
The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?
And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.
Still doesn't make all atheists commies.
Just the militant ones.
Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.
Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.
So I'm not actually one. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms
How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.
There’s a lot of truth in allegories and metaphors.
Yes I never knew you hated the blacks enough to want them subjugated to the GOP on their plantation.
You need to learn some history.
 
And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.
Still doesn't make all atheists commies.
Just the militant ones.
Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.
Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.
So I'm not actually one. Thanks for clearing that up.
You’re on the bubble.

At a minimum you are certainly their dupe.
 
no care and no cause, for natural rights?
We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?
There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.
We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.
No, we didn't. The Union had to Win, Because only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed. Regardless of all of the other ones.
We're free to bomb Mooslims, aren't we?
maybe, if you pay wartime tax rates. cutting taxes means you cannot be serious and must be frivolous in public venues.
 
a lack of social morals for free. that happens in Nexus 6 with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.
Government does not need morals. In communism they only need to set wages, prices and profits. Why didn't the government setting wages, profits and prices a failure?
with social morals for free; we Only need Ten simple Commandments from a God, not the Expense of Government.
That has nothing to do with anything.

Why did the government controlling markets fail?
lol. dude; you can't be very serious with that much cognitive dissonance.

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror IS Government controlling markets.

The right wing prefers to blame the Poor.
Prove it.
Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment for the Poor!

Only those who "hate the Poor", won't like it.
 
employment is at-will not for-cause of a work ethic from the Age of Iron.
So what? How is there a lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor?
under employment at-will; Labor can collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.
Still not an answer or an explanation.

I am beginning to think you don't know what you are talking about.
lol. I am beginning to think you don't understand what you claim.
My claim is that you are a troll and don’t know what you are talking about because you have never even tried to prove anything.
i resort to the fewest fallacies. You simply appeal to ignorance of everything.
 
The only real commies left are in North Korea. And where do you get that atheists want a one-state party?

(back to OP) And by handouts, if they mean food stamps and the like, would GOPers prefer if poor people starved to death? Is that what it's come to in this country?
And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.
Still doesn't make all atheists commies.
Just the militant ones.
Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.
Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.
only national socialists, claim that.
 
We have a natural right to bomb Mooslims. See how that works?
There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.
We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.
No, we didn't. The Union had to Win, Because only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed. Regardless of all of the other ones.
We're free to bomb Mooslims, aren't we?
maybe, if you pay wartime tax rates. cutting taxes means you cannot be serious and must be frivolous in public venues.
We're bombing Mooslims right now. Tax rates are fine.
 
And yet history proves that there has never been a communist state that was not a militant atheist state.
Still doesn't make all atheists commies.
Just the militant ones.
Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.
Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.
only national socialists, claim that.
Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.
 
Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.
 
There is no general warfare clause; we have a general welfare clause.
We fought a Civil War to be able to be free to bomb Mooslims.
No, we didn't. The Union had to Win, Because only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed. Regardless of all of the other ones.
We're free to bomb Mooslims, aren't we?
maybe, if you pay wartime tax rates. cutting taxes means you cannot be serious and must be frivolous in public venues.
We're bombing Mooslims right now. Tax rates are fine.
Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics: U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Special pleading in a Vacuum is All they know.
 
Still doesn't make all atheists commies.
Just the militant ones.
Not even, there's virtually no commies in North America.
Sure there are. Danny is one and you aren’t far off from being one.
only national socialists, claim that.
Anyone who believes that the government should set prices, profits and wages as you do qualifies as a communist.
fixing Standards for a State or the Union is a Government responsibility. You simply have Only and Merely, a fallacy of Composition and false Cause.
 
Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.
we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.
 
Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms
How....metaphorical and allegorical all at the same time.
There’s a lot of truth in allegories and metaphors.
Yes I never knew you hated the blacks enough to want them subjugated to the GOP on their plantation.
You need to learn some history.
I know muchas about history. Some of the blacks that vote for the GOP are on welfare, just as some of the blacks that vote for the Dems are on welfare.......
 
Now... back to the OP.

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

If you don't believe that is what they are doing you are free to argue that.
we need to actually solve the inefficiencies of our economy. it falls under infrastructure.
All our leaders want to do is increase the police force and the military and then tell us no, and forget about your rights also you won't need them....
 
Democratic Plantation= Housing, food, healthcare, education

Republican Plantation = Prison
 

Forum List

Back
Top