Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Define "owned"Israelites owned that land since 600 CE.
Muslims stole their land and built their religious crap on top of Israelite religious crap.Define "owned"
"In the late nineteenth century, prior to the rise of Zionism, Jews are thought to have comprised between 2% and 5% of the population of Palestine, although the precise population is not known.[90]
"Jewish immigration had begun following the 1839 Tanzimat reforms; between 1840 and 1880, the Jewish population of Palestine rose from 9,000 to 23,000.[91]"
Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia
so----the population of JEWISH PALESTINE consisted of the survivors of INCESSANT Roman, Christian and Muslim genocide over the past 2000 years. Your point? you support land ownership by GENOCIDE? Things are straightening out now---to some extent.Define "owned"
"In the late nineteenth century, prior to the rise of Zionism, Jews are thought to have comprised between 2% and 5% of the population of Palestine, although the precise population is not known.[90]
"Jewish immigration had begun following the 1839 Tanzimat reforms; between 1840 and 1880, the Jewish population of Palestine rose from 9,000 to 23,000.[91]"
Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia
Wrong! The military necessity must outweigh the civilian casualties.Right, the target must not be civilians. The target must be military or the infrastructure that supports the military.
Use a damn school to store weapons, fire at the IDF, it is no longer a school.Wrong! Targets must be of military necessity. And when it comes to hospitals and schools, the level of civilian damage, far outweighs military necessity.
WRONG---did you spend time in active duty?--the first law is SURVIVE---the second law is MAKE SURE YOUR BUDDIES SURVIVE. It is actually illegal to NOT TRY TO SURVIVE and illegal to not protect your own. Nobody gets a medal for getting killed or letting the enemy killWrong! The military necessity must outweigh the civilian casualties.
You might feel that to be true, it isn't,Wrong! The military necessity must outweigh the civilian casualties.
its not true for any military----brillo has NO IDEAYou might feel that to be true, it isn't,
Where is your proof that Israel agreed to abide by such a rule?
Yes, I think so, there are rare cases where this is justifiable:The answer is "NO". I don't care if the enemy had their headquarters there. The answer is still "NO".
US-made munitions used in Israeli strike on Gaza school that killed 22, experts say
No. YOU are wrong. And lying. And supporting a terrorist organization. Once you fire from a location, it's now a legitimate target. No word from you on Hamas using human shields...Wrong! Targets must be of military necessity. And when it comes to hospitals and schools, the level of civilian damage, far outweighs military necessity.
silence is assent. SHE LIKES THE IDEANo. YOU are wrong. And lying. And supporting a terrorist organization. Once you fire from a location, it's now a legitimate target. No word from you on Hamas using human shields...
I beg your pardon? you seem to have that back to front.No. YOU are wrong. And lying. And supporting a terrorist organization. Once you fire from a location, it's now a legitimate target. No word from you on Hamas using human shields...
That image is fabricated.
Of course more left wing bias by Wikipedia.Define "owned"
"In the late nineteenth century, prior to the rise of Zionism, Jews are thought to have comprised between 2% and 5% of the population of Palestine, although the precise population is not known.[90]
"Jewish immigration had begun following the 1839 Tanzimat reforms; between 1840 and 1880, the Jewish population of Palestine rose from 9,000 to 23,000.[91]"
Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia
Civilian casualties are a 100% possibly in war, especially urban warfare. Of course innocent civilians get killed, but it due to Hamas hiding in said urban areas. And Israel is trying to wipe Hamas off the face of the Earth.Wrong! The military necessity must outweigh the civilian casualties.
You just want the Jews suffer and face massacre after massacre by Hamas. You keep spreading Hamas propaganda even when we prove you wrong.There were no beheaded babies on October 7th.
It's just another lie racist, greedy Jews tell to deflect from their baby-killing exploits in Palestine.
‘Not a normal war’: doctors say children have been targeted by Israeli snipers in Gaza
"'Not a normal war’: doctors say children have been targeted by Israeli snipers in Gaza"
Really? I think you get angry when people don't kiss your ass in the manner to which you believe you're entitled.Lmao!!!!
a. It's a lie because it's untrue, DipWeed.
2. like I keep telling the other tRumpling, you kids aren't smart enough to hurt my feelings.
It could, if multiple safety systems were disabled. That's why Israel bombed Iraq's reactor before it was fueled. No danger of radiation release.somehow---I believe it MIGHT happen that bombing of a nuclear reactor---COULD remotely---cause a melt down---but unlikely
Why do you guys always use the same photo? Don't you have other examples of IDF using human shields, or are you making it up?
I do know what I'm talking about, because every year of my 20 years in the Air Force, we had training on the Law of Armed Conflict.Alright fucker, it is obvious you don't know what you are talking about. Let me help you out...
Military necessity | How does law protect in war? - Online casebook
casebook.icrc.org
Hamas' actions in the hospital removed the hospital's protected status. Period. End of story. Your pathetic little tantrum has no effect on reality.4. Definition of military objectives
P I, Art. 52(2) and (3) [CIHL, Rule 8]
Introductory text
When the focus of the law on the conduct of hostilities shifted from the prohibition to attack undefended towns and villages[1] to the rule that only military objectives may be attacked, the definition of military objectives became crucial. The principle of distinction is practically worthless unless at least one of the categories between which the attacker has to distinguish is defined. From the point of view of the philosophy of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), it would have been more satisfactory to define civilian objects. However, because objects become military objectives according to their use by the enemy or potential use by the attacker rather than because of their intrinsic character, it was military objectives that were defined. Indeed, all objects other than those benefiting from special protection[2] can become military objectives.
