ISIS Beheads Another Brit

[frigidweirdo]

Sure, it was definitely partly due to the oil. It is imperative that it is secured for the good of the entire world. Do you not understand that?

The US being the entire world?

The US uses more than China, Japan and India put together, that's a population of 2.4 billion people or so. That's like 1/3 of the world.

Good of the entire world my ass.

We ALL use oil. Yes, without oil, the world and the economy would collapse, genius. Good grief!!! You can't be so dense as to think that the United States is the ONLY country to which oil is important!!!

But somehow the US seems to use more.

Germany uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
France uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
South Africa uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
the Ivory Coast uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.

Get the picture?

 

[ChrisL]

That's why I've suggested that we go in and take over the countries with the oil. They are TOO unstable and retarded to run a country and they use the oil as a weapon. They are like spoiled children, and the good of the rest of the world SHOULD take precedence over those savages.

Oh, and the US is the country that can run things well huh?

Hurricane Katrina.
The post war period in Iraq
Afghanistan in general.

Hell, the US can't even run itself let alone another country. Two parties who bicker more than they actually do anything, an education system the envy of anyone who absolutely no money, universities away from the govt actually have some prestige. Also a lot of people in the country don't trust the govt to run their own country.

I'd rather NORWAY run these countries, and the US, they'd do a much better job.

Well, Norway is TINY. Lol! Yes, I think the United States and pretty much ANY country that is not a part of the Middle East could do a MUCH better job at managing the oil and everything else! Really, the people in the middle east are so caught up in their centuries old "battles" and their religious preoccupations and hating on everyone and blaming everyone, that they cannot function. THAT much is obvious. Something's got to give.

 

[irosie91]

Sure, it was definitely partly due to the oil. It is imperative that it is secured for the good of the entire world. Do you not understand that?

The US being the entire world?

The US uses more than China, Japan and India put together, that's a population of 2.4 billion people or so. That's like 1/3 of the world.

Good of the entire world my ass.

We ALL use oil. Yes, without oil, the world and the economy would collapse, genius. Good grief!!! You can't be so dense as to think that the United States is the ONLY country to which oil is important!!!

But somehow the US seems to use more.

Germany uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
France uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
South Africa uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
the Ivory Coast uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.

Get the picture?

yes----you have made it clear that the USA did not enter either Afghanistan or Iraq for the sake of OIL

 

[ChrisL]

That's why I've suggested that we go in and take over the countries with the oil. They are TOO unstable and retarded to run a country and they use the oil as a weapon. They are like spoiled children, and the good of the rest of the world SHOULD take precedence over those savages.

chris------not a bad idea-------the good news is that the countries that seem to have lots-------are kinda hostile to
lots of people----------ISIS/IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA------the them thar EMIRATES ---------the Saudis and the emirates make slaves out of HINDUS-------a nice potential FIFTH COLUMN

It would be a HUGE headache for any country that decided to action against the savages. A HUGE splitting headache. Lol! I imagine that the terror attacks would increase ten-fold because the savages would be SO angry.

 

[ChrisL]

Sure, it was definitely partly due to the oil. It is imperative that it is secured for the good of the entire world. Do you not understand that?

The US being the entire world?

The US uses more than China, Japan and India put together, that's a population of 2.4 billion people or so. That's like 1/3 of the world.

Good of the entire world my ass.

We ALL use oil. Yes, without oil, the world and the economy would collapse, genius. Good grief!!! You can't be so dense as to think that the United States is the ONLY country to which oil is important!!!

But somehow the US seems to use more.

Germany uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
France uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
South Africa uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.
the Ivory Coast uses oil. It didn't invade Iraq.

Get the picture?

That is because, unfortunately, we are the "sugar daddy" of the world. They rely on the United States to make ALL the bold moves. Also, we have the MOST powerful military might on EARTH. That means a LOT.

 

[irosie91]

That's why I've suggested that we go in and take over the countries with the oil. They are TOO unstable and retarded to run a country and they use the oil as a weapon. They are like spoiled children, and the good of the rest of the world SHOULD take precedence over those savages.

chris------not a bad idea-------the good news is that the countries that seem to have lots-------are kinda hostile to
lots of people----------ISIS/IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA------the them thar EMIRATES ---------the Saudis and the emirates make slaves out of HINDUS-------a nice potential FIFTH COLUMN

It would be a HUGE headache for any country that decided to action against the savages. A HUGE splitting headache. Lol! I imagine that the terror attacks would increase ten-fold because the savages would be SO angry.

not really. People is people----most want what is BEST FOR THEM-----ie ---if they see an advantage to themselves. Only a few break into the terrorist mode under ANY circumstances-------that is why MOST muslims in the USA-----are simple doing their work and buying their groceries and doing the laundry-----even if they BELIEVE in the GLORIOUS GOLDEN CALIPHATE

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, Norway is TINY. Lol! Yes, I think the United States and pretty much ANY country that is not a part of the Middle East could do a MUCH better job at managing the oil and everything else! Really, the people in the middle east are so caught up in their centuries old "battles" and their religious preoccupations and hating on everyone and blaming everyone, that they cannot function. THAT much is obvious. Something's got to give.

Yeah, tiny and efing rich.

U.S. National Debt Clock Real Time

$17,000,000,000,000 in debt.

US Debt Clock National Debt of United States

Citizen's share $56,197

Norway Debt Clock National Debt of Norway

$114,000,000,000

"Comment: NOTE The Norwegian central government is in a net asset position, i.e. the government’s total financial assets exceed the total deb"

The people in the middle are caught up in their age old battles, mainly because the west goes in every so often and messes things up, preventing stability and preventing any good from happening. Oh, we ignored that, didn't we?

 

[frigidweirdo]

That is because, unfortunately, we are the "sugar daddy" of the world. They rely on the United States to make ALL the bold moves. Also, we have the MOST powerful military might on EARTH. That means a LOT.

Yeah, they rely on the US to INVADE them.

Yes, having the most powerful military in the world certainly does help when you want to take over anyone who doesn't agree with you and has oil.

Though it didn't help in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan. Most military might doesn't mean the US can actually sort anything out.

 

[frigidweirdo]

not really. People is people----most want what is BEST FOR THEM-----ie ---if they see an advantage to themselves. Only a few break into the terrorist mode under ANY circumstances-------that is why MOST muslims in the USA-----are simple doing their work and buying their groceries and doing the laundry-----even if they BELIEVE in the GLORIOUS GOLDEN CALIPHATE

As opposed to most Muslims in any other country who are....... getting on with their lives and doing their laundry.

Oh, wait, isn't that the crap you're told by the US govt? No, they tell you all 1 billion Muslims are terrorists and figure that as they didn't bother teaching you math properly (money had to go finance some war, depending on how old you are) so that you won't figure out that it makes no sense.

 

[frigidweirdo]

yes----you have made it clear that the USA did not enter either Afghanistan or Iraq for the sake of OIL

Oh really. Then why did the US put so many lives on the line then? Because the US is so cuddly and cute? Always does the nice thing?

What is this, retard 101? "No, it's not for oil, it's for the teddy bears".

 

[irosie91]

not really. People is people----most want what is BEST FOR THEM-----ie ---if they see an advantage to themselves. Only a few break into the terrorist mode under ANY circumstances-------that is why MOST muslims in the USA-----are simple doing their work and buying their groceries and doing the laundry-----even if they BELIEVE in the GLORIOUS GOLDEN CALIPHATE

As opposed to most Muslims in any other country who are....... getting on with their lives and doing their laundry.

Oh, wait, isn't that the crap you're told by the US govt? No, they tell you all 1 billion Muslims are terrorists and figure that as they didn't bother teaching you math properly (money had to go finance some war, depending on how old you are) so that you won't figure out that it makes no sense.

I learned math very well-------broke 700 on the SAT ----and aced calculus in college. Did you pass high school geometry? Someone told me that a billion muslims are terrorists? who told me that? I know lots of muslims who are not terrorists -------but I have been in mosques where I was told that
CHRISTIANS ARE THE ENEMEEEEEEES OF ISLAAAM------which---I guess---makes Christians the
terrorists

 

[TooTall]

Afghanistan was invaded to stop bin Laden from mounting another attack on the US. In order to do that, the Taliban that was protecting him had to be taken out of power. Does 911 ring a bell?

This is so simple, and doesn't take into account the many different areas of interest that the US has. Part of the reason, and a small part, was bin Laden.

HOWEVER, if you read that report I presented, or anything else, you'll see that the US govt asked the Afghan regime to hand over bin Laden and they said "okay, if you provide the evidence that he was responsible for 9/11".

Bush couldn't do that. Who extradites anyone without any proof? (The UK maybe, that's about it).

So if the US could have got bin Laden without a war, why wouldn't they have pushed and pushed and pushed to get this? They hardly even tried. They wanted the war. Why? It wasn't for bin Laden.

Afghanistan was invaded to stop bin Laden from mounting another attack on the US. In order to do that, the Taliban that was protecting him had to be taken out of power. Does 911 ring a bell?

This is so simple, and doesn't take into account the many different areas of interest that the US has. Part of the reason, and a small part, was bin Laden.

HOWEVER, if you read that report I presented, or anything else, you'll see that the US govt asked the Afghan regime to hand over bin Laden and they said "okay, if you provide the evidence that he was responsible for 9/11".

Bush couldn't do that. Who extradites anyone without any proof? (The UK maybe, that's about it).

So if the US could have got bin Laden without a war, why wouldn't they have pushed and pushed and pushed to get this? They hardly even tried. They wanted the war. Why? It wasn't for bin Laden.

If I wanted to read any more of your BS I would merely go to the World Socialist site. If you are suggesting that bin laden did not plan and execute the attack on 911, just say so. Then you can start a movement to have Obama tried at the Hague for killing an innocent man.

 

[Vigilante]

Perhaps Liberals need THIS to be a video!

 

[ChrisL]

That's why I've suggested that we go in and take over the countries with the oil. They are TOO unstable and retarded to run a country and they use the oil as a weapon. They are like spoiled children, and the good of the rest of the world SHOULD take precedence over those savages.

chris------not a bad idea-------the good news is that the countries that seem to have lots-------are kinda hostile to
lots of people----------ISIS/IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA------the them thar EMIRATES ---------the Saudis and the emirates make slaves out of HINDUS-------a nice potential FIFTH COLUMN

It would be a HUGE headache for any country that decided to action against the savages. A HUGE splitting headache. Lol! I imagine that the terror attacks would increase ten-fold because the savages would be SO angry.

not really. People is people----most want what is BEST FOR THEM-----ie ---if they see an advantage to themselves. Only a few break into the terrorist mode under ANY circumstances-------that is why MOST muslims in the USA-----are simple doing their work and buying their groceries and doing the laundry-----even if they BELIEVE in the GLORIOUS GOLDEN CALIPHATE

I agree with the gist of your post, but I still think there would be MUCH anger in the ME and lots of attacks because of it. Why people would WANT to continue to live the way those people live is beyond what I can fathom. Maybe because all I've ever known is life in the United States? I don't know, but I cannot relate to those people and their thought processes at all. I'm thinking that if I lived there, I would WELCOME the United States because I would then have more freedom (especially as a woman), running water, electricity, jobs . . .

 

[ChrisL]

That is because, unfortunately, we are the "sugar daddy" of the world. They rely on the United States to make ALL the bold moves. Also, we have the MOST powerful military might on EARTH. That means a LOT.

Yeah, they rely on the US to INVADE them.

Yes, having the most powerful military in the world certainly does help when you want to take over anyone who doesn't agree with you and has oil.

Though it didn't help in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan. Most military might doesn't mean the US can actually sort anything out.

Do you realize how people in Afghanistan and a lot of other ME countries live? They don't really have it good. Lol! MOST of them would probably do MUCH better if the United States was to take over their countries.

Anyway, that will NEVER happen because of many different reasons, only one being the wimps in our own country.

 

[ChrisL]

Well, Norway is TINY. Lol! Yes, I think the United States and pretty much ANY country that is not a part of the Middle East could do a MUCH better job at managing the oil and everything else! Really, the people in the middle east are so caught up in their centuries old "battles" and their religious preoccupations and hating on everyone and blaming everyone, that they cannot function. THAT much is obvious. Something's got to give.

Yeah, tiny and efing rich.

U.S. National Debt Clock Real Time

$17,000,000,000,000 in debt.

US Debt Clock National Debt of United States

Citizen's share $56,197

Norway Debt Clock National Debt of Norway

$114,000,000,000

"Comment: NOTE The Norwegian central government is in a net asset position, i.e. the government’s total financial assets exceed the total deb"

The people in the middle are caught up in their age old battles, mainly because the west goes in every so often and messes things up, preventing stability and preventing any good from happening. Oh, we ignored that, didn't we?

You cannot compare our country with their country. It's not reasonable.

 

[ChrisL]

yes----you have made it clear that the USA did not enter either Afghanistan or Iraq for the sake of OIL

Oh really. Then why did the US put so many lives on the line then? Because the US is so cuddly and cute? Always does the nice thing?

What is this, retard 101? "No, it's not for oil, it's for the teddy bears".

It was for a VARIETY of reasons. Why is it that you think there is only ONE reason why we went over there?

 

[irosie91]

yes----you have made it clear that the USA did not enter either Afghanistan or Iraq for the sake of OIL

Oh really. Then why did the US put so many lives on the line then? Because the US is so cuddly and cute? Always does the nice thing?

What is this, retard 101? "No, it's not for oil, it's for the teddy bears".

It was for a VARIETY of reasons. Why is it that you think there is only ONE reason why we went over there?

I don't think it was only ONE reason. We certainly do not
continue a war in Afghanistan ONLY BECAUSE OF BIN LADEN

 

[Roudy]

ISIS Claims To Have Killed British Hostage Alan Henning
ISIS Claims To Have Killed British Hostage Alan Henning

From HuffPost:
A video released by the Islamic State group on Friday appears to show the beheading of British aid worker Alan Henning, the Associated Press reports. In the clip, the militants threaten to kill another hostage they identify as American Peter Kassig.

Alan Henning, a 47-year-old taxi driver from Eccles, was kidnapped in December after crossing into Syria with an aid convoy. Henning's wife, Barbara, had pleaded with the militants not to kill her husband. "He went to Syria to help his Muslim friends deliver much needed aid," she said in a statement released on Sept. 23.

Catrin Nye, a BBC reporter who had filmed with Henning, described the Brit as "kind and funny."

Obama's bombing really scared ISIS, huh!

So you think he should start air strikes on civilian areas where ISIS has disseminated? Don't dodge the question. Answer it.

No he should send in some special forces that he so stupidly removed entirely, which created the rise of ISIS.

 

[Vigilante]