wamose
Diamond Member
There's exactly zero evidence to the contrary that Trump was only looking to expose criminality within the US government. The whistleblower's lawyer already admitted in writing that there are plenty of plants inside the White House bureaucracy that are looking to do everything they can to overthrow Trump. Trump has every right to be concerned with potential traitors inside our government. There is no possible way to prove any criminality by Trump when all the testimony is either heresay or individual interpretations by liberal partisans and in most cases the heresay is second or third party, some from anonymous sources. This whole thing is fabricated BS, just like the dude tweeted it would be back in 2017.Every fucking transaction in history has been quid-pro-quo whether implicit or explicit.Is Quid Pro Quo a crime? If so, then virtually all Executive decisions and Legislation passed by Congress is also a crime, because they demand some sort of performance in exchange for a benefit (usually money).
However, demanding a personal (or family) benefit in exchange for performing a public duty is a crime.
Can you tell the difference?
A policeman stopping you from speeding and handing you a ticket which requires you to pay a $150 fine versus a policeman stopping you from speeding and demanding you pay $150 in cash to him personally on the spot or he will impound your car.
To Trumpettes those are the same quid pro quo.