Is the US to blame for all of Cuba's ills?

[pknopp]

It's all from the same place. Thin air.

Money from the US Treasury is raised by selling Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes.
Not thin air.

With money created out of thin air.

None of the Treasuries I own were bought with money created out of thin air.

It's all created that way. But you know this.

 

[kaz]

People suffered for 60 years but you felt good.

I don't feel good that the Cuban people have suffered under Communism for 60 years.

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Yes, funding the government helps them oppress the people.

Which is the exact reason that the families and friends of the people in Cuba who got here have supported sanctions all that time.

Think about it, the government doesn't pass money to the people, they take it and buy weapons and oppress the people.

You sound like someone who doesn't think Venezuela prints money. Oh yeah, you are ...

 

[Rigby5]

Nonsense.
Individual corruption is what harmed Venezuela, and socialism had nothing at all to do with it.
The US also illegally caused a great deal of harm.
Most of the world is socialist, and all the good parts of the US are, like public transportation, education, social security, disability, ADC, food stamps, unemployment compensation, etc.

hahaha that's the problem isn't it? people are corrupt, people aren't angels....socialism just allows for it to flow widely, and always ends with the vast majority poor, and eating dogs.

China, USSR, Venezula, Cuba, Vietnam, every nation that has adopted Socialism.

Why do you think people being unemployment and getting UE benefits, and food stamps is a good part of America? I think it's horrible...we need less of it, and more people working.

Wrong.
China, USSR, Venezuela, Cuba were Stalinist, which is state capitalism.
Nothing socialist about them.
You can't have anything collaborative, cooperative, and communal without also being democratic.
Vietnam was not so Stalinist I believe.

Social welfare programs are always going to be temporary needs.
Without them you will have far more desperation and crime.
So they are always good to have as back up.
Without government, we would have far less work, such as no internet.
No private company could have invested what the internet took.

hahaa State Capitalism is socialism. It’s just another way to brand it that socialist came up with the deflect from the harms of socialism

The Govt owns the means and production. That’s socialism.

Social programs like welfare aren’t socialism…they don’t work the best, but they aren’t socialism

There is no difference between government "owning" the means of production and controlling it.

Yes, redistribution of wealth is a socialist policy. That alone doesn't make a government entirely socialist, but government is raping producers, that directly impacts the means of production and forces them into supporting government social policy

The National Socialist Hitler perfected the modern day socialist approach to controlling corporations.

He said, "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?" Hitler understood that bureaucrats can't even run government efficiently, let alone corporations. The only issue is controlling what those corporations do or do not do. Just let the experts be experts and mind your own business, unless you need them for something or need them to stop something. But the old style socialists like Cuba and North Korea still don't get it.

Hitler was an anti-socialist appointed Chancellor by the wealthy elite, in order to murder all the socialists and communists.
He never controlled any corporation except Junkers, whose CEO refused to support the war.
Military contracts were awarded on a capitalist bidding scheme just like the US now.

When you need to control people you just lie and claim there is some sort of threat, like Saddam having tons of anthrax and weeks away from nuclear weapons.

Hitler was a socialist...he formed his own socialist party, the National Socialist, and killed any threat to his power. He then took control over all private industry, and allowed some to remain, so long as they only worked for the good of the state. That's what Facsism is all about.

Wrong.
Earnst Rohem started the SA, (Sturm Abteilung) with vets unhappy with their being ignored after WWI.
He then started the National Socialists are an anti communist and anti socialist party because that is what "nationalist" means.
It mean anti whatever comes next.
Hitler was never a socialist and never started any political party.
He was poor and stupid.
Hitler took control over nothing.
The wealthy elite oligarchy was looking for a good talker and finally decided on Hitler, but only if he ditched the SA, so he killed them all.
Hitler controlled no businesses and socialized nothing.
Hitler worked for the oligarchs, did only what they told him to do, and it was always only the wealthy elite, the aristorcracy, banks, corporations, and military, who were in control.
Hitler was more of a patsy who they could later use to take the blame.

Fascism is never about socialism.
Fascism was created by ancient Rome, using the fascia that was the axe handle symbol of office of the lictors, that showed strength in unity by being tied together in bundles, as a representation of the strength of collaboration of the oligarchs.

 

[Rigby5]

It's all from the same place. Thin air.

Money from the US Treasury is raised by selling Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes.
Not thin air.

All those things have to be paid back, with interest, so are not sources of income.

 

[surada]

Nonsense.
Individual corruption is what harmed Venezuela, and socialism had nothing at all to do with it.
The US also illegally caused a great deal of harm.
Most of the world is socialist, and all the good parts of the US are, like public transportation, education, social security, disability, ADC, food stamps, unemployment compensation, etc.

hahaha that's the problem isn't it? people are corrupt, people aren't angels....socialism just allows for it to flow widely, and always ends with the vast majority poor, and eating dogs.

China, USSR, Venezula, Cuba, Vietnam, every nation that has adopted Socialism.

Why do you think people being unemployment and getting UE benefits, and food stamps is a good part of America? I think it's horrible...we need less of it, and more people working.

Wrong.
China, USSR, Venezuela, Cuba were Stalinist, which is state capitalism.
Nothing socialist about them.
You can't have anything collaborative, cooperative, and communal without also being democratic.
Vietnam was not so Stalinist I believe.

Social welfare programs are always going to be temporary needs.
Without them you will have far more desperation and crime.
So they are always good to have as back up.
Without government, we would have far less work, such as no internet.
No private company could have invested what the internet took.

hahaa State Capitalism is socialism. It’s just another way to brand it that socialist came up with the deflect from the harms of socialism

The Govt owns the means and production. That’s socialism.

Social programs like welfare aren’t socialism…they don’t work the best, but they aren’t socialism

There is no difference between government "owning" the means of production and controlling it.

Yes, redistribution of wealth is a socialist policy. That alone doesn't make a government entirely socialist, but government is raping producers, that directly impacts the means of production and forces them into supporting government social policy

The National Socialist Hitler perfected the modern day socialist approach to controlling corporations.

He said, "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?" Hitler understood that bureaucrats can't even run government efficiently, let alone corporations. The only issue is controlling what those corporations do or do not do. Just let the experts be experts and mind your own business, unless you need them for something or need them to stop something. But the old style socialists like Cuba and North Korea still don't get it.

Hitler was an anti-socialist appointed Chancellor by the wealthy elite, in order to murder all the socialists and communists.
He never controlled any corporation except Junkers, whose CEO refused to support the war.
Military contracts were awarded on a capitalist bidding scheme just like the US now.

When you need to control people you just lie and claim there is some sort of threat, like Saddam having tons of anthrax and weeks away from nuclear weapons.

Hitler was a socialist...he formed his own socialist party, the National Socialist, and killed any threat to his power. He then took control over all private industry, and allowed some to remain, so long as they only worked for the good of the state. That's what Facsism is all about.

Wrong.
Earnst Rohem started the SA, (Sturm Abteilung) with vets unhappy with their being ignored after WWI.
He then started the National Socialists are an anti communist and anti socialist party because that is what "nationalist" means.
It mean anti whatever comes next.
Hitler was never a socialist and never started any political party.
He was poor and stupid.
Hitler took control over nothing.
The wealthy elite oligarchy was looking for a good talker and finally decided on Hitler, but only if he ditched the SA, so he killed them all.
Hitler controlled no businesses and socialized nothing.
Hitler worked for the oligarchs, did only what they told him to do, and it was always only the wealthy elite, the aristorcracy, banks, corporations, and military, who were in control.
Hitler was more of a patsy who they could later use to take the blame.

Fascism is never about socialism.
Fascism was created by ancient Rome, using the fascia that was the axe handle symbol of office of the lictors, that showed strength in unity by being tied together in bundles, as a representation of the strength of collaboration of the oligarchs.

Wasn't the SA the biggest party in Germany from about 1916 to 1932?

 

[Leo123]

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Why doesn't Russia help them? How about some of the other socialist countries?

Also, in Cuba, health care and education are free and there is subsidized food. These services come at a high cost which limits the revenue available to the central government. Sadly the country cut its own throat when they decided to drop America in favor of the USSR but then the USSR fell apart and they both disappeared on Cuba's economic horizon.

 

[Votto]

Nonsense.
Individual corruption is what harmed Venezuela, and socialism had nothing at all to do with it.
The US also illegally caused a great deal of harm.
Most of the world is socialist, and all the good parts of the US are, like public transportation, education, social security, disability, ADC, food stamps, unemployment compensation, etc.

hahaha that's the problem isn't it? people are corrupt, people aren't angels....socialism just allows for it to flow widely, and always ends with the vast majority poor, and eating dogs.

China, USSR, Venezula, Cuba, Vietnam, every nation that has adopted Socialism.

Why do you think people being unemployment and getting UE benefits, and food stamps is a good part of America? I think it's horrible...we need less of it, and more people working.

Wrong.
China, USSR, Venezuela, Cuba were Stalinist, which is state capitalism.
Nothing socialist about them.
You can't have anything collaborative, cooperative, and communal without also being democratic.
Vietnam was not so Stalinist I believe.

Social welfare programs are always going to be temporary needs.
Without them you will have far more desperation and crime.
So they are always good to have as back up.
Without government, we would have far less work, such as no internet.
No private company could have invested what the internet took.

hahaa State Capitalism is socialism. It’s just another way to brand it that socialist came up with the deflect from the harms of socialism

The Govt owns the means and production. That’s socialism.

Social programs like welfare aren’t socialism…they don’t work the best, but they aren’t socialism

There is no difference between government "owning" the means of production and controlling it.

Yes, redistribution of wealth is a socialist policy. That alone doesn't make a government entirely socialist, but government is raping producers, that directly impacts the means of production and forces them into supporting government social policy

The National Socialist Hitler perfected the modern day socialist approach to controlling corporations.

He said, "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?" Hitler understood that bureaucrats can't even run government efficiently, let alone corporations. The only issue is controlling what those corporations do or do not do. Just let the experts be experts and mind your own business, unless you need them for something or need them to stop something. But the old style socialists like Cuba and North Korea still don't get it.

Hitler was an anti-socialist appointed Chancellor by the wealthy elite, in order to murder all the socialists and communists.
He never controlled any corporation except Junkers, whose CEO refused to support the war.
Military contracts were awarded on a capitalist bidding scheme just like the US now.

When you need to control people you just lie and claim there is some sort of threat, like Saddam having tons of anthrax and weeks away from nuclear weapons.

Hitler was a socialist...he formed his own socialist party, the National Socialist, and killed any threat to his power. He then took control over all private industry, and allowed some to remain, so long as they only worked for the good of the state. That's what Facsism is all about.

Wrong.
Earnst Rohem started the SA, (Sturm Abteilung) with vets unhappy with their being ignored after WWI.
He then started the National Socialists are an anti communist and anti socialist party because that is what "nationalist" means.
It mean anti whatever comes next.
Hitler was never a socialist and never started any political party.
He was poor and stupid.
Hitler took control over nothing.
The wealthy elite oligarchy was looking for a good talker and finally decided on Hitler, but only if he ditched the SA, so he killed them all.
Hitler controlled no businesses and socialized nothing.
Hitler worked for the oligarchs, did only what they told him to do, and it was always only the wealthy elite, the aristorcracy, banks, corporations, and military, who were in control.
Hitler was more of a patsy who they could later use to take the blame.

Fascism is never about socialism.
Fascism was created by ancient Rome, using the fascia that was the axe handle symbol of office of the lictors, that showed strength in unity by being tied together in bundles, as a representation of the strength of collaboration of the oligarchs.

So the party that named themselves National Socialists hated Socialists?

LOL.

Joseph Paul Goebbels
As socialists, we are opponents of the Jews, because we see, in the Hebrews, the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods.

If only you could erase all of history

If only.

ISIS and the Left statue hating populace are trying, so A for effort.

And who does this sound like today?

National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI),
We ask that government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within the confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: ... an end to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand ... the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education.... We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents.... The government must undertake the improvement of public health -- by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor -- by the greatest possible support for all groups concerned with the physical education of youth. [W]e combat the ... materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good

 

[pknopp]

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Why doesn't Russia help them? How about some of the other socialist countries?

Also, in Cuba, health care and education is free and there is subsidized food. These services come at a high cost which limits the revenue available to the central government. Sadly the country cut its own throat when they decided to drop America in favor of the USSR and the both disappeared on Cuba's economic horizon.

Russia, Russia, Russia. Does it never get old? What other countries do should not dictate what we do. As a "Christian" nation we should simply want to help people struggling. It's what we are instructed to do.

All you (and many others) only care about is your stupid politics and screw people when they get in the way.

 

[surada]

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Why doesn't Russia help them? How about some of the other socialist countries?

Also, in Cuba, health care and education are free and there is subsidized food. These services come at a high cost which limits the revenue available to the central government. Sadly the country cut its own throat when they decided to drop America in favor of the USSR and the both disappeared on Cuba's economic horizon.

The US bought all of Cuba's sugar crop for decades.. When the US Sugar beet lobby got involved we stopped and the USSR started buying all their Sugar. The Cubans had no choice. Sugar was their biggest crop.

 

[Rigby5]

where did Bush do that?

the law at the time said US businesses couldn’t do business with Cuba. Bush didn’t make the law.

Yes Trump put sanctions back on Cuba after they backed the oppressive dictator of Venezuela

And properly so. That is the proper response to a nation that is an oppressive monster to it's own people
and tries to aid another dictator/butcher, Hugo Chavez, in Venezuela spread socialist misery to other nations.

Actually what Chavez did with Petro Caribe was pretty smart.

Face facts, Socialism destroyed Venezuela... it's a cancer that's never worked....and never will.
A failed economic platform

Nonsense.
Individual corruption is what harmed Venezuela, and socialism had nothing at all to do with it.
The US also illegally caused a great deal of harm.
Most of the world is socialist, and all the good parts of the US are, like public transportation, education, social security, disability, ADC, food stamps, unemployment compensation, etc.

hahaha that's the problem isn't it? people are corrupt, people aren't angels....socialism just allows for it to flow widely, and always ends with the vast majority poor, and eating dogs.

China, USSR, Venezula, Cuba, Vietnam, every nation that has adopted Socialism.

Why do you think people being unemployment and getting UE benefits, and food stamps is a good part of America? I think it's horrible...we need less of it, and more people working.

Wrong.
China, USSR, Venezuela, Cuba were Stalinist, which is state capitalism.
Nothing socialist about them.
You can't have anything collaborative, cooperative, and communal without also being democratic.
Vietnam was not so Stalinist I believe.

Social welfare programs are always going to be temporary needs.
Without them you will have far more desperation and crime.
So they are always good to have as back up.
Without government, we would have far less work, such as no internet.
No private company could have invested what the internet took.

hahaa State Capitalism is socialism. It’s just another way to brand it that socialist came up with the deflect from the harms of socialism

The Govt owns the means and production. That’s socialism.

Social programs like welfare aren’t socialism…they don’t work the best, but they aren’t socialism

Wrong.
Socialism is where the people have economic freedom, not imposed government control.
State capitalism is identical to feudalism or any ancient tyrannical monarchy, which clearly is not at all socialist.
Govt owning means of production is NOT at all socialism.
Its only when the people own the means of production that you be assured it is socialism.
(but there are also many other ways to create socialism.)
Govt control or ownership is always the definition of capitalism, because it is not owned by the people and instead is profit motivated for a wealthy elite.
Its who benefits that matters.
And yes, social welfare programs are socialism because they help in hard times, so prevent people from being dictated to under pressure.

hahaha Socialism is not when the people have economic freedom...that is capitalism.

Definition of SOCIALISM

any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods; a system of society or group living in which there is no private property… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

There is no economic freedom in Socialism, the individual has no right to even own anything, it all belongs to the State.

Wrong.
Here is the actual dictionary definition of socialism, and you will note that all it requires is government REGULATION, not ownership.

{...
socialism
[ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]

NOUN

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
   ...}
   
   
   
   
   

   definition of socialism - Bing

   Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

   www.bing.com

 

[gipper]

where did Bush do that?

the law at the time said US businesses couldn’t do business with Cuba. Bush didn’t make the law.

Yes Trump put sanctions back on Cuba after they backed the oppressive dictator of Venezuela

And properly so. That is the proper response to a nation that is an oppressive monster to it's own people
and tries to aid another dictator/butcher, Hugo Chavez, in Venezuela spread socialist misery to other nations.

Actually what Chavez did with Petro Caribe was pretty smart.

Face facts, Socialism destroyed Venezuela... it's a cancer that's never worked....and never will.
A failed economic platform

We are Venezuela without the ability to just print money and that isn't going to last forever.

What are you talking about? Your party is printing trillions. Why do you think inflation is getting out of control?

How can you post that when war criminal W and dumb Don just blew up the national debt? WTF?????

That's why I didn't vote Republican for six out of seven elections from 1992 to 2016. How many times did you vote Republican then?

Let's focus on W and Trump. I voted for Trump once in 2020. I didn't vote for W either time. You?

Yet you claim the D party is printing trillions. WTF?

That's all you were trying to say?

How many trillion has the Democrat party spent and how much are they trying to spend?

The Republican party sucks. But they aren't spending on the same scale as Democrats. Do you ever read anything but Communism Today?

Biden is up to six trillion in six months in SURPLUS spending. Not even counting just the regular spending. The Federal government takes in about four trillion a year. That is unprecedented spending.

But hey, you have Democrat propaganda to keep spreading, sorry for getting in the way

thinking there is a difference in spending behavior by the two criminal gangs, is an example of propaganda working.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

People suffered for 60 years but you felt good.

I don't feel good that the Cuban people have suffered under Communism for 60 years.

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Yup, I'm fine with putting sanctions on oppressive governments.

 

[kaz]

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Why doesn't Russia help them? How about some of the other socialist countries?

Also, in Cuba, health care and education is free and there is subsidized food. These services come at a high cost which limits the revenue available to the central government. Sadly the country cut its own throat when they decided to drop America in favor of the USSR and the both disappeared on Cuba's economic horizon.

Russia, Russia, Russia. Does it never get old? What other countries do should not dictate what we do. As a "Christian" nation we should simply want to help people struggling. It's what we are instructed to do.

All you (and many others) only care about is your stupid politics and screw people when they get in the way.

That's hilarious. You chanted Russia, Russia, Russia for four years. Now you're over it suddenly. Hmmm, I wonder why? LOL. New President? Close. New party. Bam, that's it. You're so shallow

 

[surada]

Nonsense.
Individual corruption is what harmed Venezuela, and socialism had nothing at all to do with it.
The US also illegally caused a great deal of harm.
Most of the world is socialist, and all the good parts of the US are, like public transportation, education, social security, disability, ADC, food stamps, unemployment compensation, etc.

hahaha that's the problem isn't it? people are corrupt, people aren't angels....socialism just allows for it to flow widely, and always ends with the vast majority poor, and eating dogs.

China, USSR, Venezula, Cuba, Vietnam, every nation that has adopted Socialism.

Why do you think people being unemployment and getting UE benefits, and food stamps is a good part of America? I think it's horrible...we need less of it, and more people working.

Wrong.
China, USSR, Venezuela, Cuba were Stalinist, which is state capitalism.
Nothing socialist about them.
You can't have anything collaborative, cooperative, and communal without also being democratic.
Vietnam was not so Stalinist I believe.

Social welfare programs are always going to be temporary needs.
Without them you will have far more desperation and crime.
So they are always good to have as back up.
Without government, we would have far less work, such as no internet.
No private company could have invested what the internet took.

hahaa State Capitalism is socialism. It’s just another way to brand it that socialist came up with the deflect from the harms of socialism

The Govt owns the means and production. That’s socialism.

Social programs like welfare aren’t socialism…they don’t work the best, but they aren’t socialism

There is no difference between government "owning" the means of production and controlling it.

Yes, redistribution of wealth is a socialist policy. That alone doesn't make a government entirely socialist, but government is raping producers, that directly impacts the means of production and forces them into supporting government social policy

The National Socialist Hitler perfected the modern day socialist approach to controlling corporations.

He said, "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?" Hitler understood that bureaucrats can't even run government efficiently, let alone corporations. The only issue is controlling what those corporations do or do not do. Just let the experts be experts and mind your own business, unless you need them for something or need them to stop something. But the old style socialists like Cuba and North Korea still don't get it.

Hitler was an anti-socialist appointed Chancellor by the wealthy elite, in order to murder all the socialists and communists.
He never controlled any corporation except Junkers, whose CEO refused to support the war.
Military contracts were awarded on a capitalist bidding scheme just like the US now.

When you need to control people you just lie and claim there is some sort of threat, like Saddam having tons of anthrax and weeks away from nuclear weapons.

Hitler was a socialist...he formed his own socialist party, the National Socialist, and killed any threat to his power. He then took control over all private industry, and allowed some to remain, so long as they only worked for the good of the state. That's what Facsism is all about.

Wrong.
Earnst Rohem started the SA, (Sturm Abteilung) with vets unhappy with their being ignored after WWI.
He then started the National Socialists are an anti communist and anti socialist party because that is what "nationalist" means.
It mean anti whatever comes next.
Hitler was never a socialist and never started any political party.
He was poor and stupid.
Hitler took control over nothing.
The wealthy elite oligarchy was looking for a good talker and finally decided on Hitler, but only if he ditched the SA, so he killed them all.
Hitler controlled no businesses and socialized nothing.
Hitler worked for the oligarchs, did only what they told him to do, and it was always only the wealthy elite, the aristorcracy, banks, corporations, and military, who were in control.
Hitler was more of a patsy who they could later use to take the blame.

Fascism is never about socialism.
Fascism was created by ancient Rome, using the fascia that was the axe handle symbol of office of the lictors, that showed strength in unity by being tied together in bundles, as a representation of the strength of collaboration of the oligarchs.

So the party that named themselves National Socialists hated Socialists?

LOL.

Joseph Paul Goebbels
As socialists, we are opponents of the Jews, because we see, in the Hebrews, the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods.

If only you could erase all of history

If only.

ISIS and the Left statue hating populace are trying, so A for effort.

You might want a date on the Goebbel's quote. Hitler broke with the socialists in 1926 .. Most Jews were Socialists or Democrats and many were Communists.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's all from the same place. Thin air.

Money from the US Treasury is raised by selling Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes.
Not thin air.

With money created out of thin air.

None of the Treasuries I own were bought with money created out of thin air.

It's all created that way. But you know this.

The money I used to buy Treasuries was from my savings.
I did not create it out of thin air. Sorry.

 

[surada]

People suffered for 60 years but you felt good.

I don't feel good that the Cuban people have suffered under Communism for 60 years.

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

Yup, I'm fine with putting sanctions on oppressive governments.

How does it help oppressed people?

 

[kaz]

That's why I didn't vote Republican for six out of seven elections from 1992 to 2016. How many times did you vote Republican then?

Let's focus on W and Trump. I voted for Trump once in 2020. I didn't vote for W either time. You?

Yet you claim the D party is printing trillions. WTF?

That's all you were trying to say?

How many trillion has the Democrat party spent and how much are they trying to spend?

The Republican party sucks. But they aren't spending on the same scale as Democrats. Do you ever read anything but Communism Today?

Biden is up to six trillion in six months in SURPLUS spending. Not even counting just the regular spending. The Federal government takes in about four trillion a year. That is unprecedented spending.

But hey, you have Democrat propaganda to keep spreading, sorry for getting in the way

thinking there is a difference in spending behavior by the two criminal gangs, is an example of propaganda working.

You live in a post math world, huh? Trump spent 2 trillion on Covid in 2020. That's a lot. But it's less than 6 trillion in half of 2021 Biden is spending. By a fair bit.

Gipper: I look like the Democrats? Huh, I don't see it ...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's all from the same place. Thin air.

Money from the US Treasury is raised by selling Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes.
Not thin air.

All those things have to be paid back, with interest, so are not sources of income.

All those things have to be paid back, with interest,

Yes. So fucking what?

so are not sources of income.

And?

 

[Rigby5]

Hitler was a socialist...he formed his own socialist party, the National Socialist, and killed any threat to his power. He then took control over all private industry, and allowed some to remain, so long as they only worked for the good of the state. That's what Facsism is all about.

Hitler and socialism. The connection is as big and wide as the Pacific ocean. Yet leftists pretend
it doesn't exist.

You have to be a dumb oblivious liar to defend what the Left does.

Sure there is a connection.
The wealthy elite in German picked Hitler to murder all the socialists, because he was to anti-socialist.
Hitler was not elected chancellor, but appointed by Hindenburg, and since Hindenburg represented the wealthy elite, why would he have appointed a socialist, and they why would Hitler have killed all his fellow socialists, if he were a socialist?
Name a single company other that Junkers, that was controlled by the German government under Hitler?

 

[Correll]

People suffered for 60 years but you felt good.

I don't feel good that the Cuban people have suffered under Communism for 60 years.

But you are fine with our sanctions that contributed to their suffering and accomplished nothing.

What diplomatic efforts has Cuba made to improve relations since the whole, being our enemy thing?