- Thread starter
- #201
As 'to the points made; rebuttal of your talking points would be too sophisticated for this forum's audience.Wrong, oh so very wrong.
In 2008 Russia started testing the SSC-8 "SLINGSHOT" missile, which was in violation of the INF treaty.
In 2013 they started testing the SS-25 "SICKLE" and RD-26 Rubzh missiles. Both road mobile IRBMs that were in clear violation of the INF treaty. And the Russians pretty much said they were going to continue to ignore it as China was in no way bound to the restrictions. And the day the US pulled out of that treaty, the Russians announced they were already developing a land based launcher for the SS-N-27 "SIZZLER" missile.
Interestingly enough, since the US pulled out of that treaty in 2018 the most the US has done is test a new GLCM system in 2019. And there have been no further attempts in developing that platform since 2020 as the Army has no interest in fielding it.
Sorry, feel free to look into the timeline of the INF, that proves what you said is a lie.
I'll stick to the facts on America's ambitions on creating more Nato countries with the purpose of challenging Russia. Thereby furnishing proof of America's imperialism and its failure to honour agreements to not challenge Russia.
You can roll all your talking points into one argument that addresses that.
And keep it simple enough for our audience to understand.
For more specific talking points, see Robert Kennedy junior's explanations.