colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
Still just name calling and zero substance.thats thats some real projection,,,They will use anything as an excuse to believe whatever it is they wanted to believe.They will point to one person who wore an N95 mask, and still got infected as proof that masks don't work. And that people shouldn't even bother protecting themselves at all.But this point raises a larger issue. What conclusions do you want me to draw from a handful of erroneous data in a pool of hundreds of thousands?
The answer is none. Errors happen, no one is perfect, but they’re minimal and has little actual effect on the data.
As they say, the perfect is the enemy of the good.
It’s very hard to be objective about data and no one is 100% perfect but some are far better than others.
This thread is an example of that. The CDC is being objective about what vaccination data tells is. They’re not putting their desires ahead of what is actually known. This can be hard for people who don’t have a background in science to understand, the length you have to go before you can actually say you know something. Most people are used to just saying whatever they want. Scientists and doctors can’t just do that. Not without damaging themselves and their field.