Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You recieve today's award for Unintentional Humor!
Idiots of a prior generaton shouted the same phrase...and would have used the same font if it had been available....
...with respect to Senator McCarthy and communism.
Same idiots, different time.
And, of course, the Right was proven correct in that case, as well.
So you are obviously upset w/ the Citizens United decision then?
Why the sudden change of subject?
What happed to the huge-font Soros post?
Have you, since, read my post and decided that there is good and valid reason to object to the views of Mr. Soros?
If not the case, are you prepared to support the items as I have oulined same?
Since you have pronounced my dislike of Soros' views a "boogaboo"....I assume you meant bugaboo....which implies that my discomfort with same is misplaced, would you care to outline your support of those views?
Or was your post as empty as your head appears to be?
There you go again. Red Herring alert. PC hopes to divert the thread and one more example of her dishonest character. Shame shame on you PC.
Since I was not the one who inserted Soros into the thread, your post is revealed as a simple-minded attempt to offer some undeserved criticism.
This has become your hallmark.
As a judgment about human nature, it is the sign of one who is envious, covetous of a certain ability that he lacks.
I hope to save you future embarrassment....as, I am sure, I am not the only one to see through your failed attempts.
My suggestion?
You should go back to the task for which you are better prepared, using silly putty to lift the comic page. Im sure somebody will open the egg for you.
Your nit-picking is excruciatingly tiresome.
Oh puhhhhleeeeze....They are trying to get him out and a liberal judge in before the health care bill comes up to the supreme court.
That's what this is all about.
Thomas will likely have to recuse himself from hearing the case on Obamacare due to his wife's activities in fighting it. (Kagan recently recused herself in a SC case because she ruled on it in a lower court.)
How ironic that would be. CT and his wife's partisan activities has hurt the right's chance of getting it overturned. That's funny, but Thomas was never the brightest bulb on the court. Hell, he doesn't even ask any questions. He just sits there like a mute.
Anita Hill was obviously telling the truth. We find out just a bit too late.
At the VERY least, there's an appearance of impropriety. In my experience, where there's smoke, there's fire.
So you are obviously upset w/ the Citizens United decision then?
Why the sudden change of subject?
What happed to the huge-font Soros post?
Have you, since, read my post and decided that there is good and valid reason to object to the views of Mr. Soros?
If not the case, are you prepared to support the items as I have oulined same?
Since you have pronounced my dislike of Soros' views a "boogaboo"....I assume you meant bugaboo....which implies that my discomfort with same is misplaced, would you care to outline your support of those views?
Or was your post as empty as your head appears to be?
My post had something to do w/ the Court whereas your's is.....how shall I say this.....way out in Right field The topic is C. Thomas
PC declares herself the winner. Typical Rightie-move.
As to the topic of Thomas and the fact that he WILL have to recuse himself due to his wife's activities w/ the T- party, it's a forgone conclusion
Anita Hill was obviously telling the truth. We find out just a bit too late.
Since I was not the one who inserted Soros into the thread, your post is revealed as a simple-minded attempt to offer some undeserved criticism.
This has become your hallmark.
As a judgment about human nature, it is the sign of one who is envious, covetous of a certain ability that he lacks.
I hope to save you future embarrassment....as, I am sure, I am not the only one to see through your failed attempts.
My suggestion?
You should go back to the task for which you are better prepared, using silly putty to lift the comic page. Im sure somebody will open the egg for you.
Your nit-picking is excruciatingly tiresome.
Your post appears to mean that you couldn't find any error in the logic of my post: I didn't bring up Soros, and Wry has no ability of his own...
But it was so charitable of you to rush to the defense of Wry-boy...
...where did you two meet, was it eHarmony?
To hell with Thomas and his drunk dialing wife. Let's just play their game. Time for George Soros to start throwing his scratch around. If these guys can be bought...why shouldn't he be one of the ones that can buy 'em? Equal opportunity!
Come on George, Sonia needs a new pair of shoes! How 'bout a Caddie for Ruth? Justice Kennedy looks like he could use some new golf clubs!
Please tell me that your post was tongue-in-cheek.
But if you seriously idolize this amoral millionaire, which of these do you agree with?
1. The Soros Prostitution Agenda. Open Society Institute (OSI), a foundation funded and controlled by George Soros, sued the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) ?over requirement that recipients of federal AIDS grants pledge to oppose prostitution. The group would be the second charity to challenge the policy, which AIDS activists say stigmatizes prostitutes and makes it harder to fight the disease.? In June 2006, Open Society Institute published a study entitled ?Sex Workers Health and Rights: Where is the Funding?? The report highlighted the role of OSI and various Soros foundations, in financing ?a large number of sex workers organizations? and attacked the Bush Administration policy for refusing to fund such groups. OSI received at least $30 million between 1998 and 2003 from the federal government, mostly from the State Department. (Wall Street Journal, September 23, 2005; Open Society Institute webpages, OSI Sues USAID over Dangerous Public Health Policy | Public Health Program | Open Society Foundations - OSF, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/he...cations/publications/where_20060719/where.pdf
2. Soros Helped Finance a Pro-Marijuana Children?s Book. ?Dr. Robert Newman, served on the Board of Directors for the Drug Policy Foundation as early as 1997, and presently serves on the board of directors with another minority witness, Rev. Edwin Sanders, of the Drug Policy Alliance (the new name of the Drug Policy Foundation since its merger with the aforementioned Lindesmith Center). The Drug Policy Alliance describes itself as ?the nation?s leading organization working to end the war on drugs.? Along with its major donor George Soros, it helped produce It?s Just a Plant, a pro-marijuana children?s book. I will be very interested in learning from the witnesses today what they believe U.S. Government policy should be with respect to financing heroin distribution, safe-injection facilities, and how-to manuals like H Is For Heroin, published by the Harm Reduction Coalition, and children?s books on smoking marijuana, produced with the help of the organization run by two of the minority?s witnesses today.? (Mark Souder, opening statement, ?Harm Reduction or Harm Maintenance: Is There Such a Thing as Safe Drug Abuse??, hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources, February 16, 2005, http://www.dpna.org/resources/current/02-16-5c.htm)
3. Soros is Major Financier Behind Drug Legalization Groups. In 1994, Soros pledged $4 million over five years to the Lindesmith Center, a pro-marijuana legalization think-tank that merged with the Drug Policy Foundation to form the Drug Policy Alliance, which supports legalization of marijuana for ?medical? purposes, repealing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, ending imprisonment for drug possession. (Neil Hrab, ?George Soros? Social Agenda for America,? Capital Research Center?s Foundation Watch, http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/x3770435801.pdf)
4. Soros Support of Lynne Stewart, lawyer to terrorists. ?George Soros funds many controversial projects, some extreme projects. One quick example is the $20,000 that went from his Open Society Institute to the Lynne Stewart Legal Committee. Lynne Stewart was the attorney who represented the blind sheik who was involved in the first bombing of the World Trade Centers and was later convicted for aiding and abetting his activities while in prison.? (Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center, O?Reilly Factor, May 20, 2005, relying on Open Society Institute IRS Form 990 filings. Byron York, ?Soros Funded Stewart Defense,? National Review, February 17, 2005)
Soros Monitor
All of the above make America a better place?
Your nit-picking is excruciatingly tiresome.
Your post appears to mean that you couldn't find any error in the logic of my post: I didn't bring up Soros, and Wry has no ability of his own...
But it was so charitable of you to rush to the defense of Wry-boy...
...where did you two meet, was it eHarmony?
Keep digging PC, the more you whine, the more pitful you appear.
To hell with Thomas and his drunk dialing wife. Let's just play their game. Time for George Soros to start throwing his scratch around. If these guys can be bought...why shouldn't he be one of the ones that can buy 'em? Equal opportunity!
Come on George, Sonia needs a new pair of shoes! How 'bout a Caddie for Ruth? Justice Kennedy looks like he could use some new golf clubs!
Please tell me that your post was tongue-in-cheek.
But if you seriously idolize this amoral millionaire, which of these do you agree with?
1. The Soros Prostitution Agenda. Open Society Institute (OSI), a foundation funded and controlled by George Soros, sued the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) ?over requirement that recipients of federal AIDS grants pledge to oppose prostitution. The group would be the second charity to challenge the policy, which AIDS activists say stigmatizes prostitutes and makes it harder to fight the disease.? In June 2006, Open Society Institute published a study entitled ?Sex Workers Health and Rights: Where is the Funding?? The report highlighted the role of OSI and various Soros foundations, in financing ?a large number of sex workers organizations? and attacked the Bush Administration policy for refusing to fund such groups. OSI received at least $30 million between 1998 and 2003 from the federal government, mostly from the State Department. (Wall Street Journal, September 23, 2005; Open Society Institute webpages, OSI Sues USAID over Dangerous Public Health Policy | Public Health Program | Open Society Foundations - OSF, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/he...cations/publications/where_20060719/where.pdf
2. Soros Helped Finance a Pro-Marijuana Children?s Book. ?Dr. Robert Newman, served on the Board of Directors for the Drug Policy Foundation as early as 1997, and presently serves on the board of directors with another minority witness, Rev. Edwin Sanders, of the Drug Policy Alliance (the new name of the Drug Policy Foundation since its merger with the aforementioned Lindesmith Center). The Drug Policy Alliance describes itself as ?the nation?s leading organization working to end the war on drugs.? Along with its major donor George Soros, it helped produce It?s Just a Plant, a pro-marijuana children?s book. I will be very interested in learning from the witnesses today what they believe U.S. Government policy should be with respect to financing heroin distribution, safe-injection facilities, and how-to manuals like H Is For Heroin, published by the Harm Reduction Coalition, and children?s books on smoking marijuana, produced with the help of the organization run by two of the minority?s witnesses today.? (Mark Souder, opening statement, ?Harm Reduction or Harm Maintenance: Is There Such a Thing as Safe Drug Abuse??, hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources, February 16, 2005, http://www.dpna.org/resources/current/02-16-5c.htm)
3. Soros is Major Financier Behind Drug Legalization Groups. In 1994, Soros pledged $4 million over five years to the Lindesmith Center, a pro-marijuana legalization think-tank that merged with the Drug Policy Foundation to form the Drug Policy Alliance, which supports legalization of marijuana for ?medical? purposes, repealing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, ending imprisonment for drug possession. (Neil Hrab, ?George Soros? Social Agenda for America,? Capital Research Center?s Foundation Watch, http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/x3770435801.pdf)
4. Soros Support of Lynne Stewart, lawyer to terrorists. ?George Soros funds many controversial projects, some extreme projects. One quick example is the $20,000 that went from his Open Society Institute to the Lynne Stewart Legal Committee. Lynne Stewart was the attorney who represented the blind sheik who was involved in the first bombing of the World Trade Centers and was later convicted for aiding and abetting his activities while in prison.? (Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center, O?Reilly Factor, May 20, 2005, relying on Open Society Institute IRS Form 990 filings. Byron York, ?Soros Funded Stewart Defense,? National Review, February 17, 2005)
Soros Monitor
All of the above make America a better place?
No, it wasn't tongue in cheek and your BS about George Soros notwithstanding, if righties want to cheer the horrible Citizens United, I think the liberals should get on board. Why should the right wing corporate masters like the Koch brothers and all the little Koch Suckers, be the only ones to profit from these right wing rulings? Go Union and Soros $$...buy US some politicians like the right wing does.
Your post appears to mean that you couldn't find any error in the logic of my post: I didn't bring up Soros, and Wry has no ability of his own...
But it was so charitable of you to rush to the defense of Wry-boy...
...where did you two meet, was it eHarmony?
Keep digging PC, the more you whine, the more pitful you appear.
I don't whine....I just slap you around.
They are trying to get him out and a liberal judge in before the health care bill comes up to the supreme court.
That's what this is all about.
Thomas will likely have to recuse himself from hearing the case on Obamacare due to his wife's activities in fighting it. (Kagan recently recused herself in a SC case because she ruled on it in a lower court.)
How ironic that would be. CT and his wife's partisan activities has hurt the right's chance of getting it overturned. That's funny, but Thomas was never the brightest bulb on the court. Hell, he doesn't even ask any questions. He just sits there like a mute.
Keep digging PC, the more you whine, the more pitful you appear.
I don't whine....I just slap you around.
Really, how's that working out for you? (pssssst, between you and me not at all)
I recall a few democrat votes were for sale during obamacare.