Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #81
Constitutionally speaking, you are really fucking ignorant of that founding document aren't you! Armed insurrection is not the logical path to redress grievances; the former is unconstitutional, unlawful and down right idiocy as a response to the latter. Swap the thumbs again!Surely that would depend on what was on the ballot paper ? Thats a given isnt it ?Instead of Violence
Communism and socialism, Read contends, are not ideologies that exist somewhere out there among foreigners and shady agents of conspiracy. In America, the ideas of communism and socialism are alive and well among the supporters of public schooling, social security, the post office, and other tools of the state. In the end, whoever contends that the use of force is the proper method to attain “social performance” is spreading the ideas of socialism and communism.
_ _______________
Do we then have a right to violently stand our ground against socialists, berners, fascists?
Indeed we do.
rightwinger and his ilk will claim that the berners have a right to impose a tax and the Taxpayers and producers have no option other than to meekly pay it.
I say BULLSHIT.
What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.
Thomas Jefferson
Are you trying to provoke people to an armed rebellion against a democratically elected government, if it was trying to adopt any social policies?
1- the purpose of voting is to elect a candidate
2- the purpose of voting is not so the majority acquire FDR Bill of Rights
3- the purpose of voting is not to overthrow capitalism, freedom and adopt socialism
1- the purpose of voting is to elect a candidate
2- the purpose of voting is not so the majority acquire FDR Bill of Rights
3- the purpose of voting is not to overthrow capitalism, freedom and adopt socialism
If you want to make the US a slave state you need a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
IF YOU WANT TO DO IT ANY OTHER WAY THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO STAND THEIR GROUND AND FILL YOU UP WITH LEAD
.
Constitutionally speaking, you are really fucking ignorant of that founding document aren't you!
Armed insurrection is the logical path to redress grievances when there is no judicial review.
The right of access to the courts is basic to our system of government, and it is well established today that it is one of the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. In Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 207 U.S. 142, 28 S. Ct. 34, 52 L. Ed. 143 (1907), the Supreme Court characterized this right of access in the following terms:
[28] The right to sue and defend in the courts is the alternative of force. In an organized society it is the right conservative of all other rights, and lies at the foundation of orderly government. It is one of the highest and most essential privileges of citizenship, and must be allowed by each state to the citizens of all other states to the precise extent that it is allowed to its own citizens. Equality of treatment in this respect is not left to depend upon comity between the states, but is granted and protected by the Federal Constitution.
[29] 207 U.S. at 148, 28 S. Ct. at 35
But Americans no longer have the right to sue the government to prevent the theft of lands.
Americans no longer have the right to sue judges for refusing to redress their grievances - judges claim to be immune from lawsuit.
So you do the math.