BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 17,667
- 1,429
- 85
.If you believe so strongly that it's ok to kill humans in order to save the planet. . .
I certainly believe the Garden Earth is more important than one species, humanity - and live life accordingly so to be admitted to the Everlasting ...
its a carnivorous planet both Fauna and Flora, what goes around comes around I suggest you starve yourself to death so as not to take from others to provide for what has yet to be fed.
.
I'm sure that makes sense to a complete simpleton such as yourself. Thankfully, most people who have more than three brain cells in their cranium already know that the amount of food on the planet is not finite. That starving one person does not feed another, etc.
That said, if you seriously think it's for the greater good?
You go first.
Thankfully, most people who have more than three brain cells in their cranium already know that the amount of food on the planet is not finite.
Chuz: I'm sure that makes sense to a complete simpleton such as yourself.
I'm a little lost, all food in our Garden is living prior to their demise - isn't that your first criteria and to believe life on Earth is not finite or that you do not take a life to survive is absurd ...
.
That said, if you seriously think it's for the greater good?
You go first.
your confused, the greater good is Garden Earth not humanity and that is why the remediation is made lawful.
In believe nothing in this direction ... As far as I'm able to see exists indeed a moral right to defend human beings against abortion executioners ... It exists even in a much more clear way than Georg Elser had the moral right to kill Adolf Hitler.
In believe nothing in this direction ...
which direction, humanity is the Almighty's choice over Garden Earth and since you have no problem with killing what makes your decision any different than the woman's ...
.