Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

Not a communist clause.
You brought it up.
No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.
with a Commerce Clause?
Yes.
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
 
That’s not the government doing that.

Are you suggesting improving technology is a bad thing?
sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.
Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.
We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

Which is poorly understood by you.
i merely gainsay your contention and claim your understanding is worse.
Yours is worse. :smile:
 
You brought it up.
No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.
with a Commerce Clause?
Yes.
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
 
sure it is; Government spending. i believe the physical layer of infrastructure should left to the public sector.
Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.
We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

Which is poorly understood by you.
i merely gainsay your contention and claim your understanding is worse.
Yours is worse. :smile:
not mine; Yours.
 
No. You brought it up because you have an unreasonable expectation of the role of government.
with a Commerce Clause?
Yes.
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
 
Don’t be silly. Technology is not a bad thing. Improving efficiency is a good thing.

Any spending beyond one's means is a bad thing; government or otherwise.

Government spending on public infrastructure is a good thing as long as it is within their means.

Government trying to manage or control commerce is a bad thing.

The role of the government is to do for the people what the people cannot do for themselves. Not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.
We have a Commerce Clause built in to our Constitution.

Which is poorly understood by you.
i merely gainsay your contention and claim your understanding is worse.
Yours is worse. :smile:
not mine; Yours.
I’m entirely reasonable.
 
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
 
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
 
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Not so at all. Can you tell me why you believe it is?
 
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
 
In what manner is our Commerce Clause communist?
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Not so at all. Can you tell me why you believe it is?
Commerce among the several States is a federal jurisdiction.
 
I didn’t say it was. I said you have an realistic expectation for what it means.
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
 
what unreasonable expectation do you allege I have regarding our Commerce Clause.
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. The Power is available.
 
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. The Power is available.
So what you are saying is you define the rule by exception, right?
 
That government has the power to regulate all aspects of commerce.
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. The Power is available.
Can you give me an example of that BTW?
 
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. The Power is available.
So what you are saying is you define the rule by exception, right?
not me; we have Government for that.
 
Licensing requirements pretty much does that.
Do you believe government has the power to regulate wages, prices and profits?
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. A real, wartime economy may require it.
How about non wartime Mr define the rule by exception.
Yes. That already happens in some sectors. The Power is available.
Can you give me an example of that BTW?
Socialism "hard at work bailing out Capitalism ever single day.": FDIC: Mission, Vision and Values
 

Forum List

Back
Top