OriginalShroom
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 4,950
- 1,042
- 190
Someone made an anonymous "donation" of $200,000 to buy guns in Phoenix Ariz. last month.
Who was it?
Was it Major Bloomberg? New York City's mayor and gun hater supreme?
If so... Will he be charged with the Thousands of felonies he and others have committed?
Who was it?
Was it Major Bloomberg? New York City's mayor and gun hater supreme?
If so... Will he be charged with the Thousands of felonies he and others have committed?
Alan Korwin: How to buy 2,000 guns, out of state, with no paperwork | The Daily Caller
Someone anonymously provided $200,000, to buy 2,000 guns in Phoenix, in May 2013, using $100 grocery gift cards as the money.
If it was billionaire mayor Michael Bloomberg as the well-founded rumors suggest, he would have had to do it anonymously, and wash the money pretty good, because its illegal to buy guns like that across state lines. Buying 2,000 guns that way would be 2,000 federal and state felonies.
Giving money to someone else to buy guns for you knowing you cant buy them yourself would be a straw purchase, something mayor Bloomberg knows is strictly illegal, since he has been fighting against straw buyers publicly for a long time. We dont know who put up the cash and he sure isnt saying. The crime doesnt require that the true buyer ultimately receive the guns, just that the money moves through a knowing straw man (or woman).
The broadcast and print news media promoted the buyback event, proclaimed it good, spewed hyperbole about taking guns off the street, making us safer, disarming criminals, saving children. At last, something good was being done about all those nasty guns. You couldnt miss the fanfare, it was even on billboards. There was no mention how that was paid for.
These guns were never on the street of course, with its dirty ghetto connotation, they were in closets and drawers in folks homes.
Somebody wrote the check that provided the money that was given to the perpetrators that bought the guns in the Phoenix gun buyback. It doesnt matter who. And its really a buy-up, you cant buy back something you never owned in the first place.
HOW WAS IT DONE?
We know how it was done. The anonymous bag man gave the money to Hildy Saizow and her anti-gun-rights group, the deceptively named Arizonans for Gun Safety (AGS), according to Phoenix police. Who has AGS taught gun safety to lately? Thats rhetorical; the answer is no one, ever. Theyre in the business of buying guns to melt, and campaigning against gun ownership and gun rights.
They took the lucre and gave it to Bashas grocers, which includes Food City and AJs Fine Foods. The Bashas turned it into 2,000 $100 grocery gift cards. Its not known if the insiders transacting these dollars for grocery cards for eventual guns cut discounts for each other, announcing big numbers but using smaller figures between themselves. They know of course, but you could have been lied to, there is zero accountability (the donor wants to be anonymous), and your Mayor, Greg Stanton, a member of Bloombergs Mayors Against Guns (MAG)*, is in cahoots and playing along.
The value in the end though was $200,000 in retail cards to consumers, the event was a sellout. You should also know, as people in the business do, about 30% of gift cards are never returned, and a large percent are either never fully spent, or end up spent well over the card limit, a profit center for the issuer. So they do get big discounts on the publicized amounts. But I digress again.
So thats how Bloomberg (or MAG, his anti-rights group, or whoever it was, we dont know and the police and BATFE arent telling) washed all the anonymous cash. The $100 cards were given out with the Phoenix police, right at the churches where the buy-ups took place, and the consumers got them right at the point of exchange. Payment for goods received. We can all do that, right?
An exchange of value like that has a name. Its called a sale. In a voluntary abandonment or relinquishing of property you dont get anything. Phoenix PD didnt just get 2,000 guns, as one officer feebly mumbled. Those guns cost somebody two hundred grand.
We also know that a lot, maybe most of the people turned into virtually worthless junk and ripped off the system, so the cash may have bought far less than you think. Police do have plans to keep whatever they consider historic.
WHO OWNS THE 2,000 GUNS?
Thats a good question. Who has title to the property? Why didnt the media ask? Oh, thats right, theyre 100% in the tank for this dog-and-pony show honorable reporters need not apply.
The city washes its hands of all direct financial involvement, with Mayor Stanton quick at the draw with no tax money used before you even ask. Scores of city police officers have been involved. Scheduling, cruisers, traffic control, coordination with the churches, advertising, press conferences. No one believes that no tax money was used. But thats their story and theyre sticking it to you.