Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,423
- 4,218
- 208
- Thread starter
- #61
I don’t confuse anyone. But you certainly are confused.Now you're confusing Hezekiah with Jesus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t confuse anyone. But you certainly are confused.Now you're confusing Hezekiah with Jesus.
All the same guy. The Apostle John
That’s only a matter of translation which is faulty on its own. John is attributed of it and if you don’t have concrete evidence otherwise then stop rumormongering. John wrote all the John books.Probably not. In the gospel John doesn't identify himself as the author. ... and his Greek is perfect. John of Patmos identifies himself as author and your brother in tribulation...and his Greek is full of errors.
That’s only a matter of translation which is faulty on its own. John is attributed of it and if you don’t have concrete evidence otherwise then stop rumormongering. John wrote all the John books.
I don’t give a rats ass about your scholars. They are all frauds. You do know as people get older their vocabulary changes. Their word usage changes. Even their dialects often change too. Even styles often change as well. I look at my journals from when I was in my early 20’s through now and I can’t recognize my own early writing. John wrote all of the books of John including Revelation.Scholars disagree because there's so much difference in writing styles.
I don’t give a rats ass about your scholars. They are all frauds. You do know as people get older their vocabulary changes. Their word usage changes. Even their dialects often change too. Even styles often change as well. I look at my journals from when I was in my early 20’s through now and I can’t recognize my own early writing. John wrote all of the books of John including Revelation.
I guess the best will be to throw the book revelation out of the bible.
It's always been controversial.
Pope is not and will never be the anti-christ. Stop listening to TBN BS.Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
I've known about this for a long time. There are other things the Pope has worn that suggests he is.
Such claims about the Pope are stupid and irresponsible ..based in ignorance of scripture and history .Pope is not and will never be the anti-christ. Stop listening to TBN BS.
All yours are
I am a nowist.Are you a futurist, hobelim?
I am a nowist.
Now that you know he’s 666, he is the real deceiver.
I gave you the link to the fact that Popes have worn that crown of 666 for a very long time. I've never watched TBN.Pope is not and will never be the anti-christ. Stop listening to TBN BS.
No he's not. Stop repeating the lie. It never names Nero as the beast. And, the Lord Jesus Christ did not and has not returned yet for His 2nd coming. So, it's not Nero.In Revelation the beast is the emperor Nero who is also the antichrist.
Yes it does. Hebrew numerology spells Cesar Nero. Why do you think John wrote it in code? The entire book of Revelation is apocalyptic in nature using Hebrew apocalyptic language that the first century Jewish Christians would absolutely understand. John and Daniel were not writing to some future audience that would spend more than a century to trying to decipher the "code". In fact, if you lived in the first century during the Roman occupation and the reign of Nero, you would absolutely understand the "Code" because Daniel and John were writing directly to you.No he's not. Stop repeating the lie. It never names Nero as the beast. And, the Lord Jesus Christ did not and has not returned yet for His 2nd coming. So, it's not Nero.
Bravo! Well done.Yes it does. Hebrew numerology spells Cesar Nero. Why do you think John wrote it in code? The entire book of Revelation is apocalyptic in nature using Hebrew apocalyptic language that the first century Jewish Christians would absolutely understand. John and Daniel were not writing to some future audience that would spend more than a century to trying to decipher the "code". In fact, if you lived in the first century during the Roman occupation and the reign of Nero, you would absolutely understand the "Code" because Daniel and John were writing directly to you.
John Darby and his hermeneutic of dispensationalism has wreaked havoc on western and modern Christianity for far too long.