Is John Kerry The Most Useless Sec. of State in U.S. History?

Man, that's a tough call.

Going with the Hildebeast for now simply because she had longer to accomplish virtually nothing, other than not approving increased security in Benghazi.
 
I agree Hillary was.
John Kerry is naturally inept/incapable of accomplishing anything. That's a gimme. Hillary went out of her way to prove total ineptness during her tenure as SOS.
Both should be tried for treason regardless.
 
Kerry aka Lurch scares the shit out of me....
What the hell happened to his face anyway?
Botox injections,industrial grade silicon,bad face job...

He's out there saying shit that the WH corrects hours later.
 
After Colin "Yellowcake" Powell and Condi "Smoking Gun" Rice it is not too difficult to appear accomplished

Both Hillary and Kerry did not meet rightwing expectations for what a Secretary of State should do. They actually stooped to diplomacy (every conservative knows diplomacy is for pussies) and they didn't invade anyone

How can you be a Secretary of State without an invasion to your name?
 
After Colin "Yellowcake" Powell and Condi "Smoking Gun" Rice it is not too difficult to appear accomplished

Both Hillary and Kerry did not meet rightwing expectations for what a Secretary of State should do. They actually stooped to diplomacy (every conservative knows diplomacy is for pussies) and they didn't invade anyone

How can you be a Secretary of State without an invasion to your name?



good one dork; what just happened the other day?


ISIS took over a warehouse containing what again?
 
The article makes a good argument for Kerry being the most useless. I'd still like to see a failure by failure matchup with Hillary.
 
Hillary's disastrous reset with Russia might swamp three of Kerry's failures. Since Hillary has said that the reset button was the most brilliant strategic move in all of American history, that might wipe out a few more. Because of the Russian reset's monumental failure, Hillary might move ahead in the useless category.
 
It is, perhaps, unfair to criticize either Swifty Kerry nor Hillary so vigorously.

They have never been given the opportunity to perform their jobs under an experienced, America-focused, resolute and vision-capable executive leadership.

They might very well have under-performed just as badly under such a leadership.

But we'll never know the answer to that question.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I feel sorry for Kerry having the job of being Pres. Obama's Sec. of State.

He has to travel around the world trying to implement Obama's foreign policy.

But the problem is......no one knows what Obama's foreign policy is.....including Obama. .. :cool:
 

The problem here is twofold.

The first is Kerry’s exalted vision of his own diplomatic skills. As soon he was sworn in, he threw caution to the winds and embarked on a course that a wiser man would have understood was merely a repeat of the mistakes of the past.

Kerry’s conduct must even have the White House starting to rethink the decision to give him the freedom to carry out his plans. Though his predecessor Hillary Clinton’s accomplishments in her four years at Foggy Bottom were slim (other, that is, than racking up frequent flier miles), right now she is starting to look like a foreign-policy giant by comparison.

Is Kerry the Worst Secretary of State Ever? « Commentary Magazine
 

Forum List

Back
Top