i dont see that ….How about what’s been written on his sash and robes? I’ve seen Latin that when taking away Roman Numerals leaves Satan
and Latin is not satanic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
i dont see that ….How about what’s been written on his sash and robes? I’ve seen Latin that when taking away Roman Numerals leaves Satan
Who said Latin is Satanic? Reading comprehension difficulties today?i dont see that ….
and Latin is not satanic
The Catholic Church is the counterfeit church to the Church of Jesus Christ.
I've known about this for a long time. There are other things the Pope has worn that suggests he is.
I've known about this for a long time. There are other things the Pope has worn that suggests he is.
Why do you think it’s a conspiracy? This is quite factual. You see the crowns and the writings on the crown. 666.
i dont see that ….
and Latin is not satanic
I agree that there was no Pope in the 1st century. Nero is not the beast. Revelation is about the last days.
I agree that there was no Pope in the 1st century. Nero is not the beast. Revelation is about the last days.
You are reading from your own anti-revelation and prophecy scholars. Had nothing to do with Caesar. It was a last day revelation.Difficult Passage: The Mark of the Beast – Providence Christian Church
providencechristiannm.com
The word “mark” in Greek is charagma, and it had two meanings in the first century AD. It could either refer to the image of a Caesar stamped on the minted coins of the Roman Empire, or it could refer to the seal of the Caesar on official documents (Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 3rd ed., 462). This sheds light on two possible interpretations of the mark of the beast.
You are reading from your own anti-revelation and prophecy scholars. Had nothing to do with Caesar. It was a last day revelation.
That doesn’t mean what he was writing about had anything to do with Caesar or anything during that time. If it did, the world would have ended with the Millennium, judgment and resurrection already have taken place. That ends that.Revelation tells you that it's a letter to the 7 churches. Who do you think the letter was written to?
That doesn’t mean what he was writing about had anything to do with Caesar or anything during that time. If it did, the world would have ended with the Millennium, judgment and resurrection already have taken place. That ends that.
John wasn’t Jewish anymore. He was a Christian. There is nothing written in Revelation that suggests that. It was the end of the world and end of Satan. It was about how we should live with Christ in our hearts as the world itself ends and the Millennium begins with New Jerusalem with Christ the government on his shoulders.It was the end of temple Judaism and the world as they knew it.
It’s not a Jewish book. Therefore, you are wrong as usual. Jews today are also wrong.It's common to think of prophecy as predictions, but to an Jewish mind prophecy is primarily a proclamation of previously known truth, a call to return and not to forget the important matters.
The Book of Revelation can be called an apocalyptic letter containing prophecy, combining at least three genres in one document (apocalyptic, epistolary and prophetic)
It’s not a Jewish book. Therefore, you are wrong as usual. Jews today are also wrong.
John wasn’t Jewish anymore. He was a Christian. There is nothing written in Revelation that suggests that. It was the end of the world and end of Satan. It was about how we should live with Christ in our hearts as the world itself ends and the Millennium begins with New Jerusalem with Christ the government on his shoulders.
All the same guy. The Apostle JohnI don't think John of Patmos was the disciple John.
The great "tribulation” was the persecution under Nero and Christ’s vengeance upon his enemies.